TPMDC

CBO Score Of Senate Health Care Bill May Be Delayed As Questions Remain

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Fmr. CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Senate Democrats are worried they may be delayed debating the merged health care bill Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sent to the Congressional Budget Office Monday while they wait for the CBO to score the measure.

Roll Call is reporting (sub. req.) that senators are concerned the score may not be available for another week and a half, which would postpone the debate beginning late next week.

As Brian detailed yesterday, there are plenty of unanswered questions about the bill.

TPMDC interviewed former CBO chief Doug Holtz-Eakin, who served as an economic adviser to the McCain campaign last year.

"It's so unclear to me what actually is being proposed," he told us, adding he was surprised any senators have been able to take sides since the details are scarce. "There are a million questions."

Here's his checklist focused on the public option opt-out:

Do states have to pass a law or does the governor make the decision? When do they need to decide whether they are opting out? Can they opt back in if they change their mind? What if an election or term expiring or change in political landscape occur? Does the state get a second chance? Is it subject to state taxes? What if someone lives in a public option state and then moves to a state which has opted out?

Holtz-Eakin said the lack of detail isn't unprecedented since CBO has yet to score the bill. Senators can't retail the particulars of the measure in the press until they have that information, he said.

Democratic members of the Senate have been answering citizen health care questions via video this week, but none seem to address the public option structure yet.

Join the Conversation!

11 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

October 28, 2009 4:18 PM   

And Holtz-Eakin has nothing to gain by poo-pooing this?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 4:44 PM   

"he was surprised any senators have been able to take sides since the details are scarce."

And this guy worked in Washington?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 4:50 PM   

Not cool, Zeus, not cool.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 4:53 PM   

I think is just another example of the WH being disengaged. Seems like the President could pick of the phone and tell CBO this is a big priority and to get it done. The longer this drags out, the more industry gets and less the people get.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 5:07 PM    in reply to xargaw

Does everything have to do with the WH? This is more likely than not about CBO having 535 backseat drivers (read senators and congressmen) who ask thousands and thousands of questions daily. Blaming the WH is just petty.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 5:13 PM    in reply to xargaw

The WH has appeared too disengaged but, considering CBO director Doug Elmendorff used to work with Larry Summers and Robert Rubin (advocating free trade and small deficits, interestingly enough), he's certainly not far separated from the WH financial think tank ethos, Right?

I'm guessing that, unless Elmendorff has been living under a rock, he's probably heard about this HCR stuff and how everybody's all a-flap over it. Of course, being a free trader/small deficiter I'm sure he wants to claw all over that thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 5:31 PM    in reply to xargaw

What are you talking about? It is the Senates job to get the details to the cbo. The president shouldn't be pushing the cbo to rush anything. How shady does that look?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 5:07 PM   

I agree the WH needs to really try hammering this one through instead of constantly compromising and letting it drag on and on. The public is behind it, they need to get a surge in support off that and just push it through.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 5:43 PM   

The CBO score will be EXTREMELY important for this bill to go forward. If the CBO score has the bill around $900 billion, brings the deficit down the first decade and then even more the 2nd decade, then this bill will GO ALONG WAY for centrists to come onboard.

A good CBO score will go REALLY help in twisting people's arms more than even if Obama was begging.

Orszag was involved in shaping the bill combo and he used to be head of the CBO and he knows how this works. I am sure that the White House is expecting a good score.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 28, 2009 9:39 PM   

"It's so unclear to me what actually is being proposed," he told us, adding he was surprised any senators have been able to take sides since the details are scarce. "There are a million questions." ... Do states have to pass a law or does the governor make the decision? When do they need to decide whether they are opting out? Can they opt back in if they change their mind? What if an election or term expiring or change in political landscape occur? Does the state get a second chance? Is it subject to state taxes? What if someone lives in a public option state and then moves to a state which has opted out?

blah blah blah

none of those details are likely to determine anyone's position on whether or not they support public option with opt-out.

is he honestly (ha!) suggesting that those kinds of details are make or break for even a single senator???

not that those details aren't important, but they certainly are not determinative.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 29, 2009 9:56 AM   

"It's so unclear to me what actually is being proposed," he told us, adding he was surprised any senators have been able to take sides since the details are scarce. "There are a million questions."

then he goes to say

Holtz-Eakin said the lack of detail isn't unprecedented since CBO has yet to score the bill. Senators can't retail the particulars of the measure in the press until they have that information, he said.

So in his mind, he says no one should be supportive of it because details that dont affect the CBO's ability to score it arent known to the public, and shouldnt be until the CBO scores it.

So which is it boss, the chicken or the egg?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on