TPMDC

Gavin Newsom Drops Out Of California Gubernatorial Race

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

San Fransisco Mayor Gavin Newsom (D)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has dropped out of the California gubernatorial race, citing unspecified family obligations.

"With a young family and responsibilities at City Hall, I have found it impossible to commit the time required to complete this effort the way it needs to - and should be - done," Newsom said in a statement.

Newsom had trailed the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, state Attorney General and former Governor Jerry Brown, in both poll numbers, organizational support and fundraising. With Newsom now out of the race, Brown's road to the Democratic nomination -- and perhaps even to to the governor's mansion after a 28-year absence -- is now that much clearer.

Late Update: The Los Angeles Times seems to put this development down to a lack of support for Newsom's candidacy:

Although Newsom had been effectively running for more than a year, his campaign never gained much traction. Even in his hometown, which Newsom touted as a model of cutting-edge policies, his candidacy was widely derided among civic insiders.

Perhaps most telling was the absence of support from the major San Francisco donors who helped underwrite Newsom's successful campaigns in the city. He also drew relatively few endorsements from the ranks of his fellow elected officials.

Join the Conversation!

30 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

October 30, 2009 6:25 PM   

Too bad. I like the Mayor. I also liked Jerry Brown, 30 years ago.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 6:45 PM   

HE can run when Brown is finished with his term.

Brown is an almost certain LOCK for California governor. I applaud this development.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 7:03 PM   

saw that one coming. not sure why anyone ever thought he had a shot at it. he's done politically from what I can tell. his careers starts and ends in SF. he was paid for with Getty money, appointed by Willie Brown to board of supes, built his campaign for mayor on the backs of the cities homeless, and then barely won his first election in SF over green candidate Gonzales, who only jumped in the frey a few months before that race. sorry, charlie

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 7:04 PM   

He's a lightweight compared to Brown. We need a guy with Brown's knowledge of how things work and don't work in Sacramento to dig us out of the hole the Republicans have dug for us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 7:16 PM   

Newsom committed the unpardonable. He violated the Guy Code and slept with his good friend's wife. That shows amorality lack of principle on a very deep level.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 7:23 PM    in reply to skitzo

Bingo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 8:42 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

Funny all this interest in his affair and man-code. I've heard at least two local reporters at different times and locations insinuate that he's really gay and uses women as props for his political career.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 10:21 PM    in reply to skitzo

Absolutely agree. Blamed it on alcohol. So glad he's out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 7:25 PM   

Damn. Newsom had "risky" and even perhaps "lightweight" written all over him, and his character issues are legitimately troubling.

But he also showed glimpses of potentially having the initiative and vision to make a head-on attack on the fundamental structural horror that is current the California governmental system. (Briefly, e.g., the 2/3 requirement for approving budgets and taxes, primarily, but other items as well.)

As for the candidacy of Jerry Brown: I remember Governor Jerry Brown, I voted for him and watched him govern and also campaign in other contexts for progressive and sensible policies through the 90s. Friends, this new candidate is no Jerry Brown.

He's made a pledge not to raise taxes ! Have you seen California's budget lately???? He is not talking any sort of game about changing the game of how California works. I've always liked Brown a lot, he's quite terrific and refreshing in many ways. But this latest incarnation seems like a victory lap; his talk is that of working around the edges, of fixing a thing or two, along the lines of the usual "cutting waste" crap that politicians mouth. The old Jerry Brown wouldn't talk this way, But This Jerry Brown IS Talking This Way.

Progressives, even moderate progressives, hell All Californians, need a challenger to arise to Brown post-haste.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 11:48 AM    in reply to Samsinister

Your points are very well taken; I'm concerned as well about Brown's "pragmatic" rhetoric. He was never very easy to categorize because he could take strong stances in some areas and then shift with the political winds in others (e.g., implementation of Prop. 13).

That said, I don't know if a strong challenger to Brown is the best strategy. Brown isn't stupid. He knows how hard it will be to make meaningful structural changes. His assessment may be that, as bad as things are right now, the system isn't ready for a frontal assault -- at least by a candidate for governor.

Remember that this is the guy who once called for a constitutional convention. Brown is one of the most out-of-the-box politicians of our time. Is it possible that once elected -- and pushed by well-organized progressives -- that he will provide political muscle when needed?

That's a question, not a veiled comment. I do think, however, that FDR was right: You've got to FORCE political leadership to make difficult policy choices rather than expecting them to walk the plank all by themselves. Where is the political groundswell for structural change colored by progressive -- rather than teabagger -- values?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 3:58 PM    in reply to Dr Lemming

Excellent analysis Dr Lemming. I was hoping myself that the Democratic Primary here was going to be a Progressive fistfight that revved up the troops to take California in a quick left turn. Brown is a tough one to know and Newsome would have pushed him to stand harder left on most of the things dragging the state down right now. I was hoping for a commitment to a state wide single payer healthcare program for one ...... who knows now.....

Jerry Brown will make an great Governor anyway with a solid Democratic legislature we can get some things done out here at last.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 5:27 PM    in reply to hollywood

You praise Dr Lemming's analysis, hollywood, but the points you make actually support Samsinister's claim that we need a Dem challenger to Brown. Dr Lemming recognizes that it is a legitimate question whether Brown when elected will provide muscle for progressive causes. It is surely prudent to try to get some sense of the answer to that question before we elect Brown. The only way to do that is to have a challenger force him to answer it affirmatively, just as (as you point out) Newsom would have done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 7:33 PM   

And all I got out of the deal was this green garbage pail for required composting beginning 11/24

When I embarked on this campaign in April, my goal was to engage thousands and thousands of Californians dedicated to reforming our broken system and bringing change to Sacramento.

I would like to thank those supporters, volunteers, and donors who have worked so hard on my behalf. I have been humbled by their support and am indebted to their efforts. They represent the spirit of change and determination essential to putting California back on the right track.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

TJ1

user-pic

October 30, 2009 7:40 PM   

“The door’s wide open now ... it’s going to happen ... whether you like it or not.”

Looks like the door just got slammed shut.

He was one politician not ready for prime time, and looking at him perform, one wonders whether he would ever be.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 8:21 PM   

He is a grandstanding lightweight. So he built a successful business bankrolled with Getty money. BFD.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 12:24 PM    in reply to skitzo

Getty money helped, but so did his appointment to the SF Board of Supes by then-Mayor Willie Brown. Had Gavin actually run for the office, folks would've learned from the start how shallow he is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 8:37 PM   

Jerry Brown will have Gubbnah Reaganegger's desk sent to Crawford, Texas where it belongs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 8:41 PM   

I can only hope everything I've read about this 'older' Jerry Brown is wrong or will be wrong. As a State of CA employee (environmental scientist), the impact of this upcoming election on my family will be huge.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 9:21 PM    in reply to Proud of my Bleeding Heart

As citizen of the once-great state of CA, the impact of this upcoming election on my family will be huge. Maybe Brown, like Obama, can make some progress towards cleaning up the mess made by the swaggering but useless republican before them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 11:15 AM    in reply to dustbunny44

I live in Southern California and remember when Jerry Brown was governor before and he was an excellent governor as was his father before him. The worst things that ever happened in this State were all under Republican governors (surprise surprise). Gray Davis was a prize compared to Ahnold.

I hope we can change the way the State does business and for sure, getting rid of the proposition system and the 2/3rds majority it takes to pass anything in this State, thanks to the Republican scum bags who have ruined this state.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 11:17 AM    in reply to Proud of my Bleeding Heart

I don't know what you read about him but I can tell you from my perspective he was a great governor. Of course, as usual, the republicans tried to demonize him about everything. Sound familiar??

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 9:38 PM   

I think Jerry Brown will make an excellent Governor. I liked him very much last time he held that office. Meg Whitman, now that is scary. I wish she was the one dropping out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 9:59 PM   

I no longer live in CA, but think Brown would be excellent. He certainly understands the full scale of the job and how the legislature works. CA needs this kind of seasoned professional. They have never been in this much trouble, ever! Brown has never been one to shy away from telling the truth, no matter how unpleasant or politically incorrect. CA needs that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 30, 2009 10:36 PM   

The way to run for governor in this state is via recall. It costs upwards of 40 million to run in an election, but only 4 million to mount a recall. The sitting governor cannot be on the ballot, and must get 50 percent plus one of the vote, while the challenger need only muster a plurality. We could have had 10 recalls for the money we blew on Angelides. Sooner or later one of them would have ousted Schwarzenegger since he is so clearly in over his head.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 3:44 AM    in reply to runfastandwin

haha great point, never thought about it that way but it's true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 12:26 AM   

Sooooo disappointed. I don't think I have been as supportive of a politician since Hillary and then Obama. We need a governor in CA, not Conan pillaging everything we have.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 1:45 AM   

Some shoe is about to drop, don't care though, time for Jerry Brown to be Governor again!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 2:24 AM   

My wife made the best Newsom reference earlier tonight; American Psycho.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 31, 2009 3:43 AM   

I was never too sure about how good of a Governor he would make. Also with the way CA is doing I don't blame him for stepping out gracefully.

CA needs someone who will really change things and get the state back on the rails. The proposition system and tax issues are two huge subjects that need to be put in check instead of continuing to damage the state while endless bickering and grandstanding goes on over them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on