NRCC communications director Ken Spain released this statement on the House Democrats' unveiling of their health care bill, making it clear that the GOP will try to keep on using this issue as a cudgel against Democrats in swing districts:
"The lasting image coming out of today's press conference is one of dozens of House Democrats standing proudly behind an incredibly unpopular Nancy Pelosi as she prepares to lead them off a political cliff. Not only will the Democrats' government takeover of healthcare lead to increased costs, higher taxes, and cuts to Medicare, it also feeds into the emerging narrative that Nancy Pelosi and her puppets are more interested in creating government even if it comes at the expense of creating jobs."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

johnmccsf
October 29, 2009 11:33 AM
R they terrified that HCR will pass after all these many decades and leave them holding their teabags or what?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 29, 2009 11:35 AM
Good God. If Nancy Pelosi is incredibly unpopular, what does he say about Republicans?
Denial.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fsudirectory
October 29, 2009 11:44 AM in reply to CT Voter
Yeah -- If her rating is considered that bad, I dont know how they can come out and say theirs, which is worse, makes them better than her.... fairly odd logic.
I guess it works with those who dont actually look at the polls and are just told to not like her
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mostman
October 29, 2009 11:47 AM in reply to CT Voter
Denial is exactly the word. When these folks come out and say "unpopular government takeover of the health care system" - I often wonder if they believe it. Have they said it so much, that its become truth to them. Take a look at kos' writeup yesterday on Republican party approval broken down by region. If I was the minority right now, I would be spending more time trying to convince people why they should follow me and less time burying my head in the sand saying "No worries! Everyone is following me!" We witnessed this same kind of behavior in the runup to the election last year. Look how that worked out for them. The silent majority fallacy lives on.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
October 29, 2009 2:49 PM in reply to mostman
What I find interesting is that so many of the R's actually believe that the reason they are so low in the polls is that they aren't conservative enough.
Ah, the blindness of the committed ideologue. Facts that defy the ideology should be ignored, and the R's are good at that ignoring.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Champlain
October 29, 2009 2:10 PM in reply to CT Voter
Does anyone remember, during the first term of the Clinton Administration, when Newt Gingich would appear on TV at the drop of a hat and go, "Bill Clinton, this terribly unpopular President (etc.)"?
He worked that phrase in, as part of Clinton's name, every single time he opened his mouth to talk about Clinton.
Based on what we now know about the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, it's hardly 2+2 to figure out that Frank Luntz probably handed Newt this move, as sort of a "Subliminal Man" tactic: convince the Unwashed that "Clinton" is synonomous with and inextricable from "terribly unpopular", and... well Jesus, who wants to support a guy who's unpopular? I mean, c'mon, this is America, where we all want to be rich, beautiful and popular!
The good news: Bill Clinton was re-elected, anyway. Left office after a sex scandal with super-high popularity ratings.
... but that is what the Pelosi modifier was all about, just so you know what you're looking at, here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 29, 2009 3:05 PM in reply to Barry Champlain
That's an interesting observation. I'll have to pay attention to how many times "incredibly unpopular" is attached to Nancy Pelosi. If it's a concerted effort, I still think it's lame. Nancy Pelosi isn't a household name, even if Republicans think they should be. Bill Clinton? Different story. Republican takes to the airwaves to criticize a Democratic president? Incredible attention (still). Republicans take to the airwaves to criticize a Democratic Speaker of the House? Yawn. What's a Speaker of the House, anyway?
I'm joking, mostly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 29, 2009 11:41 AM
GOP and the Insurance co's are working together with the plan of the Insurance racket jacking up premiums to which the GOP will frame it as "Dem reform make this happen, vote us in and we'll fix it". 2010 is going to be a blood bath because most reforms will not be paying off yet and the premium hike will have everybody angry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pete Bilderback
October 29, 2009 11:56 AM
Nancy Pelosi is wildly, massively popular compared to House Republican leadership. Compared to John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi is the Beatles circa 1964, Elvis cira 1955, and Michael Jackson circa 1983 all rolled into one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wickning1
October 29, 2009 12:46 PM
I don't get it, what's the motivation for "creating government at the expense of creating jobs"? Conservatives always seem to imply that liberals have some nefarious purpose of creating more government programs for no reason other than to grow the government.
It's easy to understand why right wing capitalists want less government, it's easier to exploit people and make billions that way. What's the scary backstory behind the liberals and their pro-fixing-things agenda? Conservatives seem to think liberals truly, honestly WANT to abort more babies, turn their kids gay, crash the economy, and throw people into gulags. Huh?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve LaBonne
October 29, 2009 12:51 PM in reply to wickning1
Conservativz is stoopid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Redshift
October 29, 2009 2:27 PM in reply to wickning1
Many of the bizarre conservative caricatures of liberals derive from the belief that if something is a driving issue for conservatives and liberals don't agree, then the exact opposite must be a driving issue for liberals.
For example, conservatives believe in cutting taxes as an end in itself, liberals don't, therefore liberals must believe in raising taxes as an end in itself.
Conservatives claim to believe that shrinking government is always good (though they rarely actually do it), therefore liberals must believe in growing government.
It's a reflection of a black-and-white worldview and seeing everything in relation to themselves. The fact that liberals have other goals entirely and raising taxes when necessary or establishing new government programs are just the means to those goals is too complex to put in a sound bite to try to demonize us.
The sad thing is there was a time not so long ago that there were actual conservative intellectuals who also had more complex goals, and could articulate reasons why they thought things like cutting taxes and limiting government were good. I disagreed with them, but it was possible to have a debate. Now we've had thirty years of corrupt "taxes iz evil" conservatives who use tax cuts as giveaways when they're in power and as a club against Democrats trying to clean up their mess after they leave power.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
October 29, 2009 2:34 PM in reply to Redshift
Very insightful post. You should expand it into a diary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
October 29, 2009 3:00 PM in reply to Redshift
I agree with Agio. You should make this into a diary.
What has amazed me is that thirty years ago the conservatives were able to use Public Relations techniques to shoehorn a near senile ex-actor into office as President. From that point on, the Public Relations talking points have been dominant over actual policy and solutions to real public problems.
Special interests like Wall Street bankers then took over the crafting of the PR talking points for their own interests.
It all came crashing down in Bush's second term. They had crafted a government that no longer worked and an economy that no longer worked. But when we point this out to them, they respond with more PR talking points and fake issues designed to split the political opposition instead of solutions to real national issues. TV makes this a lot easier.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
October 29, 2009 2:07 PM
God I hate this sort of mealymouthed gobbledygook. I don't think very many real Americans give a shit about "emerging narratives" when they're too busy figuring out how to pay their skyrocketing premiums.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?