On May 8th--long before Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) made his primary challenge to Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) official--I wrote that "as long as Sestak's running, or threatening to run, both men will feel the incentive to move left. That's good news for progressives on its own, and even better if the brinksmanship results in a sort of political positive feedback loop, where each candidate does his best to prove himself more liberal than the other."
Soon after that--in his first weeks as a Democrat after nearly 30 Republican years--Specter began taking baby steps to the left. But as time has gone on, the extent to which the two men have indeed attempted to outdo each other by taking more and more progressive stances has become fairly comical.
In June, Specter began to appease labor leaders, after first vowing to oppose the Employee Free Choice Act. He ultimately helped broker a reported compromise on the bill.
The same month, he came around on the public option, announcing his support for a government insurance plan that would compete with private insurers. And just yesterday, he took it a step further, opining in favor of a "robust public option."
As a reward for this sea change, he's maintained the support of the entire Democratic establishment, including President Obama, and Vice President Biden, both of whom he praises frequently and effusively in public statements and on Twitter.
Without that sort of institutional support, Sestak has settled in to the role of the outsider, who leads the way for party men like Specter to follow. He launched a petition demanding an up-or-down vote on the public option in both chambers of Congress, and has urged the Senate (cough, Specter, cough), limping behind the House, to pass far-reaching climate change legislation. (When I asked Sestak about the public option months ago, he had not yet decided his position on the issue. In August, he announced he'd have a hard time voting for a health care bill without a public option.)
There's no mistaking the pattern here, which hasn't gone unnoticed by grassroots Democrats who see in primary challenges the opportunity to move conservative members of the party closer to the mainstream.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

par4
October 9, 2009 3:45 PM
Hey, Pennsylvania when you think Specter think Lieberman.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
October 9, 2009 3:55 PM
I think Spector has behaved / performed very well since turning blue. No reason to punish a good deed.
The bigger question is which guy can actually beat the GOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BrendanM
October 9, 2009 4:22 PM in reply to AnswerFrog
Practically any Democrat with a pulse should be able to defeat the presumptive Republican candidate, wingnut Pat Toomey.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sharonsj
October 9, 2009 4:15 PM
I'm not sure about either of these guys. In the beginning, with Sestak, I would go to his website for info on his stances--and couldn't find any. Per your article, they both seem to change according to trends, so to me that's politics as usual. Here in PA, the only good news is that they are both leaning left; the question is, will they stay that way?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BrendanM
October 9, 2009 4:23 PM in reply to sharonsj
Sestak has been a fairly consistent supporter of labor, so he's probably a safer bet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
BrewhouseBob
October 9, 2009 4:33 PM
I live in PA. I remember when Specter was chair of the senate judiciary committee. I remember his silence as Bush and Cheney trashed the constitution. I will NEVER vote for Arlen. Never.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
taikan
October 10, 2009 12:24 AM
The problem, as Joe Lieberman has demonstrated many times, is that once Specter gets reelected then he can move back to the right and there is nothing the citizens of Pennsylvania who voted for him can do about it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Coloured European Observer
October 10, 2009 9:12 AM
The problem is indeed who can beat the repub in a election. If that's not a big problem, go with a real Democrat, Sestak. If it IS a problem, check out their programs/platforms.
Specter pulled some pretty bad stuff connected to the Kennedy assassination, he is the author of the Single Bullet Theory. You can say we should let bygones be bygones. You can also say, why reward fickle behaviour? I don't trust a man who could think up gruesome stuff like the Single Bullet Theory.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?