TPMDC

Is Harry Reid Working The Inside Game For A Public Option?

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!


Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid isn't exactly accustomed to kind words from progressives these days. With a health care reform fight that feels endless, and an intractable bloc of conservative Democrats refusing to play nice on the public option, Reid has become a common whipping boy for activists who think he hasn't done enough to strong arm his 60 voting members into giving health care reform an up or down vote.

So it comes as some surprise that two prominent progressive figures, approached by TPMDC, said that much has changed since the summer--and particularly in the last couple weeks--and that Reid is working the inside game for the public option.

"Reid and/or his staff has been in practically hourly conversations with a whole set of progressive players re how best to make sure we position ourselves to get a strong public option coming out of conference committee," said one progressive strategist, who asked not to be named. "He hasn't made any final procedural decisions yet RE how to get that done, but he's having really honest conversations [about] all his major options, pros and cons of each, etc. I'm actually pretty impressed, at least right now."

The source adds, "He and his staff are much more engaged with both pro-public option activists and Senators over the last couple of weeks.... But he does seem to have a new sense of religion [with respect to] figuring out how to maximize our chances for the best possible public option coming out of conference."

Approached by TPMDC, a prominent progressive health care leader echoed this conclusion. "Harry Reid sincerely wants to get a public option and he's doing everything he can to figure out how," the second source added.

An optimistic Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) told TPMDC, "We talk to him, he doesn't have to reach very far. He's listening, clearly Reid's listening on all this on the public option."

Now, that's not to suggest that Reid has won over all progressives regarding his leadership. Far from it. In a way, the comments are more of a reflection of the schism within the progressive community over how best to push Democrats to make good on their campaign promises than it is an indication of a broad change of heart. Reid has recently been involved in a row with some hardline progressive groups over his inability to keep his caucus in check--or at least his inability to prevent conservative Democrats from publicly announcing their willingness to back an expected Republican health care filibuster.

They, and other grassroots figures have been far from shy about their impatience--even disgust--with the embattled Nevada Democrat, who faces a daunting re-election challenge in 2010. Just yesterday, Markos Moulitsas--founder of DailyKos.com--wrote, "I'll take a Chuck Schumer-run Senate with 57 Democrats (bye bye Reid, Lieberman, and Lincoln) than a Harry Reid-run one with 75 Democrats."

Reid's office was not available for comment before press time.

Join the Conversation!

79 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

October 15, 2009 6:25 PM   

It's time to cut the guy a bit of a break...the harvest is plentiful, the laborers few

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:29 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

he can get a break when his actions call for it. Not before.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:34 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

99 Luftballons

Auf ihrem Weg zum Horizont
Hielt man für Ufos aus dem All
Darum schickte ein General
'ne Fliegerstaffel hinterher
Alarm zu geben, wenn es so wär
Dabei war'n da am Horizont
Nur 99 Luftballons

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:37 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

how inappropriate and random of you. Unless somehow saying to judge someone by their actions is tantamount to launching war machines...

but as long as you are amusing yourself, I assume you aren't a danger to your community.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:44 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

Don't you get it?

YOU are amusing me

Get it?
Got it?

Gut!

:=P

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:53 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

Just funnin ya - I think

I never can figure out when I'm not being serious

99 balloons
on their way to the horizon
People think they're UFO's from space
so a general sent up
a fighter squadron after them
Sound the alarm if it's so
but there on the horizon were
only 99 balloons.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:29 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

Are you stoned?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:59 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

No, I think he is saying that Reid is the King of Trial Balloons, or he is making a crack about the Great Balloon Misadventure Story of the day, of he likes Nina.

I can't tell.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:28 PM   

"figuring out how to maximize our chances for the best possible public option coming out of conference."

I guess it depends on what Reid thinks the "best possible public option" is.

Otherwise, wouldn't you simply add the strongest and best public option?

Now, if you are hoping for a more watered down version of a public option, but don't want to come out looking too much like corporate tool, and since the whitehouse is using you for cover, I guess this might be tight. Hmm.

Can't wait to see. Hope I'm wrong.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:37 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

The operative word is POSSIBLE

As in politics is the art of...

99 Jahre Krieg

Ließen keinen Platz für Sieger
Kriegsminister gibt's nicht mehr
Und auch keine Düsenflieger
Heute zieh' ich meine Runden
Seh' die Welt in Trümmern liegen
Hab' 'nen Luftballon gefunden
Denk' an dich und lass' ihn fliegen


http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hcsignon?source=issuespage

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:39 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

post three more times. It is getting funnier. but maybe not as you intended.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:31 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

The he can go to the Jack in the Box drive-thru and order 30 tacos.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

rwc

user-pic

October 15, 2009 6:40 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

I really hope I've been wrong on this as well. But you know, I've never blamed Reid as much as I have the White House. They keep on singing the praises of Snowe and have manuevered to have her on that panel with Baucus, Reid and Dodd (according to NPR and Obermann last night, but I still haven't seen any other media report this). If Obama was clearly twisting arms for a strong PO I'd have a lot more confidence, but I've seen no evidence of this. My guess is we'll get a weak trigger option that almost nobody will be eligible for and which will probably never get triggered.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:41 PM    in reply to rwc

the trigger, as Snowe presents it, isn't even national.

I'm with you, though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:16 PM    in reply to rwc

If you've seen no evidence of it, that just tells you he's running a tight ship, which was pretty effective for his predecessor. But it doesn't tell you whether he twisting arms for the Public Option or working against it. We can't know. Secrecy is sometimes the easiest way to get things done. You can hear yourself think and you can horse trade and do all the stuff you're not supposed to know a President does.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:16 AM    in reply to rwc

I've been trying to figure out what the basics of Reid's game are.

He is majority leader of the Senate. He has no influence on the public. He is elected by 31 or more of the 100 Senators, and the Senators are as close to independent Barons as America produces. Reid starts off with only a minority of the Senators supporting the powers of his office. No one else starts off with much more power than Reid has, but what he has isn't a lot more than any individual Senator has.

Except within a few cliques, there is no hierarchy of power in the Senate. This is something that very few Americans understand. We are all raised with the culture of the factory or the military run by a hierarchy. That exists because the guys in the hierarchy have power over everyone else. No one in the Senate has any real power over any other Senator. Influence is entirely given for personal reasons. Because of the authoritarian nature of the Republican Party base nationally, the Republicans have a little more discipline over Senators than the Democrats do.

The rules of operation in the Senate are - to say the least - traditional, arcane and designed to empower a minority of Senators to stop anything. Anyone who tries to strong-arm a given Senator will find the entire Senate landing on him because the individual Senators defend their individual prerogatives. I think this fact has become more extreme since LBJ was Senate leader, probably because the Parties mattered more then. Today it is just TV and the media.

In short, the Senate is a very strange culture. It's a place understood only by someone who has been a Senator for a while and who has guessed he or she ain't in Kansas any more.

If this is true (and it's only my guess), then for a Senate Majority Leader to get anything done with a minority party that has 40 Senators and a majority party that is made up of independent Senators looking to whoever keeps them in office, there is no value to playing to the camera if he wants to get anything done. Senators play to the camera to get reelected or to run for President, not to get legislation through the Senate.

As dense as the media reporters are, anything this complex is going to be beyond their ken. Besides, who'd read it if they wrote it? No market for that stuff.

Assuming my speculation has any connection to the reality of the Senate, then we have no clue what Harry Reid wants or what he has to do to get it. We are trying to see the light from a black hole. (hint to the physics impaired - light does not escape from a black hole.) We'd never have a clue regarding his strategy for getting health care through that strange body. For us to find out what his strategy was would be to give his opponents a strong tool to defeat it.

I think this is true. It doesn't mean we don't pound on Reid to get what we want. That's something he can use as a tool inside the Senate. It just means that we have to take his good intentions and those of the clique of Democrats who elected him Majority Leader on faith. We'll only know after the game is over what he really intended and what he was capable of delivering. Predictions are useless.

As I say, I am only speculating. I'm not going to waste my time second-guessing Reid, Obama or Pelosi however, and I'll definitely not get angry at anyone on the Democratic side.

Dealing with that crap is one thing we all lost when Kennedy died.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:29 AM    in reply to Richardxx

Oh, and johnmccsf is playing the ambiguity game. He is throwing hints out that only mean anything if you understand the context he is hinting in. Most of the meaning is in the context. It's a way that high-context speakers play games with low-context speakers.

In a high-context culture, most of the meaning is in the surrounding culture. In a low-context culture, the speaker puts the meaning into the words themselves and removes most ambiguity. Northern Europe, England, North America are all low-context cultures. France and the Latin cultures are high-context cultures. (I don't know about others.) But I do know that what John is doing is a game that the French enjoy playing with German-speakers.

John is speaking in code that only the insiders understand. It's a way of separating the in-group from the out-groups.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:35 AM    in reply to Richardxx

You're right. I think there's a lot of shadowboxing going on in these posts. We'll have to wait for the memoirs.

What did you mean by JFK?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:37 AM    in reply to Tanjaoui

I'm not getting those references either, but I know a lot less than most people here on legislative procedure and recent political events. I'm hoping to learn more...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

rwc

user-pic

October 16, 2009 1:19 PM    in reply to Richardxx

There may be some truth to what you say, but as an very interested observer of the political scene for the last 40 years, I've found that one is most often able to see where politicians are going by listening very carefully to what they are saying, and what Obama and his White House are saying (once again, I think Obama is the key player here, not Reid) leads me to believe they have no intention of pursuing a strong PO that will affect many people.

It may be that Obama really wanted a strong PO and the White House has taken the pulse of the Senate and found it to be mission impossible, and they are just seeking to prepare their progressive supporters for the ultimate letdown.

Or it may be power politics they are playing and they cut a deal with the insurance industry to kill or neuter the PO as a Robert Reich column several weeks ago said they did. The deal, as Reich explained it, was that in exchange for weakening or killing the PO, the insurance industry wouldn't fight the rest of the reforms and wouldn't fund their GOP opponents. The fact that it is confirmed that they cut a deal with Big Pharma months ago, and Rahm's reputation as a real politic deal cutter, and their rhetoric on the PO in the last few months, makes me think this latter scenario is the closest to the truth.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:29 PM   

Markos thinks he's the friggin bee's knees don't he! A bit tiresome from time to time

I'd do him tho

Neunundneunzing luftballons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsU8fRvTeCI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsU8fRvTeCI

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:44 AM    in reply to johnmccsf

John,

You're showing off and trying to connect with others who have a clue what you are talking about. Might be interesting, too, but I simply don't have the time and energy to hare off and waste my time on your game. I've forgotten most of the German I used to know and the music is rather pedestrian.

I don't like the ambiguity, either.

My concession to in-groups is to use contractions when I write. But that's my native language and my in-group.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 4:05 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Thoroughly OT:
I get his point, even if I don't think his approach is helping get it across.

But insofar as pedestrian music and inside baseball goes, 99 Luftballons is really neither.

I daresay it is the most popular anti-war song in human history - Top5 charts across most of Western Europe, AND the US. I almost forgot - it was on MTV every 45 minutes for damn near 6 months, smack dab in the middle of Reagan's two terms.
Context matters - Pershing II missiles across Western Europe pointed at SS-N-20s in the Warsaw Pact, DefCon3, Reagan's "the bombing starts in 5 minutes" gag, MX missiles and Star Wars - all years before START, INF, perestroika.
That was when the Evil Empire was real and not a rhetorical device to drum up support for a war of choice. They had more nuclear weapons than we did, and a belligerent determination to see us ground into dust. (The "missile gap" hadn't been dis-credited yet.)
Just in case you don't recall, speaking as someone who started high school in '84, that was a pretty fucking scary time(and that was here in the USA.) The duck-and-cover drills were a thing of the past - we all understood there would not be any surviving the fire and any fool could see the rattling sabres were already half-drawn.
In that respect the context is understood by the vast majority of the cohort - that being the 30-50 age group across the Americas and Western Europe.

If you want to draw an arc from that song to the Berlin Wall coming down, it would be hard to fully discredit that argument.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Luftballons

I guess some folks could argue that "Swing Low Sweet Chariot" is just a song. I would suggest they not do so around the family of any of scores of men and women murdered during the Civil Rights Movement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:34 PM    in reply to johnmccsf

Unless you have enough weed to share with everyone here, can it already.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:54 PM   

I think Snowe was big. A turning point.

HCR has go the momentum. That ugly thing that came out of the Finance Commitee is going to get better and better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:45 AM    in reply to JoeTheMechanic

You're right about that. It will get better.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 6:59 PM   

More likely he's working inside for big insurance. And how can he get kind words from progressives? Are there any progressives in the Senate?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:17 PM   

The reason people don't have a lot of faith in Harry is he's regularly been rolled like a drunk whore by the GOP and the Conservative wing of his own party. To the degree that you start to realize that he's neither drunk, nor a whore: he just enjoys hopping the sack with conservatives.

And there's nothing wrong with that if you're Ben Nelson.

But Harry is the Majority Leader. Our platform isn't exactly what Ben Nelson ran on in NE. One would prefer to see Harry find ways to get Ben's vote via good old fashioned pork rather than watering down good policy.

Or just cut off the pork. If Ben wants to jump to the GOP, go right ahead. No more nice handouts for Nebraska until Ben starts playing nice.

I'm all for the Big Tent. But part of the tent is to support Cloture. After that, vote away.

John

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 10:30 PM    in reply to tosh

By the look on your face,I'm surprised you, of all people, didn't recognize Reid has been using Ali's rope a dope technique all this time. I suspect he's figured it's about time to start punching back since his opponents has spent all their energies and have nothing to show for their efforts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:39 AM    in reply to tosh

Just curious: how has Reid jumped in the sack with conservatives? Not a challenge, just a question from someone hoping to learn.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:24 PM   

I'm looking forward to the excitement of the progressive base if Dems in Congress pass HCR with a solid public option.

If that happens...oh wow, Pres. Obama's victory lap speech on it will fire up the troops like nothing else. All bets would be off for 2010 - and all the "Republicans will slaughter Dems" memes will get a serious lashing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:45 PM    in reply to The BBQ Chicken Madness

"I'm looking forward to the excitement of the progressive base if Dems in Congress pass HCR with a solid public option."

It's happening. Unless TPM is running April Fool's stories.
Snowe
Pelosi
Reid

Dominoes. A flurry of punches. Nice to see it happening.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:31 PM    in reply to JoeTheMechanic

No seriously. We will be amped beyond belief. If they get this done with a strong PO, oh boy I am ready to go for 2010.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:51 AM    in reply to JoeTheMechanic

Joe
I think you see what is going on. It's messy, confusing and nasty, but it's going the way a lot of us want it to.

That's because we are watching the process and not just looking at the end product. This is not a mechanical process. It's an organic process.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:33 PM   

If Harry does it, I'll email mail him and tell him he doesn't really suck.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:48 PM    in reply to Winston Smith

I'll send him $2500 for his election fund if he can pull that off. Seriously.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:18 PM    in reply to wilson

And I'll send $2500.00 to his opponent if he doesn't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:54 AM    in reply to tonnyb

Send it to Harry if he does pull it off. It looks like he is going to need it. He appears to be sacrificing his Senate seat to get health care reform passed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:19 PM    in reply to wilson

Seriously!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:46 AM    in reply to Winston Smith

I'll send him 2500 hundred if he puts the public option in. And if he doesen't I will send 1000 to Grayson.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 7:52 PM   

Orin Hatch can see it happening too. He wants to kick somebody's teeth out. heh heh heh.. Aw, come on Orin, be a good sport. LOL!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:21 PM   

My opinions of pretty much every Democrat is being shaped by this HC fight. If Reid getts the job done.........I will have to give him the credit he deserves. If not.........Oh we are coming for him in 2010.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:27 PM   

I think what might happen is Dems in the House pass their robust PO HC bill based on Medicare rates and the Senate passes a PO with a trigger or opt in or opt out. Then in coference......this is a big if though, the compromise will be the PO based on negotiated rates. That's a PO I can live with and one we can build on for sure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:27 AM    in reply to theone718

As I understand it, the system of negotiated rates is the system the Germans have. The government negotiates with state level health care suppliers for the reimbursement rate every so often. It works quite well.

Medicare uses it's size to demand lower rates, but considering the fact that the rates the health care suppliers demand have to cover their losses for those who are uninsured as well as unnecessary insurance company administrative costs, excessive CEO salaries and excessive profits to satisfy Wall Street, (all built into overhead) who's to say that the Medicare reimbursement rates aren't about right to cover each individual case?

There's a hell of a lot of cost shifting built into the overhead of billed health care costs in the current system, and most of it results from (first) the health care provided to the uninsured, (second) the excessive administrative costs required by insurance companies to avoid paying benefits to people who have not paid them premiums and (third) the excessive costs of executive salaries and the Wall-Street-demanded level of profits. Remember the explanations for the charges of $15.00 for two aspirin given to an inpatient? It's all overhead, not direct cost.

Universal coverage should cause billed costs to be reduced to the actual cost of the service plus a reasonable but minimal overhead.

Medical suppliers who provide services to the uninsured should be reimbursed for nothing more than the actual direct cost of the services the provide. The current Medicare reimbursement rates rather closely approximate this. Reimbursement to the insured should cover reasonable overhead. Rural medical facilities should get subsidies to operate there, not as part of the payment-per-service.

Physicians who have to pay back their fantastically high student loans need to get forgiveness on those loans. That should not be built into the cost of services billed to the patient. It's a systematic cost, not a patient cost. When you look at the extensive period of time and cost required to train a physician it makes no sense to tack that cost onto the two aspirin given a hospital patient at 2:00 am in the morning. If nothing else, that's incompetent accounting. The decisions for the expenditures cannot be controlled by the payment. There is no logical connection.

This is, of course, not an argument I would even attempt in the main stream media. Most of you have already fogged out and ignored me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 2:33 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Good points! Noone is paying attention to the high costs of medical school, which is not a factor in Europe, as far as I know.

I wonder: in Germany, does the government negotiate with suppliers/delivery providers for both the government and private insurers?

I've also heard the Germans pool risk, so certain insurers don't have to take carry a preponderance of sick patients. Sounds fair.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 18, 2009 5:53 PM    in reply to Richardxx

Richardx, not only did I not fog out, I think I love you! ;) It's wonderful to read such well-spoken and informed writing. I just discovered this site today, am looking forward to checking it daily. I don't mean to short-change anyone else on here, but your entries are amazing. Thanks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:29 PM   

Harry Reid has to know his political career will end if he doesn't produce on the Public Option. No Public Option and he's done as Majority Leader and he's gone from the Senate. I'm inclined to believe this story.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:30 PM   

Once again I recommend Reid's autobiography "The Good Fight." He grew up poorer than you can imagine. There was NEVER money for a doctor or dentist. When his young brother got a broken arm he just had to go to bed and moan, for weeks. When the teenage Reid approached a dentist to give his mother false teeth, as all hers were gone, the dentist said you know I don't do charity. Reid was furious because he was going to work to provide his mother with teeth, and he did.

So--you think he might want a strong health bill, with a public option, for people?

I hope if he's successful he gets credit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:34 PM    in reply to jward

For a guy who as gone through such a rough life I don't understand why he acts like a spineless twit on occassions. This guy is a former boxer, you don't get in the ring knowing the other man wants to knock your face in if you are a bitch.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 10:33 PM    in reply to theone718

Tactics. Ever hear of rope a dope?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 8:51 PM   

He has had his moments in the past. I just can't think of what they were!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:38 AM    in reply to Tanjaoui

Stopped Bush's recess appointment game. Killed Yucca Mountain. That's two biggies (for America and Nevada respectively).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 2:43 PM    in reply to kgb999

That's one, but thought there was something else. He was really giving Bush some headaches about something, persistently, around 2005, 2006. Only so much you can do in the minority, but I was glad to see him driving Shrub to distraction!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:32 AM    in reply to Tanjaoui

He doesn't have a PR agency publicizing his successes. Unlike a lot of Senators, he's not running for President. Why should he tell us what he does? It would just detract from his ability to get things done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 9:20 PM   

Let's settle for the "opt out" public option, since its about the most we can hope for, and let the voters of states whose governors and legislatures choose ideology over promoting "the general welfare" deal with those elected officials through the ballot.

And if voters of a particular state choose to elect ideologues who choose to continue to protect private health insurers profits over a system in which we the citizens of the union, utilizing our government for one of its intended purposes, the promotion of the general welfare by providing their citizens with the least expensive, most transparent approach to ensuring health insurance for all, within a system subject to our political control, which private health insurers are most decidedly not, then they deserve to pay higher premiums and have coverage denied when they are seriously ill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 10:38 PM    in reply to Chris Brown

Screw that! It's because of States we're in the mess to begin with! McCarran-Fregesson Act gave the insurance cartel get out of monopoly prosecution free cards so the Feds could touch them and them ran roughshod over State governments. best thing for all of us would be for the Feds to run the entire program and tell the States what to do and give the public access to the legislative process for a change.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 9:26 PM   

We fight for the best, not for a weakened bill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 9:27 PM   

We fight for the best, not for a weakened bill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 10:04 PM   

When Reid actually delivers something, I'll consider cutting him some slack. As far as I can tell, it was only the heavy pressure by the progressive community that has caused him to act at this juncture. Whether that causes permanent spine growth, or it's just a momentary aberration, is the question. Frankly, given how he responded to being called out by Chuck Schumer argues that the latter is the case.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 4:10 AM    in reply to dougom

It's our role to pressure him. He *is* facing losing his Senate seat by supporting health care. You expect him to do that *without* pressure?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 2:14 PM    in reply to Overreach THIS!

I'm a naive pessimist (or a cynical optimist; you choose); I like to think that, when confronted with a nation-wide disaster--Katrina, a world war, a great depression, 40 million uninsured Americans--"our" public servants will put aside their petty, power-based, self-interested squabbling and try to do the right thing.

Like I said: naive.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 10:26 PM   

Not to pee on anyone's parade, but I'd believe this more if anyone had been willing to be named.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 15, 2009 10:43 PM   

Given the players and the stakes, it makes sense that you wouldn't reveal your hand til the last possible moment. Not only that, if the opposition thinks that they have already won, then they'll be less inclined to devise creative roadblocks to stop the impending legislation. Nothing better to do that than see the more excitable liberals howling in angst about how they've been "betrayed".

Doesn't help the confidence of those who are looking for good news, but it does reduce the targets that the opposition can use to take shots at.

When the final bill is passed, we'll know what was happening behind the scenes. Til then everything is speculation. Including this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:43 AM    in reply to Homefries

Very good points. They also explain why none of the real information regarding what is really going on in the Senate appears in the Press.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:04 AM   

Wwe're just all so weary of being betrayed by our own Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:52 AM    in reply to xargaw

Which party is that?

Don't tell me Democrat or Republican. Those don't matter beyond just being alliances among politicians who want to get elected/reelected. There's not more than 10% - tops - up there who wouldn't switch to protect their seat just as Jeffords and Spector have. Almost everyone of them is there because of their ambition rather than their ideology.

If you believe otherwise you have bought into their Public Relations crap.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 11:25 AM    in reply to Richardxx

October 16, 2009 11:08 AM in reply to Richardxx

"Which party is that?
Don't tell me Democrat or Republican."

I couldn't agree with you more! The re-election concerns of those within the Senate is THE ONLY MOTIVATING FORCE FOR CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS... (as well as Republicans)...

The simply truth is that if these Senators were REALLY concerned about cutting health care costs and creating the system that would REALLY benefit the general population as a whole, this issue would be moot and either a single-payer system, a true "public option", and/or a general opportunity to buy into the current Medicare Program, would have been enacted by now...

1. The "public option" actually would save $125 billion, compared to any other "option" available - (yet there is endless debate to water that concept down and/or even whether to include this proposal at all -- Does this really need to be debated if you are a Democrat???)...

2. Elimination of the McCarran-Fregesson Act, which is the health insurance provider's exemption from anti-trust legislation, would curtail the strangle-hold of the cartel, and opens competition - (Does that need to be debated by a Democrat???)...

3. Many justifications have been made that conservative Democrats need to be re-elected to give the Party a majority in the Senate - (What good is the having majority when these same conservatives consistently and repeatedly block or hinder the very platform of the Party that keeps supporting them for office???)...

4. Granted, Reid's power over specific Senators may be limited, but he does have the power to insert the "public option" into the main bill on the Senate floor and it would take 60 votes to REMOVE it; if not included into the bill by Reid, then the amendment process kicks in and it would require 60 votes to add the "public option" over a filibuster... (So in this regard Reid does hold all the cards -- whether he plays them is what is the question!!!)... (I'm a betting person, and I would bet that he doesn't...)

5. Senator Reid could easily make PUBLIC the names of Senators who have vowed to join the Republicans in a potential filibuster - (and that is totally within his discretion)... Will he? If not, why not???

Until Reid accomplishes something, I withhold a final judgement... (To date, he has shown me very little to perceive him as a forceful LEADER)...

6. I do add however, that our President could do much more to support the "public option" and yet remains silent, while at the same time lavishing praise on Sen. Snowe, who is an absolute foe to it... (Just something that makes me ponder where he really is coming from...)

Just remember that "how goes this health insurance reform, so goes the Democratic Party"...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 12:46 AM   

Believe it when it happens - not before.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:22 AM   

Harry's gotten screwed by LIEbertwit and Baucus in the past and Gephardt in the past and the Bush people so I am sorry if I don't buy this Harry-love right now. I used to like Harry and defend him but no more. Also too, I think LIEbertwit had nekkid pictures of Harry with a live girl not his wife.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 4:15 AM   

Even Pelosi's "comes out swinging" statement suggests a lot of us will be disappointed:

This is about going into that room and coming out with the best coverage and the lowest cost for America's working families. I believe that that is best achieved by going to the table with the public option.

You go to table with public option and leave with what you can get, as she says.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 5:28 AM   

This will certainly be a defining moment for Harry Reid. The "ball is in his court" or whatever cliche you want to use.

If he can negotiate a strong public option, it'll be a huge boost for the Democrats and especially for him.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 5:58 AM   

More noise.

What this entire HC debate is REALLY about, is who will dominate the the agenda and direction of the Democratic Party moving forward; the progressive base or the moderate center.

Democrats cannot win elections without the base.

But its worse than that. If the Democrats cannot get at least a strong PO (or something like it) in the exchanges, SOMEONE will have to be blamed.

And what you'll see, is the progressive base actively working for the defeat of those its blamed in 2010. To try to get the blue dogs and conserva dems, OUT of the Party. Even if it means handing a few elections over to the Republicans.

We are witnessing a similar dynamic at work on the Republican side, RIGHT NOW.

That is why you see many progressives demanding to know WHO is conducting silent filibusters on HC and the PO, within the Democratic Caucus in the Senate.

And its also why this is taking so long. Everyone is running for cover and trying to blame everyone and anyone but themselves.

"Disappointing" the base of the Democratic Party does not even closely approach the shit storm that will be unleashed should a strong PO (or something like it) NOT make it into the final legislation.

Just speaking for me only.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 8:55 AM   

Something tells me Sue Lowden has more to do with this than Reid suddenly finding his balls.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 10:55 AM   

Everytime I sign an online petition urging Harry Reid to action, I write the same three-word message: "Grow a spine."

As disgusted as I am with our waffling majority leader, I would be impressed if he (finally) marshals his power for a strong public option.

Give us something good, Harry. As a reward, I personally vow to go to Nevada and work on your reelection bid. This is that important.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 11:27 AM    in reply to Jacksonian

Brian-

I object to your use of the term "whipping boy" to describe the relationship between progressives and Reid. A whipping boy is someone who is punished for someone else's wrongdoing. Almost like a scapegoat. Are you saying Reid is does not have any responsibility or control over legislation? The use of that term implies that you do. I would accept "punching bag" or even "pariah," since those don't necessarily imply innocence, and maybe that's more of what you mean-- Reid does take a lot of heat from progressives, no doubt. But what you're saying with the "whipping boy" metaphor is that he doesn't deserve any part of it. Do you really feel that way?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 11:19 AM   

and just who are your sources Brian ?

this carries more than a whiff of the cheerleading and pom pom waving we've come to expect from the Common Purpose/Unity 09 coffee klatsch - you may have been rolled

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 1:37 PM    in reply to izzatxeaux

and oh what a shock - "anonymous Senate aides" today (fri) saying 'the merged Senate bill may not contain a public option'

it's what we so called hardliners call working the yo-yo

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 16, 2009 11:42 AM   

I'll believe in Reid's leadership just as soon as I see some. Leadership, that is.

So far, I'm not a believer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 17, 2009 1:58 PM   

I think there will be a public option. I think it will be "watered down" in some way as there clearly aren't enough votes for the more robust option.

I believe the opt-out is the smartest compromise that I've heard and has renewed my faith in the Left to actually strategize and win a political battle. Will this mean that the "all-or-nothing" folks on the Left will throw a tantrum and stomp off to their respective corners and hold the breath until they realize the rest of us have moved on? Yes.

If Progressives are going to be major players in governing, they are going to have to learn to deal with all the members of the governing coalition and that means compromising and even sometimes having to get a Republican vote or two.

If health care reform helps millions of people, that's a win. If we are serious about becoming part of a permanent governing majority (remember that one?)then we'll stay in power and continue to get more and better reform. That's how it was done with the Social Security program as well as other programs we like and believe in.

I believe Leader Reid knows that he must deliver on some the of PO and will do so. In the end, I also believe that the other reforms that many don't seem to even care about will end up exciting the electorate more than the PO. As time goes on, the scope, or maybe the number of states with the PO, will continue to increase. Those who cannot do long-term will just have to huff and puff and try to bring the whole house down around everyone.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on