
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), whose vote would most likely be necessary to break a Republican filibuster on health care reform, said Thursday that he's "inclined to let the motion to proceed."
But, he added, "I haven't decided yet."
The New Haven Register reported Lieberman's remarks today. Lieberman said earlier this week that he doesn't support the Senate Finance Committee's version of the bill.
Lieberman votes in the Democratic caucus and counts as one of the 60 Democrats.
As Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) said today, something like the public option won't need 60 votes. Democrats only need 60 votes to break the filibuster -- but the final vote on the bill only needs 51 votes.
"It is conceivable that some Democrats, for example, would vote to break the filibuster who would then vote against the bill," Frank told Joy Behar on Headline News.
jerryfatheart
October 16, 2009 4:34 PM
Go ahead, Droopy. We dare you.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jzap
October 17, 2009 2:00 AM in reply to jerryfatheart
It's hard to imagine Joe LieberSchmuck (Likud-Aetna&Cigna) not doing everything he can to protect his homeboys' interests.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
October 16, 2009 4:43 PM
Reid says he's with us, except on the war. Otherwise, I'm sure there is a Dem who would like his chairmanship.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
October 16, 2009 4:44 PM
I said so yesterday.....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
October 16, 2009 4:48 PM
Harkin voices support for opt-out
It's been up at HuffPo for hours but Beutler's still unsticking his keyboard after watching a Reid slam that no body else will see
Posted his tripe twice
Back on Planet Earth
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
October 16, 2009 4:55 PM
Hopefully, he's gotten the message loud and clear that if he doesn't vote for cloture, he loses his chairmanships.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
October 16, 2009 6:08 PM in reply to Moose49
Sounds right, Moose, yes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 16, 2009 4:57 PM
As Ronaldus Grenadicus said, "trust but verify." Okay, on second thought, just verify. There's no trusting him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kash79
October 16, 2009 6:28 PM
Lib is back yet it, with the blackmailing card?
He threatens to jump off the bridge, may be, may be not game to keep himself relevant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 16, 2009 7:49 PM
Translation: "Hadassah threatened to cut me off if I didn't protect her insurance and pharmaceutical clients. I'm inclined to think that's a good thing."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Tanjaoui
October 17, 2009 6:44 PM
It's the progressives who need to threaten disunity: no public option, no cloture. All it would take is one or two: Rocky, Schumer, Sanders. I hope they're laying down the law.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?