With a 60-seat majority in the Senate, Democrats are poised, theoretically, to prevent Republicans from filibustering key agenda items. Liberals and health care reformers see that as a potential bulwark against Republican obstruction and are pressuring party leaders to enforce unanimity on key cloture votes, so that nominations and major bills (like health care) can be decided by a simple majority. And just how are they doing on that score?
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE), one of the Senate's most visible centrists, tells me leadership hasn't said anything about it to him.
I asked, "Has leadership been in discussions with you and other moderates about voting with the party on procedural votes?"
In a statement that will bedevil liberals, he responded, "I don't know about others, but not with me."
I have a call out to Dem leadership for comment.
Nelson has long insisted that his vote on procedural questions is "not on autopilot," and repeated that insistence today. That's not surprising from Nelson, who, has previously used his leverage as one of the party's most conservative members to move its legislation to the right.
I asked him whether he'd decided to support or oppose a filibuster of Justice Department nominee Dawn Johnsen--whose confirmation has been held up since March--and he replied, "not yet. But I certainly haven't decided if I'm going to vote for cloture."
Late Update: A senior Democratic aide says that leadership has indeed briefed the caucus about voting with the party on procedural votes. Maybe Nelson was talking about one-on-one meetings?

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

ttarleton
October 6, 2009 3:18 PM
Bite my shiny green ass, Nelson!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
miasmo
October 6, 2009 3:23 PM
Wow! Either Nelson is lying or the Dem leadership is beyond lame. Unbelievable! Or, more sadly, believable. It's enough to make us little people start to think that the whole thing is just a big charade. Maybe we should just go ahead and bust out the torches and pitchforks.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
October 6, 2009 3:30 PM in reply to miasmo
"torches and pitchforks"
Now you're talkin! It's the only way the average schmoe ever has or ever will get anything out of the wealthy and powerful.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
October 6, 2009 3:31 PM in reply to miasmo
"torches and pitchforks"
Now you're talkin! It's the only way the average schmoe ever has or ever will get anything out of the wealthy and powerful.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
October 6, 2009 3:40 PM in reply to oleeb
Just a historical note: the Senate is supposed to represent the wealthy. The House is "the people's house."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
October 7, 2009 4:23 PM in reply to Schmed
Actually that is incorrect. The Senate is supposed to be removed from the emotions and passions of common public opinion. It was intended to be an institution where the long view could be considered and where cooler heads could prevail in a time of great stress. It has nothing whatever to do with wealth. Never did.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
October 6, 2009 3:57 PM in reply to miasmo
Exactly. Either way, it's pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tosh
October 6, 2009 5:01 PM in reply to miasmo
"Either Nelson is lying or the Dem leadership is beyond lame."
Both.
John
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Gator_fan
October 6, 2009 3:34 PM
Good.
He's up in 2010. Let him filibuster health care and rake in insurance company money and vote FOR the bailout and see if his ass isn't grass come Nov. 2010.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 6, 2009 3:48 PM in reply to Gator_fan
He'd likely have a much better paying job waiting for him in the insurance industry if he killed reform now and it cost him his seat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
October 6, 2009 3:58 PM in reply to Gator_fan
Ben Nelson is not up for re-election until 2012.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 6, 2009 3:47 PM
It also could be a case where they know certain Senators would dig in and push back if pressured. If the Dems could get 58-59 cloture votes I don't think Nelson would be willing to filibuster.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
October 6, 2009 4:05 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I'm sure the leadership is thinking that making Nelson publicly support Cloture now allows too much time for Nelson to bend under pressure from the right.
Twisting his arm at the last second is probably the best bet. (Or second best, not dependiing on him at all is the best bet)
Besides, Blanche Lincoln (D-WalMart) won't come into line anyway, so why push two senators publicly to still lose their votes. Lets not forget Landrieu either.
Reid may be weak but not completely stupid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 6, 2009 3:57 PM
Okay, so no talks about voting for cloture generally. Right.
So, has he had any talks with leadership about voting for cloture even if he can't vote for certain specific bills like, say, oh, I don't know, maybe the health care reform bill?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
btbradley86
October 6, 2009 4:01 PM
Folks, this is exactly why Harry Reid wont win reelection out here in Nevada. Republicans have never liked him (even though he's pro gun rights and pro-life) and Democrats are soooo tired of watching Reid's spine splash around on the floor. Get the votes to stop the fillibuster and then give it an "up or down vote". HEY WAIT...."up or down vote", isnt that what the Repubs were screaming they deserved and how unpatriotic it was to not give them one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
October 6, 2009 4:18 PM in reply to btbradley86
Upperdown! Upperdown! Upperdown!
Or the nuclear option.
Either way.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
October 6, 2009 5:41 PM in reply to mjshep
Be careful what you wish for. At this point, a robust PO would likely be down.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chucktrotter
October 6, 2009 5:13 PM in reply to btbradley86
""Reid may be weak but not completely stupid.""
This guy couldn't lead me out of a burning building!
“There is hardly any one so insignificant that he does not seem imposing to some one at some time.”
Charles Horton Cooley
I think Reid disproves Cooley's affirmation!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Micheline
October 6, 2009 4:20 PM
I'll say wait and see.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Forsythe
October 6, 2009 4:23 PM
Roll Call sez:
So someone's not telling the truth here.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 6, 2009 4:44 PM in reply to Forsythe
Well, if this is true, then it sounds like Ben's crying out for some attention from those very same Democratic leaders. . .
Wonder why that might be?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
October 6, 2009 5:07 PM in reply to CT Voter
Of course. Why would he announce his vote far in advance? He just gives up any leverage he has. I knew this story would get people's shorts all bunched up.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jah627
October 7, 2009 9:54 AM in reply to mans_best_friend
Exactly -- question is, what is his price? ("How 'bout a nice fat corn subsidy, Ben?")
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 6, 2009 5:00 PM in reply to Forsythe
Not at all. Roll Call says they've asked all 60 to let a vote on health care come to a vote. Brian asked Nelson "Has leadership been in discussions with you and other moderates about voting with the party on procedural votes?" Brian asked Nelson about the enforcement of party loyalty generally, not whether he'd been whipped on the one bill.
If leadership has only talked to Nelson about the cloture vote on the one bill specifically, the narrowly truthful answer to Brian's general question to Nelson would be "no."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mateo123
October 6, 2009 4:33 PM
The leaders aren't telling the truth. They assert this to please the small-dollar individual contributors like many on this blog. "See," they can say, "we tried to overcome a filibuster but, well, Nellie wouldn't budge." Please. It's small. It's weak. It's pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 6, 2009 4:53 PM in reply to Mateo123
Concern trolling much?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
October 6, 2009 5:13 PM
If he wasn't from ruby red Nebraska I would primary him myself./
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
October 6, 2009 8:21 PM
Let's put it this way, Ben. Why would you vote to sustain a Republican filibuster if you weren't just a whore for the insurance companies?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Agathena
October 7, 2009 4:47 AM
This ugly man took over one million from insurance companies and now he is working day and night to prevent Americans from having health care. One ugly and on-the-take man should not have that much power.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Agathena
October 7, 2009 4:58 AM
Verification:
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?