Obama Boasts of Bipartisan Support For Health Care Reform -- And Shames The Opposition
In this weekend's YouTube address, President Obama proudly touted the support for health care from prominent Republicans such as Bob Dole, Bill Frist, Mike Bloomberg, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Louis Sullivan and Tommy Thompson -- and contrasted this with the opposition from other Republicans in Washington:
"These distinguished leaders understand that health insurance reform isn't a Democratic issue or a Republican issue, but an American issue that demands a solution," said Obama. "Still, there are some in Washington today who seem determined to play the same old partisan politics, working to score political points, even if it means burdening this country with an unsustainable status quo."
LeMieux: Dem Health Care Solutions Worse Than The Problems
In this weekend's Republican address, the recently appointed Sen. George LeMieux (R-FL) attacked the Democratic health care proposals as being worse than the current problems:
"We in the Congress have a duty to tackle this problem, but the solution we settle upon should not be rushed, and the solution should not be worse than the problem we are trying to solve," said LeMieux. "Right now, Senate Democrats and White House officials are behind closed doors crafting their final health care overhaul proposal. While the Democrats in Congress have not yet provided the actual language of their proposed law, we do know enough for Americans to be concerned."
Obama Speaking To Gay Rights Dinner
President Obama will be speaking tonight at the Human Rights Campaign national dinner, at 8 p.m. ET. Vice President Biden and his wife Jill are spending the weekend in Massachusetts and New York, and do not have any scheduled public events this weekend.
Axelrod Warns Against Quick Decisions On Afghanistan
White House senior adviser David Axelrod spoke in Lincoln, Nebraska, and warned against a quick decision on Afghanistan. "I think we all ought to be grateful that on a matter of this gravity, we have a president who is giving real thought to the right way forward," said Axelrod. He also added: "We've tried it the other way and it didn't work."
Palin Spokeswoman: Bob McDonnell Once Wanted Her Help, But Not Anymore
Sarah Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton told the Washington Post that Virginia GOP gubernatorial nominee Bob McDonnell personally asked for Palin's help campaigning this past Summer -- but that by August, Palin's staff was notified that her help was no longer wanted. "The Governor, SarahPAC, and I have all communicated to the candidate, the campaign and to the RGA the Governor's continued willingness to assist in any way possible - even as recently as two weeks ago," said Stapleton.
Barney Frank: Gay Rights Marsh "A Waste of Time At Best"
Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) sharply criticized this weekend's gay rights march in Washington this weekend, declaring it "a waste of time at best" and saying that time would be better spent by gay rights activists lobbying their elected officials. "The only thing they're going to be putting pressure on is the grass," said Frank.
DNC Ad Touts Republican Support For Health Care Reform
The Democratic National Committee has a new national TV ad, echoing President Obama in touting the support from prominent Republicans for health insurance reform and shaming the majority of Republicans who oppose it:
"But some Republicans are siding with the insurance companies, and just saying 'no' to health insurance reform," the announcer says. "Tell Republicans, just saying 'no' isn't a solution"

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

johnmccsf
October 10, 2009 1:31 PM
Obama's ready to kick butt on HC reform
I worry about that 60th vote
I worry about Lieberman
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Micheline
October 10, 2009 1:54 PM in reply to johnmccsf
I don't trust Lieberman especially since he said he's open to running as a Republican.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 10, 2009 2:01 PM in reply to Micheline
And he'll lose his chairmanship come the 2010 election (you couldn't strip it until then without 60 votes in the Senate). Furthermore the Dems will still have the majority in the Senate so there would be no chairmanships they could even offer him then. Finally Lieberman will be voted out in 2012 unless he becomes a Republican and they clear the primary field for him, because he'd lose the GOP primary if Gov. Rell ran against him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
October 10, 2009 3:24 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
You don't need 60 votes to strip Lieberman because it's a matter strictly for the Democratic caucus, not the entire senate. If the majority of Democrats vote to strip him, it's done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lestatdelc
October 11, 2009 2:25 AM in reply to FreeRider
Wrong. Organizing resolutions require a full floor vote, and 60 to end debate. Usually it is done by unanimous consent since the leadership works it out with the minority ahead of time. Rearranging committee assignments isn't a caucus only thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
October 12, 2009 12:06 PM in reply to Lestatdelc
Bullshit. You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a caucus decision, not a decision for the entire Senate. When they voted on whether to strip Lieberman of his chair, ONLY the Democratic caucus voted.
Look it up.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 10, 2009 1:57 PM
Oooo McDonnell snubs Palin. I wonder if Deeds could some how make that news in Va without being linked to the pushing of it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 10, 2009 2:05 PM
THat item about Palin is very interesting. And it will be more interesting to see what happens during next year's campaign season.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 10, 2009 2:18 PM in reply to CT Voter
I understand it though, because Palin would be asked about McDonnell's thesis. Wasn't the thesis uncovered in August? The same time the invitation to Palin was pulled. Or it could have been because Palin quit office I guess and having somebody endorse you for Governor who quit being Governor herself could send a bad message.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 10, 2009 2:49 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
But if Sarah Palin is the super solid rock star that wingers think she is, one might imagine that she'd be pulled in. Evidently McDonnell realizes that she's a rock star for only a subset of his voters.
And her book is coming out this fall. Wouldn't it have a wider audience if it came out during a full-fledged political season? Wonder if someone else is writing a tell-all that is due to come out, say, in January? And that's why Palin hurried through this one?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
October 10, 2009 3:34 PM in reply to CT Voter
What's mostly interesting to me here:
McDonnell has gotten into a place where he's being slammed for being anti-woman.
All other things being equal, you'd think that a fantastic way to address this would be to get some prominent Republican women to come out and campaign for you.
Instead here we are seeing the opposite. McDonnell wants Palin to come out and campaign for him, then all of a sudden when he needs among other things to avoid seeming anti-woman, his reaction is to start avoiding Palin.
I think this little fact says something extremely interesting about Sarah Palin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ann Arbor
October 10, 2009 5:44 PM in reply to mcc
It's also interesting that Palin's flack went public, on the record, in such detail. Is this another case of Palin thinking the world revolves around her? Don't snub me, or you'll pay, buster!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
October 10, 2009 7:11 PM in reply to Ann Arbor
Yeah. The Palin camp seems to think sharing this information hurts McDonnell more than it hurts them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluesplashy
October 10, 2009 8:42 PM in reply to mcc
True but this is what I find interesting - Stapleton still calling Palin the Governor. Is that what they do with ex governors?
I think Palin is just ffed up. First she won't go to any Republican Political Meetings because she only wants to go where she is paid, then she complains because she doesn't get to endose a GOP candidate. It doens't matter what the story is, she complains about not getting enough attention.
Is she fading away? Please please please make it so!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 11, 2009 3:23 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
I understand it though, because Palin would be asked about McDonnell's thesis.
I think it's more that where McDonnell is losing support is mostly among women in Northern Virginia, and Palin would not sit well with the very women he is trying to win over, or at least to keep from losing any more of. Of course, the reason that he is losing support there is because of the sorts of things had was advocating in his thesis, so yes, I think this is tied to that, but for slightly different reasons than you were suggesting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
October 10, 2009 3:35 PM
Armies and empires have failed in Afghanistan for hundreds of years. The only way forward in Afghanistan is to back out. Quickly and safely. This was not Obama's war. It was Bush's failure. He should not allow it to become his failure, too.
Lives are being wasted.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
October 10, 2009 3:50 PM in reply to theWalrus
I disagree. The Taliban needs to be negotiated with, and there are rumblings that is in fact what is happening right now. Just like the surge was paying off the Sunni's, the Taliban would negotiate a cease fire and amnesty for their fighters whereby if they laid down their weapons and swore off extremism they could have a seat at the table and a say in the future of a democratic Afghanistan.
If this agreement could be reached, America could focus on AQ, with the vast majority of Afghanistan becoming relatively peaceful over night.
The Taliban is emboldened by talk of withdrawal - if they keep on fighting and killing they feel that America will lose it's will and they'd take over Afghanistan and kill all those who worked with Americans, control the country and be a haven for extremists plotting against America and her allies. If they feel that America will stay and fight them, they might be more willing to negotiate a cease fire.
Also The US has to keep a sizeable presence in Afghanistan to have a rapid response ready should Pakistan fall. Alos their presence in Afghanistan keeps the AQ militants surrounded in the mountains separating Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AnswerFrog
October 10, 2009 4:15 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
It's just an impossibly hard problem. It seems impossible to rebuild Afghanistan and make it a viable country not prone to radicals. I'm not sure America has the will or money to nationbuild such a failed state. And then there is Pakistani meddling, which makes it doubly hard. We obviously need a way to deal with Al Qaeda without owning all of Afghanistan's many many many problems. I don't see many easy answers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
KeithL
October 11, 2009 7:15 AM in reply to AnswerFrog
It IS an impossible problem, young Kermit. That is because Afghanistan is a fiction invented by Imperial powers.
In 1996, approximately 40 percent of Afghans were Pashtun, 11.4 of whom are of the Durrani tribal group and 13.8 percent of the Ghilzai group. Tajiks make up the second largest ethnic group with 25.3 percent of the population, followed by Hazaras, 18 percent; Uzbeks, 6.3 percent; Turkmen, 2.5 percent; Qizilbash, 1.0; 6.9 percent other.
The natural (to them) form of government is the jirga, NOT foreign imposed, corrupt, nepotistic, "Congresses" and "Presidents". They don't speak the same language, share religious or cultural practices and fight constantly whenever they have no foreign invaders to repel. Illiteracy in around 90% and poverty is literally lethal.
Until we stop trying to spread democracy like super-patriotic peanut butter on all parts of the world where they either don't like us or have never heard of us, our economy will continue to be flushed down the revolving door, MCC (Military Contractor Cabal).
We simply HAVE TO REVERSE the rise, IN OUR OWN COUNTRY, of:
Fascism, a radical and AUTHORITARIAN nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology. and DEAL with the rest of the world as a MEMBER of the community, NOT the master.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theWalrus
October 10, 2009 5:50 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
You seem to have it all neatly figured out. You also seem to be confusing and conflating the Taliban and al Quaeda. Do you honestly believe the Taliban, content to live in the 10th century, are interested in democracy and agreements? Seriously, dude.
Besides, just who appointed the United States the bringer of Democracy (by force) to every nation in the world? Democracy isn't exactly working very well here. Let's put our energies and focus on making THIS country a better place and continue diplomacy, economic sanctions and economic aid to other countries - not wasted lives and senseless warmongering.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minne sconsin
October 11, 2009 11:28 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
Substitute "Viet Cong" for "Taliban", and you're got your typical right-wing talking point, circa 1968.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jason everett miller
October 12, 2009 10:16 AM in reply to Minne sconsin
Except, of course, it was a war escalated by democratic presidents because the Domino Theory was decidedly non-partisan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mageduley
October 10, 2009 3:55 PM
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JimmyBobby
October 10, 2009 4:59 PM
Dear Sen. Le Mieux: if the Republicans want to propose a fully fleshed out and operational health care reform package, I think we'd all be more than glad to listen to it. The problem is, the Republicans' solution to the health care crisis (whose existence they do acknowledge) is to throw spitwads at the real, substantive proposals being made by the Democrats and the Administration. Senator, that just doesn't cut it as a policy platform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
afisher
October 10, 2009 5:50 PM
LeMieux has finally received his talking points memo from the right...is he mimicking Bachmann in her call for a 3month (no, that is not a misprint) delay so that she can read legislation prior to discussing it.
The Tom Price proposal ( GOP's biggest HCR plan) is on the Open Congress website (but kudos to TPM for posting it here months ago)... it's only 268 pages. After you read all the limitations, then check out how he will pay for it (offsets): eliminate TARP and ARRA...but no far reaching plan past that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 11, 2009 3:17 AM in reply to afisher
Didn't the Democrats at some point (around 2004 or 2005) try to get the Republicans to agree to require something like 24 or 48 hours between the time a bill was printed up and the time it was voted on, to allow members an opportunity during normal waking hours to read it before voting on it? And the Republicans flat-out refused, preferring to be able to rush things like the PATRIOT Act through in the middle of the night before the ink was dry on the final proofs?
And now they're insisting on 3 months? Chutzpah does not begin to describe it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fkaZk0sm0
October 10, 2009 6:33 PM
"The only thing they're going to be putting pressure on is the grass."
i
when it comes to dadt and gay rights in general, i always defer to congressman frank. i have no reason to doubt his commitment and every reason to respect his political acumen.
and i know that he'll tell it like it is with unmatched wit.
there are plenty of things i can fault obama for but dadt isn't one of them. yet.
when barney frank says we wait until 2010 for dadt, i say 2009 is time for keeping the pressure on but not the time for losing patience.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TJF
October 10, 2009 11:10 PM
LeMieux??
I stopped caring what the French think in 2003. They're Old Europe.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
zeeshan809
October 11, 2009 7:37 AM
No matterr how much the President might try, right wingers are never gonna support him, but will always try to find faults in him.
http://next-world-war.blogspot.com
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?