TPMDC

Obama Speaking To Human Rights Campaign, WH Says He Wants Progress In 'Coming Weeks'

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

President Obama tonight will address the Human Rights Campaign National Dinner in Washington, speaking about his commitment to gay rights even as the community is frustrated about lack of action on Don't Ask, Don't Tell, among other things.

The White House said the president will speak for 15 to 20 minutes, and hinted he might make some promises about speedy action.

"He looks forward to speaking directly with the LGBT community about the steps his administration has taken thus far and the progress he hopes to achieve in the coming weeks and months," said White House spokesman Shin Inouye.

Earlier this week, Obama named an openly gay lawyer to be his ambassador to Samoa and New Zealand.

This summer just before Obama was about to address gay Democratic activists, he extended some benefits to the partners of gay federal workers.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Obama will discuss the Hate Crimes measure that may pass Congress, saying the protections are "long overdue"

"[He] looks forward to, when that legislation gets to his desk, signing it and making that the law of the land," Gibbs said.

Join the Conversation!

14 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

mcc

user-pic

October 10, 2009 7:05 PM   

C-SPAN is going to have live broadcast/streaming of Obama's talk tonight, if anyone's interested. It starts at 7:55 eastern time (i.e. in under an hour).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 10, 2009 8:09 PM    in reply to mcc

Thank you so much-- I would have had to track this down later, but you made it easy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 10, 2009 9:11 PM   

This is bullshit. Obama could end DADT tomorrow if he wanted to. He's blowing smoke up our asses. He's not doing shit because he doesn't want to do shit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 10, 2009 9:34 PM    in reply to dragnet

He plays chess, you play Checkers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 10, 2009 11:38 PM    in reply to musgrove

BS. We expect leadership, he provides none. He's treating gay issues just like he treats the public option; high minded speeches and no commitments, no action, wait for somebody else to lead. Any wonder he's taking so long to make a decision on Afghanistan?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 11, 2009 8:09 AM    in reply to musgrove

That makes some sense. But can you tell me why he is playing chess here? More specifically what is the political equation that requires him to go slow on DADT, when he has promised it in his campaign, so it wouldn't have come as a big surprise (by waiting he has made it a bigger issue than 5 months ago) and he has political cover from some generals. What is his (or our) gain from the crawl? This question is intended seriously.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 11, 2009 12:51 PM    in reply to VLaszlo

Act. Of. Congress.

It will take an act of Congress.

I don't get what's so hard to understand about that concept to the kind of people who comment on political blogs.

To repeal DADT he has to ask Congress to do it, get someone to sponsor the bill, push to make sure it gets through the armed services committees and then to a floor vote and push the Blue Dogs to vote for it. He has to put his political capital behind it and push hard because, for a Democrat from a conservative state or district, it will be treated like THE most important vote ever cast in the history of the Republic next election day and their bladder control will be iffy. The Republicans will be screaming their idiot heads off about the imminent Desolation of the Abomination and raising bunches of cash on it. The MSM will be obsessing about it as the most important story of the hour. Anything else he might be doing, like, say, trying to get health care and climate legislation or, yes, even something as pedestrian as trying to keep the financial industry from starting another round of catastrophic speculation, falls by the wayside.

Jesus, people, try to remember back as far as 1993. The reason we have DADT is because Clinton decided repealing the ban on homosexuality in the military would be a quick, easy win and, thus, one of the first things he'd do. The gigantic ratfuck that ensued as a result of that miscalculation was a major contributing factor to the failure of health care reform. DADT was the best outcome he could engineer out of the debacle and, lest we forget, it was progress over what we had before.

Some have criticized Obama for overlearning the lessons of the Clinton years, possibly with some justice. But damn, think about how catastrophic it would be if he repeated him. Think what the media meme would be about him, and about Democrats. "Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result." Ring any bells?

Things have changed. It will be easier this time, but only after he's put some wins on the board on the other big issues he's working now. If he does it before then, there's at least a reasonable case to be made that he's risking losing on everything. If he does it now, and it sounds like he may be about to do so, that's the risk he's taking.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 11, 2009 5:31 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Thanks. Is it possible for Obama to change the DADT policy in his role of Commander-in-Chief (in wartime, no less)?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 11, 2009 6:00 PM    in reply to VLaszlo

I think Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in his role as C-in-C. I think that measure was much more controversial relatively speaking than changing DADT, or not?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 10, 2009 9:43 PM    in reply to dragnet

No... he could implement a stop-loss program starting tomorrow that would forbid discharges under DADT, but even that might get challenged and held up in court. Any repeal of DADT would need to be an act of Congress to ensure that a future administration can't revoke it at its whim. Executive Orders are not all-powerful.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 11, 2009 2:31 AM    in reply to The Emperor

Bingo! The Sturm und Drang of Obama not moving on DADT would be almost comical if it was a serious issue. I say that as an unapologetic non-heterosexual Democratic activist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 11, 2009 12:16 PM    in reply to dragnet

DADT is a statute (10 U.S.C. § 654), not a regulation or an executive order. It takes an act of Congress to repeal an act of Congress.

He's President of the United States, not Dictator of the Universe. He could ask Congress to repeal it tomorrow and you can criticize him for not doing that yet if you want to criticize him for something, but he can't just wave his hand in the air and abolish an act of Congress, no matter what you might have been led to believe by the way Bush and Cheney talked and acted.

If this was really important to you, one would think you'd know what it was you were against.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 10, 2009 11:21 PM   

Oy! are you short-sighted or what?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 12, 2009 8:08 AM   

sheesh. sure, it's all obama's fault that dadt hasn't been scrapped. nevermind that barney frank has consistently maintained that there will not - and really can not - be any real movement on it until 2010.

but i'm sure barney frank hasn't done anything about dadt because barney frank doesn't want to do anything about dadt.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on