The liberal organization People for the American Way has had just about enough. PFAW says it's time for the White House and Senate leadership to get down to business and bring dozens of Obama nominees--all of whom are waiting as Republicans threaten filibusters--to the Senate floor. Now the group is planning to take that message directly to Democratic leaders, who haven't done all they can to circumvent the obstruction.
"There is unprecedented obstruction going on of executive branch officials," says Marge Baker, Executive Vice President of PFAW.
In 1949, a change to Senate rules allowed members to filibuster executive branch nominees. Senators tend to believe (or at least to say) that, within bounds of decency, the White House deserves to be able to staff the executive branch as it chooses; and in the 60 years since then, the practice has been used sparingly.
Until Barack Obama came to town.
"Between 1949 and 2009 there were 24 nominees on which cloture was forced," Baker said. "In just the first 9 months of the Obama administration, there have been five such votes."
During the George W. Bush administration, Baker notes, there were seven such votes.

"It's...frankly, trying to overturn the results of the last election."
But Democrats have 60 voting members, and, thus, the ability to push these people through (as long as they stay united against GOP filibusters). So what should Harry Reid and Obama do to get results? "They have to stand up, they have to be willing to call the Republicans on what they're doing. File the cloture petitions and force the Republicans to come out and actually show their obstruction," Baker said. "On many of these, they have the votes. It's just a delay game."
PFAW has been particularly incensed by the months-long delay of Dawn Johnsen, who Obama tapped to be head up the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel in February.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Obama1st
October 23, 2009 4:47 PM
This fucking sucks and I hate the Senate who acts like the House of the Lords....
it is time for the French revoltion of .."Off with their heads"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
October 23, 2009 5:21 PM in reply to Obama1st
It's time to rethink the Senate. It seems to have become a dysfunctional institution. It's not just that a minority can completely screw things up, but that a majority thinks that's OK.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
October 24, 2009 5:52 PM in reply to ericf
don't they have enough on their plates? lets get the healthcare reform done first, then deal with these other issues
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
October 23, 2009 5:54 PM
There's a rather large flaw in this argument. The flaw is that they just assume all 60 Democratic votes. It's not so easy. Dawn Johnson, to take your example, probably would have a hard time getting 60 Democratic votes, and if she did there would have to be a lot of horse-trading to get them. These problematic Democratic votes just happen to be many of the same votes they're having a hard time corralling for health care reform.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
October 23, 2009 7:07 PM
They are like little kids. It's incredibly inept.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
John Crandell
October 23, 2009 8:36 PM
On the other hand, there was the report of a comment by an anonymous Justice Department employee back in May that he was up to his eyeballs in frustration with O's micromanaging his department.
Smells like Jimmy Carter. Talks like Bobby Kennedy. However, he's making Lyndon Johnson look like a saint. WHY are Dems so damned afraid of the Pentagon?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
A Giant Slor
October 24, 2009 12:53 AM
Why would Dawn Johnson have trouble getting 60 Democratic votes? Just to vote for cloture? Which Democrats want to block her?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
TheRealFish
October 24, 2009 11:22 AM
So, after reading all the responses so far, I see two trends:
First is the trend of an animal caught in a trap that chews off its own leg to get free. We are animals with opposible thumbs and brains; there is no need to chew off our own feet.
Second, there's an apparent failure to not see the big picture when looking at the graph kindly provided by Brian.
Instead of laying blame at the feet of Democrats for being weak or whatever, maybe it's worth noting that what the graph reveals: This historically under-used method of obstruction began peaking off-the-charts with the rise of the Neoconservative movement. The timeline is an exact match.
You know, the Reagan Revolution, which actually saw its earliest stirrings a decade before but really didn't become cemented as a movement, a silent/bloodless civil war until Nixon?
All the key players found their way to power over that gestation period of the late 60s through the 70s and "flowered" under Reagan with his corporatocracy Voodoo Economics/trickle-down crap: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Podhoretz, Pearle, Wolfowitz, Ailes, Kristol (father and son) and many more who, except the late senior Kristol, are all still think-tanking, plotting and scheming, and ever devising ways to block their opposition (the chart...) while scrabbling to retain power for the corporate overlords.
Yes. I believe there is a lack of cohesiveness on the part of Democrats that is continually exploited by these neocon thugs. Yes. Perhaps Senate rules need to be altered to prevent such obstructionism from barring forward movement.
But blaming those who get trampled under the feet of these anti-democratic (small "d") forces is tantamount to blaming the victim of abuse and de facto taking the side of the abuser. It's taking our eyes off the true enemy here, the enemy that really, really wants this government to be a one-party-rule form of governance, and that single party bows in obeisance to corporate masters.
Instead of beating up on the victims of abuse, it's time to figure out how to open the trap, instead of chewing off our own leg to get out.
Maybe one method is to continue applying pressure against the DINOs, those who are just-maybe a bit too close to the neocon revolutionaries in their corporate obeisance. You know, We the People exerting our pressure and all that. This is the true test of a true democratic republic.
If The People actually rule, we have to exert pressure and exert pressure, relentlessly, until the anti-democratic enemy is defeated.
Those enemies, nationally, are weakened at the moment, though the most virulently anti-government representatives of this enemy, in this revolution, are in the Senate — and a few of them are on the Blue side of the aisle.
Pressure, pressure, pressure. We can not give up or lose...(sorry)... hope... or determination. Because, if we do, they win and this country will continue the death spiral these real enemies started over 30 years ago.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
waywuwei
October 24, 2009 12:42 PM
If the Republican party is the party of "no" then the Democratic Party is the party of "Humm, well, maybe...."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JYoo
October 25, 2009 6:34 PM
Let's rethink the Senate. I agree!
network
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dunvegan
October 25, 2009 8:49 PM
Remove the corporate money nozzle to Senators: Voila, 60 Graysons.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?