TPMDC

TPMDC Sunday Roundup

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Schumer: Dems 'Very Close' To 60 Votes
Appearing on Meet The Press, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said that Democrats are approaching 60 votes for a compromise public option: "The liberals, they like it stronger, but they're willing to live with level playing field, opt-out. The more moderate Democrats, there are some who actually like it. As long as it's a level playing field, they're comfortable with it. There are others who say that, 'I'm not sure I like it, but I won't hold up passage of the bill.' I think we're very close to getting the 60 votes we need to move forward, and my guess is that the public option level playing field with the state opt-out will be in the bill. But Leader Reid will make that decision after he talks to everybody several times.

Abdullah Calls For 'Dramatic Increase' In American Troops In Afghanistan
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Afghan presidential candidate Dr. Abdullah called for a "dramatic increase" in the number of American troops in his country: "If the situation is not reversed from deteriorating further the security situation, so the future of this country will be at risk, and the future of the engagement of the international community will be at risk. So this situation requires a sort of dramatic increase in the number of troops in order to stop -- stop it from further deteriorating and reversing it. The permanent solution is in a road map that Afghanistan stands on its own feet in a few years down the road, troops -- number of troops could be decreased in Afghanistan, finally, and eventually will stand on its own feet."

McCain On Cheney's Afganistan Remarks: 'We Ought To Look Forward'
Appearing on Face The Nation, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) did not condemn former Vice President Cheney for saying President Obama was "dithering" on Afghanistan -- but said instead that we should move forward: "Well, I understand the vice president. I have a great respect for him. But I think we ought to look forward, and that is, to support the president, I intend to, when he makes the decision -- which I believe he will -- to implement McChrystal's strategy agreed to by Petraeus, Mullen. I believe that Secretary Gates is also supportive, or otherwise I don't think any of the defense ministers of NATO would have endorsed the McChrystal strategy just a couple of days ago."

Feingold: 'I Thank God' Obama Is Thinking About Afghanistan -- Unlike Bush And Cheney Did With Iraq
Appearing on Face The Nation, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) gave a direct rebuttal to Cheney: "So let me just say, I think what the vice president said was terrible. The notion that President Obama is dithering? He's doing his job. He's being thoughtful. He is wrestling with, frankly, one of the toughest decisions I've ever seen a president have to make. He is listening to the military leaders. He's listening to experts. He's listening to his own vice president and others. He's trying to get this right. And I don't know if he's going to end up agreeing with me. But I thank God that we've got a president that's thinking about this, instead of getting us into a further mistake, such as President Bush did with Iraq."

Hatch: 'We Ought To Rely' On McChrystal's Recommendation
Appearing on State of the Union, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) called upon President Obama to agree to Gen. Stanley McChrystal's troop request. "We have to worry about corruption but we also have to work with whoever is put in there," said Hatch. "And whoever is put in there, you're going to find some corruption," he added. "The fact of the matter is I think we ought to rely on the hand-picked general, by President Obama, Gen. McChrystal, who said that we've got to have more troops."

McConnell: 'All The Nervousness Is On The Democratic Side'
Appearing on This Week, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said that Congressional Democrats are "nervous" on health care reform:" Well, look, I'm not going to predict the outcome. What I do know is that all the nervousness is on the Democratic side. You saw that last week, and with 13 Democratic defections on this effort, to do this Medicare reimbursement issue without paying for it, by sending the bill to our grandchildren, we know there is nervousness among Democrats over this increasing view that Congress is acting like a teenager with their parents' credit card, not worried about who's going to have to pay the bill."

McCaskill: Bill Will Get Done This Year -- And Affect A 'Fairly Limited Number Of People'
Appearing on This Week, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) predicted that a health bill will get done this year -- but reminded viewers that even then it will be a limited solution: "I think it gets done this year and I think we end up with some kind of opportunity to go to a public not-for-profit option among many private options that people that currently don't have insurance -- and keep in mind, not everybody can even go to this exchange and buy insurance with any kind of subsidy. This is going to be a fairly limited number of people -- 25 million to 30 million are the estimates -- that would even be on this insurance exchange. By and large, most of this country is going to continue to get their health insurance through their employer."

Cornyn: Virginia Gubernatorial Race A Referendum On Obama's Policies
Appearing on Meet The Press, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) claimed that the expected Republican victory in the Virginia gubernatorial race should be seen as a referendum on President Obama's policies -- though he did not say anything about the super-close New Jersey race, which he was also asked about: "Well, I think the Virginia governor's race particularly is going to be referendum on the policies that the American people have seen coming out of Washington these days. While the president remains personally popular, his policies are not. And the more people learn about them, the more they learn about the growing debt--and indeed, the vote we'll have on increasing the debt ceiling I think will bring that into focus--then I think they--we've seen them reject them. And I think that's what will happen in Virginia."

Join the Conversation!

22 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

October 25, 2009 1:14 PM   

Chuck Schumer is the man! It's because of him that I have a Democratic senator!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:20 PM   

Shorter Conryn: New Jersey? Nope, no election in New Jersey. None at all. Stop lying about it, liberal media because there's no election there. Viginia is the only gubentorial election this year and as goes Virginia, so goes America. That's why the South won the War of Northern Aggression.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:26 PM   

Of course all the nervousness is on the Democratic side. Republicans know how they're going to vote already. And because they think it's going to be an advantage, what's to be nervous about? After all, enough press has been spilled in the last month about the surging Republicans, it's hardly surprising that McConnell is buying it.

That whole polling data showing miserable Republican party ID?

Never mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:42 PM   

'I'm not sure I like it, but I won't hold up passage of the bill.'

I don't think you can remain a Democrat, irrespective of your view on the public option, if you don't adhere to this sentiment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:43 PM   

If the senate puts in the PO and believes they have 60 votes, it means Sen. Snowe will be lost forever as a potential Republican vote. Now that's all well and good, but you'd be putting all of the health reform bill in the hands of Lieberman, Nelson, Landrieu. Because what happens if after deciding to go with the opt-out PO, jettisoning Snowe, once on the Senate floor during the cloture vote Lieberman changes his mind to stick it to Obama who blocked Lieberman from his plum gig in the McCain Administration, or Nelson decides that Nebraskans don't want the PO and he needs to represent their interests?

What happens in that not only is the PO lost when the Dems can't get cloture, but all of the reforms are lost and it's back to square one and the Obama Administration has been dealt a HUGE blow.

Do you trust Lieberman, Nelson, Landrieu enough to vote for cloture? Once the Senate Dems decide to go the opt-out PO route there will be no turning back and it will be holding the party line or all is lost.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:52 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

You should be writing bad screenplays for Hollywood, dude.

Get a clue. They still have reconciliation as the fall back.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:56 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Reconciliation is bad politics. I don't even think they'd have 50 votes necessary to go the reconciliation route.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:59 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Your entire post was about the doomsday scenario if they lost Snowe which is total bullshit. Don't try to reframe this to "it's bad politics."

If it's a choice between "bad politics" and "no healthcare bill", bad politics will win in a walk.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:11 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Ah, for the days of strong Senate Majority Leaders. Reid should banish the caucus members who won't vote for cloture to the select committee on acoustics and ventilation for the remainder of the term.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:30 PM    in reply to FreeRider

Or the choice could be just to go with what you have with Sen Snowe. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush...

Going the reconciliation route would result in a worse reform outcome than than going with Snowe (assuming for arguments sake that there would be enough support to go the reconciliation route)...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 3:53 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Snow is not a bird in the hand. She's a mirage. It's like one of those shell games. She's the pea that's not under any of the shells.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 8:42 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

A trigger is no reform. Worse, a mandate with a PO trigger is a windfall for the insurance companies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:04 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Jettisoning Snowe implies she was ever on board to start with. She wasn't. The vote she provided to get the bill out of Finance was completely unneeded. If she had voted no, it was coming out anyway. Believe me, she will never vote with the Democrats in a meaningful vote on this bill. They need to either pin down the whole Democratic caucus and get 60 votes there, or they need to pass what they can via reconciliation and sort it out in the conference with the House. Snowe was never going to vote for this and it's delusional to craft the whole health care bill with the hopes that somehow she will. She won't.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:47 PM   

State opt outs, huh? Visions of things to come: Congress, gutless sneaky wimps that they are, continues to pass legislation that puts UNFUNDED mandates on the states. This new opt out idea will work so well for our bankrupt states. Can't you just see them asking to opt out on Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, public education. What a wonderful new idea. I'm surprised Grover Norquist didn't think it up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:50 PM    in reply to bluebell

Sometimes you manage to surprise me with your outright stupidity and failure to comprehend even the most basic things.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:53 PM    in reply to FreeRider

You never surprise me with your total gullibility.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:01 PM    in reply to bluebell

Yes. I was gullible enough to believe (and hope) that you would leave the Democratic party a year ago like you threatened. But you're still here, ranting "I'm gonna leave if . . ." YAWN.

Get back to us when you understand the basics of governing and civics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 7:17 PM    in reply to FreeRider

With respect, I wonder if we could avoid the name calling and invective on both sides, and calmly discuss the issues. Otherwise, folks, you will find yourselves with exactly two readers of your comments, forever locked in a titanic struggle no one else cares about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:14 PM    in reply to bluebell

States already can opt out of Medicaid. SCHIP is basically a block grant to states that provides federal matching funds, so state governments already can basically opt out anyway.

Certainly, states could propose "opting out of Medicare," but they'd:
(1) Have to explain to their seniors why they're going to take away their health insurance.
(2) Have to explain to insurance companies why they're being forced to cover the preexisting conditions of millions of retirees being dumped onto the exchange.

In other words, it's obvious that you're just being grumpy because you like to be grumpy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:49 PM   

Abdullah is not to be trusted. He's both supremely anti-Taliban and supported from the North, which is Northern Alliance territory and is being backed by Russia and Iran. Calling for more American lives and treasure to be lost fighting his fight against the Taliban, while keeping Russia and Iran happy with America bogged down in the unwinnable war is the exact opposite strategy the US should be taking.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 6:23 PM   

I'm glad Claire McCaskill is giving people the straight dope on this legislation. People are freighting the po with impossibly high expectations. It's real (possible) impact will be as a scaffolding for a more far reaching po as employment and insurance are decoupled over the years (one hopes).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 9:04 PM   

There they go again with that "compromise public option" crap. The public option is a compromise!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular