
It gives a sense of how tough the health care battle is that Democrats could only get 22 of the 28 governors from their own party to sign a letter to Congressional leaders urging they pass a bill this year.
It's a standard letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader Boehner, telling them states "will only achieve the health care security and stability they need if we succeed in working together with the Congress and the President to achieve health care reform."
But missing from the signatures at the bottom are six governors: Mike Beebe (AR), Jay Nixon (MO), Bev Perdue (NC), John Lynch (NH), Dave Freudenthal (WY) and Brad Henry (OK).
The letter, circulated by Reid's office and the Democratic Governors Association late Friday, is by no stretch of the imagination controversial.
"The status quo is no longer an option and we support getting health reform done this year," the letter reads, making no mention of the public option or anything else that might rattle politicians.
A DGA spokeswoman said the letter circulated quickly, so that could explain some of the missing names, but a Senate leadership aide told me Democrats "got as many as we could" but wouldn't comment further.
I've reached out to each governor and will update as they get back to me.
Perdue spokeswoman Chrissy Pearson wouldn't comment directly about the letter, but said her (newly elected) boss has been vocal in North Carolina about her concerns with the health care plan.
"She understands reform is necessary and is very carefully watching what is going on at the federal level," Pearson told me. "She wants to make sure reforms don't place an undue financial burden on the states."
The letter closes with:
"We recognize that health reform is a shared responsibility and everyone, including state governments, needs to partner to reform our broken health care system. We thank you for your leadership in this historic effort and look forward to continuing to work together to get health reform passed this year."
Governors provided a nice boost when President Obama was pushing his stimulus plan this winter. The White House has said support from the states would help during this fight, too.
Last week, as The Hill noted, 14 of the 22 Republican governors signed a letter criticizing the Baucus health care bill which will soon get a vote in the Senate Finance Committee.
Late update: An Freudenthal aide said the Wyoming governor didn't sign the letter because some staffers were out of town and it fell through the cracks.
But Lynch spokesman Colin Manning told me tonight that like Perdue in North Carolina, the New Hampshire governor also is worried about costs.
Manning said Lynch is closely following the debate and considering what costs the Senate Finance Committee bill would leave for the states to shoulder (or what it would save).
"While we agree with much of the sentiment in the letter, we did not sign on because the letter didn't adequately stress the importance of addressing cost issues for states," he said, adding New Hampshire is under financial pressure thanks to the recession and Medicaid costs rising.
"To the extent health reform proposals expand access to Medicaid without covering the additional costs, states like New Hampshire would face significant financial burden - a burden we simply can't absorb," he said. "That is why Governors are urging Congress to ensure that the final bill accounts for additional Medicaid costs, and we remain very hopeful that will happen."
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 5, 2009 5:35 PM
No idea what Purdue's problem was. Based on what she's been like so far, she doesn't seem like the kind of person who'd hav been afraid of teabaggers or scary commercials.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
October 5, 2009 8:31 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
I agree with you about Perdue. She's been hugging Obama close because she knows that she would not be governor if Obama had not been at the top of the ticket.
I saw her yesterday at a fundraiser for the Charlotte mayoral candidate and she was unequivocal about stating the democratic line. So I can't figure out why she balked on signing this letter. She may be in shock after the bruising budget battles and is scared about how much medicaid the state will have to shoulder.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fbacon2
October 5, 2009 5:45 PM
So the South and Red State Westerners? That leaves Lynch in NH as the stand-alone. Not surprising when you think about it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Shrubbit
October 5, 2009 6:14 PM in reply to fbacon2
Not at all surprising.
We really need some serious grassroots efforts targeted to the state of Arkansas. Really, in this day and age there should not exist a state where the constituents vote so consistently against their own self-interest. There has to be a way to combat that...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
October 5, 2009 6:48 PM in reply to Shrubbit
Rolling out infrastructure and services (fiber optics for broadband, newer roads, power grids, etc) would be a way to connect, educate and inform. Good thing for the Republicans that they've been able to suppress these advantages for so long. Antiquity keeps the GOP in power (even when they're a minority).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Archaeopteryx
October 5, 2009 9:28 PM in reply to Shrubbit
We don't really vote against our self-interest. We keep electing Democrats, but they don't act like it once in office. Instead, they vote to take care of the big corporations that donate the big bucks. I live in Mike Ross's distict, but he'll never get my vote again. Likewise for Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ivy22
October 6, 2009 10:15 AM in reply to Shrubbit
Arkansas suffers from being next to Oklahoma, Imhofe's climate change denying state. This dust bowl of ignorance spreads across state lines into Walmart land. These people are held hostage by consistently ignoring facts and reality. They want to protect their freedom to get sick and die quickly.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
October 5, 2009 6:15 PM in reply to fbacon2
No, its not. Lynch is a very good Governor for NH, in that he does very little except work to keep the budget balanced. This is why Shaheen was a good governor for the state, and the same with Al Merrill before her. Since the early 90's, NH ahs had only one governor who forgot this (Craig Bensen), which resulted in him only having one term.
Bottom line: the Governor's mansion in NH is kept and held by not taking a firm stand on anything new or bold until they have no choice and they believe it to piss off as few folks as possible. This comes from the 2-year terms with no term limits NH has for the Governor. Its spineless, yes, but you can be spineless and effective, on occasion
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kansas kitty
October 5, 2009 5:51 PM
Jay Nixon of Missouri's administration has been ensnared in a scandal about concealment of data on high e-coli levels in the Lake of the Ozarks before Memorial Day weekend. A lot of finger pointing going on right now trying to deflect the blame elsewhere. I guess he thought the people contaminated with e-coli at the lake probably didn't need no stinking healthcare anyway.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
oleeb
October 5, 2009 6:05 PM in reply to kansas kitty
Nixon is ismply following the ishy washy lead of that famous Democrat in Name Only: Claire McCaskill.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kansas kitty
October 5, 2009 7:11 PM in reply to oleeb
You got that right!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rich in NJ
October 5, 2009 6:04 PM
Six profiles in courage. Not.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Leftflank
October 5, 2009 6:16 PM
Tie their votes to their own coverage & watch them come around. That goes for all the politicians raising phony concerns while gorging at the government trough.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Pintop
October 5, 2009 6:21 PM
Real profile in courage from Mike Beebe. The last three approval percentages I saw were 63 78 66. He's going to sleep walk to re-election.
I bet once it passes he changes his tune and uses it in his campaign. Plenty of Dems next year will be claiming they were with the President before they were against him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Archaeopteryx
October 5, 2009 9:31 PM in reply to Pintop
Beebe is in Europe on some sort of a trade-mission/junket. If the party threw this thing together in a hurry, they might not have been able to get him in on it. He's been a good enough governor here in Arkansas that he gets my benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
October 5, 2009 7:07 PM
No surprise about Henry.
Here in Oklahoma, Democrat means "Republican," and Republican means "Extremist Fringe Wacko."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GTFOOH
October 5, 2009 8:04 PM in reply to farnsworth
I was surprised about Brad Henry. I thought he was a lot more liberal than that. At least he was when he first got elected. I left Oklahoma, shortly thereafter. Maybe all the Bush years have pushed him right of center.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
farnsworth
October 5, 2009 10:50 PM in reply to GTFOOH
He was liberal when it came to pretending to care about teachers. He was instrumental in getting a substantial raise the first year. Only problem is, surrounding states also gave substantial raises, so he gave up.
Other than that, he is pretty much a Republican. The only way he got elected was a cock-fighting provision on the ballot at the same time. He re-election was more about the inertia of incumbency than policy.
With both houses of the state legislature firmly in Republican control, he couldn't do much of anything anyway.
Long gone are the days of Carl Albert.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stan A
October 5, 2009 8:01 PM
This is why the democrats will not build a lasting majority, or even get anything significant done during this time when (in principle) they control the wheels of government. Too many elected democrats have bought into the idea that their political careers are independent of the party's success or failure. This might be true when the party is in the minority, but like it or not, all democrats (especially those in purple states and districts) will sink or swim with the party. If health care reform succeeds, all democrats will benefit at the polls, even in red and purple states. If reform fails, or (worse) passes but in such a weak form that it doesn't control costs and many people are forced to pay ever increasing premiums or pay penalties, the whole party will suffer. So the "moderates" are playing a losing game, reinforcing the GOP talking points which make meaningful reform less likely, while maintaining the anti-government bias which costs democrats seats across the country. The only winning strategy for democrats is to actually believe in the party's principles, support a popular president's programs and trust that they will make people's lives better, and that they will be rewarded at the polls for their efforts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
October 5, 2009 8:01 PM
I would expect nothing much from Democrats in Wyoming, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Missouri gave us John Ashcroft. North Carolina and New Hampshire seem to be coming into the new world.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
October 5, 2009 8:02 PM
I would expect nothing much from Democrats in Wyoming, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Missouri gave us John Ashcroft. North Carolina and New Hampshire seem to be coming into the new world.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LogicalConsideration
October 5, 2009 9:15 PM
Perdue is a useless governor. She shot down a tax increase she didn't like in the state budget, but she waited until the 11th hour to make her position known, after the legislature thought they had a deal. I'm sorry that's a position you stake out weeks or months before. Plus, it was a stupid place to draw her line in the sand. It was a 2% surcharge on your state income tax. We average about 7% rates here. If you had $100,000 in TAXABLE income, you would normally owe $7,000 in state income tax. This would have been a whopping $140 extra per year. Good grief, but she is horrible. Only think worse would have been her GOP opponent. This latest news wasn't a particular surprise.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
October 6, 2009 12:25 AM
Ok, I haven't read any of the comments, and of course I want every Democrat to support health care reform, but living it a state that's broke, I sympathize with the feds passing the buck (to some extent) and making states pay more when they may not have it to pay.
This should be a FEDERAL and ONLY federal matter. It should not matter what state you live in, or who you work for, or how much you make, every American should have the same, good, health care.
Those who have the money to pay more privately should (and will) be able to spend their money for it, of course.
But means testing means that somebody earning $10 per week more than the cutoff is suddenly on the hook for hundreds of dollar MORE in premiums. Means testing only creates resentment in people above the means test and thus reduces public support.
The rich will ALWAYS pay money to see high-priced private specialists, some of which (many of which?) will be quacks injecting cells from who-knows-what and performing plastic surgery to putt the skin of the face father and farther back towards the skull.
But you and I and the guy down the block could all be worry free about how to pay if we have some kind of funny thing, and that won't be part of the decision on whether to go to doctor.
Single. Payer. Now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
buck
October 6, 2009 1:08 AM
Now that the list of responses has been updated, I see no surprises. Lynch, Perdue and Freudenthal were the puzzlers. Beebe and Henry are in loony-bin country and Nixon is in a state where GOP legislature nixed a bill that would extend health-care coverage by tens of thousands without a single penny of state money spent. So those three are not surprising at all. But NH and NC are not this far down the rabbit hole and WY is sufficiently independent that the gov would not be afraid of the teabaggers.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ivy22
October 6, 2009 10:40 AM in reply to buck
But Cheney lives there...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
carolita
October 6, 2009 3:01 PM
Don't be too quick to discount Mike Beebe of Arkansas. He has been an excellent governor, and done much to correct many of the problems he inherited from Huckabee. I don't know the specific timeline for this letter, but Beebe has been out of the state for quite a bit of the past two months on trade missions -- first to Cuba and now to Europe. It may well be a matter of timing.
And it may be a matter of internal politics. Beebe is far better on most issues, including health care, than either of our Blue Dog senators. But any influence he may be able to exert to change their votes will have to be behind the scenes. Beebe is well-versed in local politics and I am sure that if his choice is between looking good for public consumption and actually getting them to do the right thing (and it could very well be that), he would prefer to influence real votes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Archaeopteryx
October 6, 2009 4:58 PM
Beebe has responded: here.
But, I gotta tell ya', as an Arkie, I appreciate all the love y'all are showering on us. Like you people don't have whackos in your states.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?