
It's been called a "bombshell," but Democrats are saying the America's Health Insurance Plans report has helped unify the party around the health care bill(s). They say it's much easier to fight the big, bad insurance lobby that burned the White House than, for example, a Congressional Budget Office report showing increased costs and insurmountable debt as the American people are wary of skyrocketing deficits.
However, a key Democratic Senate leadership aide told TPMDC that while the report angered Democrats, it is highly unlikely to move any votes for the final bill. Another Democrat agreed the report "should" galvanize the party but doubted Democrats would take full advantage of the report, which left out some key elements in its analysis.
Responding to that news, the DNC's Brad Woodhouse referred to it as the "AHIP Hatchet Job" and warned that anyone using the "phony" report will be subject to one of the party's "Call you out" campaigns.
"This should lay to rest any notion that the AHIP report has any credibility whatsoever or that it should be used by members of Congress in their deliberations over health insurance reform," Woodhouse said.
Organizing for America, the spinoff of the Obama campaign housed at the DNC, hasn't planned any formal pushback yet but is making sure volunteers have the talking points so they can shoot the report down if they are asked while knocking on doors and making calls.
A Democratic operative told TPMDC the report will help politically since insurance companies have such low approval ratings and the American people already mistrust the messenger.
"A slew of independent observers finding flaws in the fundamentals of the study effectively made the case that they would say anything to protect their profits," the Democrat said.
Democratic strategist James Boyce, who is working on a new project to push the public option, blasted the AHIP report as a "scare tactic" that should be a wake-up call to Democrats on the fence about voting for the bill.
"It's a business, and it's not a surprise they are going to do everything they can to prevent health care reform from happening, the same way oil companies are going to do everything they can to block clean energy," Boyce said.
Over at the Senate Finance Committee, where Brian is live-blogging from his prime seat, Sen. Bill Nelson is blasting AHIP for attempting to "cherry-pick" at the "eleventh hour" to protect their profits.
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) said during the committee hearing the report proved the insurance industry "remains right where it's been all along."
The White House writes in a blog today the report is "hard to take seriously" and posts talking points batting it down. Expect Robert Gibbs to have some fun with it today as well.
And even though some cautioned against using the AHIP report as justification for opposition, today it's been popping up all over the place.
The new GOP Web site (which Evan wrote about here) revealed today cites the AHIP report three times to prove the SFC vote will "Burden Americans With Higher Premiums, Taxes & Deficits."
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) also used the report on his Facebook page and Twitter, telling his fans he will ask CBO to evaluate its claims.
"Don't take the insurance industry's word for it; check out what guaranteed issue and community rating, and yes, an individual mandate have done to costs in the various states where they have been tried," he wrote.
Nancy-Ann DeParle, the "czar" who leads the White House Office of Health Care Reform, told ABC News today the report is "ludicrous" and can be compared to flat-earthers.
"That's like saying, 'Most people think the earth is round but if it is flat, here is what it would look like,'" DeParle said.
As Think Progress notes, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) told Don Imus today he doesn't support the Baucus bill, citing increased costs as his reason without fully embracing the AHIP report.
Late update: Rep. Tony Weiner was on Maddow last night blasting AHIP. We have the clip:
Vic Arpeggio
October 13, 2009 12:46 PM
Any fool using AHIP as their justification for opposing reform should be forced to run a gauntlet. And Karen Ignagni looks uncomfortably like Gary Oldman's mutilated Mason Verger in HANNIBAL.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnMcCSF
October 13, 2009 12:52 PM in reply to Vic Arpeggio
The Orly Taitz of HCR
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
October 13, 2009 12:55 PM
Sen. John Cornyn, or some group that supports him, is running the most horrible commercials in Texas about how he is championing seniors in the healthcare debate.
that aside,
what the AHIP report should be bringing to focus is the industry accidentally demonstrating that they can raise premiums without contest from the govt.
They can use the very false reasons they give in this false report. What is to stop them? Are they not saying, make the mandates and penalties stronger or we are raising rates?
Are there price controls in the Baucus Bill? Did I miss those?
The AHIP report may be total crap, but that doesn't mean the insurance companies do not intend to raise their rates, using the demostrably false reasons! What is to stop them!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Murphkowski
October 13, 2009 1:33 PM in reply to Indie Pro
If only the "public" had some sort of "option" to purchase health insurance from someone other than the "insurance companies"!!! Hmmm...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
October 13, 2009 1:36 PM in reply to Murphkowski
something the public could choose as an option you say. Yes. Hmm. Intriguing!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
UTMark
October 13, 2009 2:31 PM in reply to Indie Pro
Hatch is doing the same thing in Utah. I laughed out loud the first time I saw his ads, but now they just make me want to scream. Orrin Hatch, the protector of seniors and Medicare. My gawd.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
October 13, 2009 10:02 PM in reply to UTMark
Pat Roberts (R-Toto) is running those ads in Kansas. I first thought: WTF he just got re-elected last year, why the ads? I figure it's so all these GOPers can claim that they've received "all these calls of support" for themselves, and still keep a straight face!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JimmyBobby
October 13, 2009 1:12 PM
Of course businesses should be able to try to protect their profits, even if they're ill-got, made from lying, cheating and stealing. They should be able to buy billboards, ads in magazines and on television if they want. What they SHOULDN'T be allowed to do is buy elected representatives of the people. But they do. That's what's wrong.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
October 13, 2009 2:26 PM
"Another Democrat" said something? Seriously? That's all we get to tell us why we should give a damn what he or she said?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eztempo
October 13, 2009 2:52 PM
Wow. With even Nelson laying into the AHIP, ya gotta wonder how the "principled" Sen. Kent Conrad can stay comfy opposing his Party and common sense?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jollyroger
October 13, 2009 10:23 PM in reply to eztempo
even Nelson
It would be a coup if this Nelson said it, but it was this other Nelson
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
beezling
October 14, 2009 6:51 PM
The AHIP study erroneously suggests reform will cause health care premiums to rise faster than they would without reform. In fact, CBO confirms reform will actually LOWER premiums.
The AHIP study erroneously suggests taxes on Cadillac plans will increase the cost of employer-based coverage. In fact, economic advisors and even the AHIP study itself suggest the tax will lead to more efficient plans: "we expect employers to respond to this tax by restructuring their benefits to avoid it."
The AHIP study erroneously claims that reductions in Medicare spending will increase costs on families. In fact, trimming waste and fraud from Medicare will lead to more money being spent more efficiently, despite reductions in funding.
The AHIP study is ridiculous, and its release the night before the Senate Finance Committee joke is a hysterical joke. Bring in the clowns.
Alex Brant-Zawadzki
Volunteer
Organizing for America
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
beezling
October 14, 2009 6:51 PM
The AHIP study erroneously suggests reform will cause health care premiums to rise faster than they would without reform. In fact, CBO confirms reform will actually LOWER premiums.
The AHIP study erroneously suggests taxes on Cadillac plans will increase the cost of employer-based coverage. In fact, economic advisors and even the AHIP study itself suggest the tax will lead to more efficient plans: "we expect employers to respond to this tax by restructuring their benefits to avoid it."
The AHIP study erroneously claims that reductions in Medicare spending will increase costs on families. In fact, trimming waste and fraud from Medicare will lead to more money being spent more efficiently, despite reductions in funding.
The AHIP study is ridiculous, and its release the night before the Senate Finance Committee vote is a ridiculous joke. Bring in the clowns.
Alex Brant-Zawadzki
Volunteer
Organizing for America
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?