Sen. Jim Webb (D) knows better than most that what you put on paper can come back to haunt you in Virginia politics. But three years after his past writings were used against him (he says unfairly) in his Senate race, Webb backed the attacks on GOP gubernatorial nominee Bob McDonnell's 1989 master's thesis.
From Webb's interview with The Hill over the weekend:
"They were taking small excerpts from novels and attempting to use them to characterize me," he said of [GOP Sen. George] Allen's campaign, contrasting it with what [Creigh] Deeds has done. "And I think that was totally distinct from what we're talking about with respect to this situation."
In '06, Webb was attacked for magazine articles and passages from his novels critics said showed Webb's misogynistic streak. Their evidence? In one article from 1979, he wrote that women should not be allowed to serve in the military. And his novels (about his experiences serving in the Vietnam War) contained racy sex scenes the GOP splashed across mailings with relish.
Webb says those old writings were mischaracterized. But he says the talk of McDonnell's thesis is spot-on.
Webb, on McDonnell's thesis: What McDonnell wrote was essentially a political manifesto that he wrote two years before running for office. It's directly relevant to what his philosophy is in terms of governance."On '06: "What they did in my situation was basically character assassination. I'm very proud of my literary career."
The McDonnell camp disagrees.
"That's exactly what Democrats are doing to Bob's thesis," said McDonnell spokeswoman Stacey Johnson. "They are taking a few paragraphs out of a 93-page academic exercise totally out of context."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

CT Voter
October 19, 2009 11:20 AM
I agree that there's a difference between novels and a Master's thesis. Or there should be. I would imagine that the thesis represents the arguments that McDonnell developed after analysis, and would, therefore, reflect his political philosophy and would be germane to the political discussion. Unless McDonnell has demonstrated that he no longer subscribes to that philosophy. Not sure that he has.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
October 19, 2009 11:25 AM
I'm glad someone is pointing this out. A thesis represents literally all that you are (or at least have been) for the previous 2 or more years before its completion. You do not put anything that you do not personally believe in in a thesis, because if you didn't, you will almost certainly fail to argue your points properly, and crash and burn in your thesis's oral defense (let alone have your thesis committee tear you to shreds)
Not to mention, who the hell decided that anyone with a degree from Regent should be allowed to managed a McDonalds, let alone run for public office.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
exregis
October 19, 2009 12:43 PM
Bingo.
McDonnell tries to make it appear he was an immature kid when he composed his thesis, and that he has refined his conservative values over the "decades." Well, it was just two decades ago, the bare minimum for decades, and McDonnell was in his mid thirties, not exactly a kid. I'm older than McDonnell, but I'm pretty sure I hold to pretty much the same core values I did twenty or thirty years ago. Most folks in their fifties would not change their core values of two decades earlier unless they were on the road to Damascus.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
_jonny_5_
October 19, 2009 1:26 PM
I like how they call his THESIS an academic "exercise".
Lets put this into context a bit. This man received his Law degree based partially on this "exercise". This was not thought experiment regarding defending the position of a hypothetical client this is something HE (at 31, no less) brought to the table. Keeping this in mind there are two ways to look at it...
1. He felt that these veiwpoints he defended were appropraite and really is the Mysogonist, Homophobe, theocrat he he made himself out to be.
or
2. He felt it was ok to have these viewpoints, so much so that he would even want a Degree from folks who teach this intolerance and accept it as evidence he has the requisite knowledge to attain said degree.
I have no problem with a public official being educated at a religious university. Plenty of politicians have graduated from establishments such as Notre Dame or BYU without advocating this level of bigoted rhetoric. I'd Like to see Deeds pull this out...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
October 19, 2009 1:59 PM in reply to _jonny_5_
I may have gone waaay too far there, but don't go conflating highly regarded institutions with religious affiliations like Notre Dame with purely agenda-driven religious universities like Regent, Bob Jones, or Oral Roberts.
They're not the same thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?