TPMDC

White House Insists Gibbs Didn't Apologize To Fox

Spread the word and support this article by retweeting it!


Fox News Logo, Treasury Department Special Master Ken Feinberg

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

After TPMDC posted Friday about the latest in the Fox News v. White House saga related to an interview with Ken Feinberg, a Fox executive stood firm to say the White House had excluded the network.

Several readers brought a Huffington Post story to our attention this weekend. They have an interview with Fox VP Michael Clemente where he claims White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs apologized for the situation.

I spoke to a Fox media relations aide this morning with another interview request for Clemente or the D.C. bureau chief. The aide referred us to this story in Mediaite, which also features Clemente saying Gibbs apologized. The aide would not make him available for an interview.

I circled back again, and a White House official was adamant that Gibbs did not apologize. The official insists that doesn't make any sense, since Fox got the interview and there would be no need for an apology.

But Fox pushed the issue this morning on Fox News Sunday, with Chris Wallace charging the White House "now says it was an honest mistake."

Wallace interviewed former White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, who said the ongoing battle with Fox seems to be a "coordinated, calculated attack" from the Obama administration. She said it was "unbecoming" behavior for a White House and likened it to Hugo Chavez attacking Venezuela press.

Perino said she was "glad to see the reporters in the room decide to stand up and show solidarity because they could be next."

Late update: We clipped Perino's remarks.

Last week, she offered similar comments about dictators. Here's that clip.

Join the Conversation!

32 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

October 25, 2009 12:22 PM   

I'm so happy to see that Ms. Perino feels so strongly that the Press be treated well.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Gar

user-pic

October 25, 2009 12:30 PM   

It infuriates me that the so-called MSM are being taken in by Fox. None of them have any balls to stand up and call Fox on their bullshit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 12:36 PM    in reply to Gar

Exactly

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 12:42 PM    in reply to Gar

I don't think they were "taken in". They are all part of the same business and that business is making $$$.

It's always heartwarming to see solidarity among major corporations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 3:15 PM    in reply to PorkBelly

The "MSM"? You think the orders came from on high? Nah; TPM already explained it. The working media--the camera people who participate in pools--said FOX had to be included. If you haven't been in that situation, those people see each other and work alongside each other every day; they share coffee in the press room and beer after hours. That's all this is about; the people who actually record the news said, no, you can't exclude FOX just because they didn't explicitly ask to be included.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 4:07 PM    in reply to gjdodger

Major Garrett, the supposed straight newsman at FAUX, was on "reporting" the story, giving the impression to viewers that the higher-ups in the networks came to FAUX's defense and demanded they be there, and that in his experience a network had never be excluded before and never once did he say that FAUX news never asked for the interview, which is the real story.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

October 25, 2009 4:24 PM    in reply to AhTrini1

If they want to become a news network they should at least learn to report their own actions acurately. LOL.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:26 PM    in reply to Gar

That's because Fox is where you try to get hired when your tired of 'news'.
Why piss off a potential employer?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 12:37 PM   

I wonder if Dana Perino thought it was unbecoming behavior for the Bush White House to boycott MSNBC and slander the network the way it did.

And isn't it interesting that Perino is going on Fox"news" to say this. Why doesn't she go on MSNBC to be interviewed and get some real questions with follow-up?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 12:44 PM    in reply to charlie8080

Point taken. But I hardly think the MSM would do any hard follow up questions anyway.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:28 PM    in reply to SporeTen

it's CCM, not MSM...

A more accurate term is: "Corporate Controlled Media."

"Main Stream Media" is a self-aggrandizing term used by the CCM to cloak the true nature of their ownership and a majority of their management.

If it's got webbed feet, quacks and craps through feathers, it ain't a chicken.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 4:12 PM    in reply to SporeTen

Even Chris Matthews drops the ball with follow-up when he likes the person or their politics.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 12:46 PM    in reply to charlie8080

UNfortunately, I rarely see good questions, and almost never see an appropriate follow-up. Not anywhere. What they need to realize is that when they ask a tough question, they will get a rehearsed response. It is only with a challenging follow-up that they can get close to an actual ANSWER. Helen Thomas is about the only one who does this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 12:48 PM   

This is yet another example of Fox creating a narrative: "See, we're mainstream and we're right. Even the 'liberal' media agrees with us and is siding with us against the despicable actions of the White House."

And, guess what? Not only are Fox's supporters eating it up, the "liberal" media is also swallowing it hook, line and sinker. Astounding!

Something's seriously wrong when journalists are defending a "news" organization that shamelessly promotes a political agenda (see "tea parties" & verbatim broadcasts of RNC talking points/oppo research), distorts the truth, and even outright lies. Their defense of Fox implicitly condones Fox's behavior. I guess they're okay with that.

It seems that too many journalists are willing to see their credibility, which Pew has already recently found at a shocking low, sink even further down the tubes.

It's a shame. Objectivity and truth used to be valued among journalists. It seems that that's no longer the case. They have allowed Fox "News" to sully an entire profession, and they don't realize that treating Fox with kid gloves will only further undermine their legitimate efforts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:03 PM   

distraction. that's all this is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:46 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

The way Fox covers the news is a distraction from real news coverage?

Yes, I agree.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 9:39 AM    in reply to Indie Pro

You and I agree on this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:07 PM   

Can't wait to hear Jake Tapper's question at the briefing on Monday. The sheer cluelessness of inside-the-Beltway media is baffling at this point. Is it something in the water in DC? Something that makes them completely credulous?

Whatever it is, it's embarassing. They don't seem to understand that by defending a propaganda machine like Fox, they're weakening everyone in the political media.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 1:51 PM   

I am thrilled that the white house is calling out FOX. I would love to see the other networks out them for what they are: a 24/7 republican propaganda and communication operation.

I also agree with the posters here lamenting the lack of good follow-up and solid initial questions. Did anyone catch the Daily show grilling of CNN? If not, in short, CNN did a segment on whether or not the recent SNL skit about Barack Obama's promises kept was accurate or not. John Stewart went way over the top (nicely done IMHO) pointing out how CNN felt it was important to fact check the SNL skit and then showed all the whoppers they allow people to throw out without a single bit of fact checking, challenging, etc.

MSNBC seems the closest to real journalism.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 9:44 AM    in reply to hooferd

It's the best option we have from the MSM for certain. I would say it's more fair and balanced since we have right winger Joe Scarborough and his cohorts in the morning and wishy washy moderate Chris Matthews in the afternoon and Rachel and Keith progressives in the evening

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:14 PM   

It's the same old group of lying incompoops from the GOP noise machine. You just can't take this group of howling tools seriously. Same old same old.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 2:19 PM   

The part of this story that needs to be covered is that Fox isn't an American company. Yes it operates as an aide to the Republican party, but as part of News Corp. It pushes for things that help a major international conglomerate and it wields enormous political power in the U.S. Hell it's basically the fact that the Republicans have outsourced patriotism to an Aussie.

Really, the harm Fox does to America is in no small part enabled by the fact that it's owner isn't American (he just says he is when he's in the US) and don't give a shit about American security or economics per se. News corp's deep roots and investments in Europe and Asia are never, ever mentioned, even as a branch of the company wages open assault on the Democratic party. Toyota employs Americans, but it the government had made it the official brand of all US cars, there'd be some backlash. News Corp on the other hand, became the official supplier of news to the Bush administration, and nobody says boo.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 3:15 PM    in reply to Bullsmith

Good on ya, mate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 3:51 PM    in reply to Bullsmith

Brilliant. Would a ballsy Rep (calling the likes of Mr Alan Grayson?) now run with this ball, please?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 4:25 PM    in reply to Bullsmith

That's not, actually, factual. Rupert Murdoch is a US citizen. FNC is run by Roger Ailes. This is Ailes' agenda. Murdoch is really just concerned with making money. Ailes is behind the mess that is FNC.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 12:10 AM    in reply to randomname

Mr Murdoch is a US Citizen, true. In name only, I might suggest, having been naturalized in 1985 to satisfy a legal requirement for ownership of US TV stations. Now, as chairman and CEO of News Corp he surely can moderate the activities of Roger Ailes if he wants to, no?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 26, 2009 2:56 PM    in reply to baba2nde

Absolutely and he should. But, will he? I don't know that he cares that much. My feeling has been that as long as ratings are good, then, by all means, keep on doing what Ailes' is doing. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

I'm not trying to defend. I thought I could help out with accuracy in Bullsmith's comment. I think FNC is awful. Actually, I can't think of enough negative words to describe. But, until people stop watching, I don't see changes. Tragic

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 3:41 PM   

Rachel Maddow has submitted a pretty pursuasive take on why Fox is not news, complete with clips of the network sponsoring and/or promoting protests against the government. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#33456104

So, yes, Fox's active promotion of commotion qualifies it as a non-news entity. Call it Fox Ruse.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 4:53 PM   

Perhaps what the White House should do is to get their message across more effectively would be to be even MORE inclusive . . . .grant press credentials and interviews to Comedy Central.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 4:55 PM   

What's really pernicious about Fox is that it is not actually pointed AT Americans, but only at the Congress. They have succeeded in the case of health care reform in selling Republicans in Congress on the notion that reform is "really" unpopular. Ingraham argued that because 'her phone callers' were disturbed by the idea of reform, that means that all the polls are wrong. And Mitch McConnell obviously believes her.

Such dupes of the crooked old Aussie.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 5:10 PM   

Git along little dummies...

Just keep all them FOXnuts glued to their teevees.

That way, when the FEMA Camps are ready, it'll be easier to round 'em up.

.

NOTE to the Glenn Beck's MMFA site monitor: The above is satire (Google it!).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 25, 2009 7:15 PM   

Will someone pleace tell me where in the Qur'an or the Communist Manifesto does it say you have to let Fox into every meeting and interview that the WH gives?
Just party down Mr. President!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on