TPMDC

White House Playing Its Cards on Afghan Policy Review Very Close to the Vest

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!


Gen. Stanley McChrystal, President Barack Obama

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Even close Obama aides say they don't know when the President will be making the decision about whether to accept the McChrystal troop surge recommendation, and are pushing back on reports suggesting it would be late October or early November.

Today's White House meeting with 30 members of Congress is designed to open the floor for questions, a White House aide said. Congressional leaders from both parties will be at the table in the State Dining Room, along with lawmakers who control the Pentagon's purse strings and defense, intelligence and foreign policy on the hill. They range on the ideological spectrum from progressive Reps. David Obey (D-WI) and Nita Lowey (D-NY) to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI).

During the meeting, Obama will say a few words about how he's going about the decision and then listen to the group and address their concerns.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said this afternoon Obama considers it a "Q&A" session and that the president finds it "tremendously important" to get their input on both the policy and the resources needed in Afghanistan.

The White House said the unusually large and bipartisan gathering is part of a broader outreach effort, following National Security Adviser Jim Jones' closed-door meeting last Wednesday with 63 senators.

Obama will huddle with advisers and White House staffers on Afghanistan again tomorrow and Friday, the aide said.

White House officials say Obama is not focusing on antiwar protesters -- neither the more than 60 who were arrested yesterday at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue nor the handful outside the White House gates today -- or on a MoveOn email petition circulating asking him for a clear military exit strategy.

Join the Conversation!

10 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

October 6, 2009 1:58 PM   

I think he'll give McChrystal his troops, but along with it a refocusing on the reason for being there and a laser-focused mission.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 3:03 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

There's been a lot of public gnashing of teeth over this issue, and a portrrayal of McChrystal as being at odds with the President, but I'd like to know what Sarah Chayes is telling him:

Among those who have recently appeared being described as "special advisors" to General McChrystal are Sarah Chayes, the NPR reporter turned Kandahar-based humanitarian. Chayes had been due to appear at a Center for American Progress event this week that was later cancelled.

Perhaps it will be a laser focus on humanitarian issues.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 2:00 PM   

"The Eagle has landed!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 2:11 PM   

And why are we still in Afghanistan? Because McChrystal and McCain bullied us, or because Obama thinks he's got the secret to conquering them that eluded the British and the Russians?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 2:34 PM    in reply to traitorjoe

this kind of thinking makes us look about as reasonable as the tea baggers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 3:53 PM    in reply to sexysadie

Comparing me to a Tea Bagger? Sadie, you must still be looking for the WMDs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 5:42 PM    in reply to traitorjoe

No, seriously you sound as irrational as a tea bagger. Anyone asking to get out of Afghanistan is a fucking idiot. PERIOD.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 4:00 PM    in reply to traitorjoe

Because of Bush's ADHD that caused him to pull resources out of Afghanistan to play "toy soldiers" in Iraq.

Shorter: Because Bush f***ed things up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 2:48 PM   

Personally, I think Obama's going to give the troops with a promise. That if a year to 18 months if the mission hasn't been completed or enough goals haven't been accomplished he'll begin to pull back. That gives the troops every incentive to fight hard, though counterproductively it could give the enemies the ability to fight back.

As of right now though, I think that Obama's genuinely conflicted, because as of right now, so is Sec. Gates. He's the one who Obama listens to the most.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

October 6, 2009 2:53 PM   

A tough one.

I bet it gets tougher as we go down the road.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on