Former Virginia Gov. Doug Wilder (D) says he trusts voters to make the right choice in two weeks, and would be just fine with Bob McDonnell (R) leading Virginia.
"The world won't come to an end, Virginia won't sink into the seas," Wilder told TPMDC in an interview.
Wilder, the Democrat who won't endorse the Democratic candidate for governor Creigh Deeds, referenced the recent polls.
"I seem to be in pretty good company with the majority of voters of Virginia," Wilder said, and wouldn't tell me who he'll be voting for Nov. 3.
Wilder's criticism of Deeds, trailing badly to McDonnell, has mostly been about the Democrat's opposition to his signature "one handgun per month" law that he championed as governor in the 1990s.
Wilder thinks the law led to a decrease in crime over the years and that's why he withheld an endorsement both this year and in the original Deeds vs. McDonnell battle for the 2005 attorney generals race. (McDonnell won by 323 votes.)
But Wilder also doesn't like that Deeds has said tax increases are on the table to fix Virginia's transportation problems.
"I'm very concerned about that," Wilder said.
Wilder said since he rebuffed President Obama's call asking him to back Deeds, he hasn't asked a second time. "He's a man who respects the integrity of my decision," he said.
The former governor who also served as mayor of Richmond until recently, said the election in part is a referendum on the ailing economy.
"The public is not stupid. They know they don't have jobs," he said.
I've known Wilder a long time, and his penchant for drama isn't lost on me. He grins when people remind him that he stood with former Republican governors George Allen and Jim Gilmore in winter 2004 to criticize the tax increase proposed by then-Gov. Mark Warner (which Deeds backed and McDonnell opposed).
In 2005 he basked in the spotlight when he endorsed Tim Kaine (D) for governor, and went along with the candidate on a momentum tour. The same thing happened in 2006 when Wilder (after hemming and hawing) backed Jim Webb (D) for the U.S. Senate. He was on the stump last fall with Obama.
In our interview, I reminded Wilder this would be the first election he's sat out in a long while.
"When I do endorse a candidate, I get out there for them and I stay out there for them," he said.
So, will Wilder be missing the action and change his mind in the next two weeks?
"Saying 'never' is a bad word, but I'm not so inclined to believe that would be the case, and I have not seen that circumstance arise," he said.
And I don't think anyone would argue with my point that he enjoys being in the headlines. I won't fall over from shock if Wilder shows up with Deeds a week before the race and tries to play the hero who saves a sagging campaign. Then again, Wilder likes to back the winning horse, and I have yet to find a Democrat confident Deeds can pull it off.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Barry Champlain
October 20, 2009 12:37 PM
So, because of Wilder's personal animosity and political rivalries, he's okay with having a white christianist from Regent University in the governor's mansion?
Yeah, and the ladies love him! Kick off your shoes and get comfortable, gals...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dswx
October 20, 2009 1:12 PM in reply to Barry Champlain
Exactly. This is all about Wilder's huge ego and personal grudges, the benefit of the state be damned. He became a demagogue when he was elected mayor of Richmond. And he was awful. His opinions do not carry much weight anymore. Especially outside the Richmond area.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
October 20, 2009 1:33 PM
Deeds would do better getting Adrian Fenty to campaign for him in the DC suburbs and around Hampton Roads. Wilder is a grandstanding old cuss whose time has come and gone.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
obamaman
October 20, 2009 1:33 PM
Can someone in Va. tell me where Tim Kaine is in all this? Is he not popular anymore? Isn't he still head of the DNC? I suppose it's easier to let Michael Steele take all the publicity and self-destruct, but I would think Kaine would, as DNC chair, have a pretty strong interest in his own successor being a Democrat.
Why is the endorsement of a bitter old has-been, who puts his petty grievances ahead of equal rights for women, so important to any candidate? After a couple of terms of Repub governors, is that gun law even still on the books? I'm kind of surprised if it is.
I'm also kind of amazed that Va. voters can turn from voting for Obama and so many other Dems to federal office, then turn around and support a Pat Robertson wingnut for governor. I don't know anything about Deeds, but I'd like to know what's so unacceptable about him that would cause such a drastic shift.
I can almost guarantee the wingnut will come out in full force once that Repub is elected, and he'll be using his office to promote all sorts of insanity, with the MSM giving him plenty of airtime. But the world won't come to an end, so whatever.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dswx
October 20, 2009 2:41 PM in reply to obamaman
Yes, Kaine is still here. He is hovering around 50 percent in the ratings game, not bad considering the economy. He has been out there and he has specifically told Deeds he needs to give people a reason to vote for him. As Kaine did when he ran for office. He has been successful raising funds for the DNC: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/dnc-raised-8m-in-september.php Kaine, Webb and Warner have all recently made statements and/or ads for Deeds.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 20, 2009 3:27 PM in reply to obamaman
Kaine is still here, but he is less popular that Mark Warner, and it is Warner that Deeds has chosen to use in his campaign.
I'm also kind of amazed that Va. voters can turn from voting for Obama and so many other Dems to federal office, then turn around and support a Pat Robertson wingnut for governor.
It's not so drastic a change as you might think. Obama, remember, came across as a pretty mild Democrat. And he won Virginia largely on this strength with African-American voters and with voters in Northern Virginia. Neither group is so keen on Deeds, and Republicans definitely have the enthusiasm edge going into this election.
Remember, too, that Jim Webb was greatly helped when George Allen self-destructed, not just with his macaca moment, but with a really bad campaign. Webb also had sufficient support among his fellow Scotch-Irish in the western part of the state to weaken Allen's advantage there. The Warner-Gilmore race in 2008 was, at least in part, a popularity contest between two former governors, and Warner is hands down more popular than Gilmore. He was also greatly helped by the strong Democratic wind that was blowing through the entire country in 2008.
Finally, McDonnell doesn't come across as a "Pat Robertson wingnut." You could well be right that the wingnuttery will come out after the election (this is my great fear), but that's definitely not the image that is coming out in the campaign. Frankly, he comes across with more gravitas than Deeds, who can't seem to follow a train of thought through to the end of a sentence, and looking and sounding like a governor carries a lot of weight with a lot of voters.
But the world won't come to an end, so whatever.
Easy for you to say -- you don't have to live with it! Jim Gilmore almost destroyed the state's economy with his popular "death to the car tax!" campaign -- a tax which is still with us, I will point out -- and I had hoped that voters wouldn't let another Republican anywhere near the governor's mansion for at least another generation, but memories are short, unfortunately.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 20, 2009 1:41 PM
I've known Wilder a long time, and his penchant for drama isn't lost on me.
Thanks for the insights. I'm not knowledgeable about VA politics, and have been wondering (since Wilder's refusal to endorse Deeds) why Wilder is taking this approach.
From CT, Wilder looks like someone who realizes he's no longer instrumental in VA politics and is doing whatever he can to get back into the spotlight. Wonder if these statements of his will have any effect on voters?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 20, 2009 2:43 PM in reply to CT Voter
This is not new for Doug Wilder, not new at all. He revels in being the gadfly. Ever since he was elected governor, he has been the bad boy of Virginia politics; I guess at that point he figured he was in a position to poke a stick in the eye of the Virginia Democratic Party which, to be sure, had not done him all that many favors in the course of his lifetime.
He famously feuded with Chuck Robb, and with Don Beyer, who served as Wilder's Lieutenant Governor, and with Mary Sue Terry, who served her second term as Attorney General under Wilder, and he was bad-mouthing Mark Warner behind the scenes when Warner was running for governor in 2001, despite the fact that Warner had managed Wilder's successful campaign for governor in 1989. (Wilder endorsed Warner in the end, but it was a late endorsement, and not all that enthusiastic.)
So when you say, "Why is Wilder taking this approach?" the answer is simply, "Because he is Doug Wilder, and this is what he does." Virginians know this; how many of them pay attention to his constant feuding with the people closest to him (a characteristic that seriously marred his recent stint as the mayor of Richmond), I don't know. I know he has no influence on me at all, unless it is to incline me to move in whatever is the opposite direction.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
October 20, 2009 3:21 PM in reply to slb
Thanks for the insight. Shorter Doug Wilder: It's all about ME.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 20, 2009 3:29 PM in reply to CT Voter
You got it!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 20, 2009 1:57 PM
So, because of Wilder's personal animosity and political rivalries, he's okay with having a white christianist from Regent University in the governor's mansion?
Yup, that's Doug Wilder. Always willing to knife a fellow Democrat in the back.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 20, 2009 2:46 PM in reply to slb
Ooops, sorry, that was meant as a reply to Barry.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Molecules
October 20, 2009 2:01 PM
live in NoVa and Tim Kaine basically (from my perspective) abdicated the govenorship when he became DNC chair, which is funny because its not like I've seen him doing much for that either. Creigh Deeds has run a horrific campaign which started with him basically saying that he has a transportation plan, but that he wasn't going to tell anyone until after the election. He got lambasted in the Post for that one. McDonnell, on the other hand, says his grand transportation plan includes privatizing the state liquor stores, which is idiotic, but a plan nonetheless. Transportation is the absolute number one issue in this state, and in NoVA in particular. When Deeds refused to take a strong stance on that issue he lost a lot of NoVa momentum and hence the election (baring a macaca momemt from McDonnell). He can't win the state without racking up a ton of votes from this region and he just hasn't given anyone a reason to get excited. This is my perspective anyway as a NoVa democrat.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mateo123
October 20, 2009 2:29 PM
Creigh Deeds has run a horrific campaign. Period. No endorsement is going to save this candidacy. If there is a macaca moment, perhaps he'll squeak out a victory, but as far as I can tell, it looks like McDonnell.
Deeds doesn't give anyone anything to believe in. So, he'll lose.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
October 20, 2009 2:50 PM in reply to Mateo123
Agreed. Deed's campaign has been mostly negative, and you cannot win on a solidly negative campaign. You've got to supplement the negative stuff with a positive reason for people to support you, and Deeds just hasn't made a strong case for himself. That may be in part because he's a relatively conservative Democrat, so he's reluctant to pound too hard on the things that are traditional Democratic strengths.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bamboo
October 20, 2009 5:05 PM
On Wilder: As a Richmonder I know it's the conventional view to see him as a curmudgeon with thin skin and a petty personal approach to politics and no special brief for the Democrats. All of that makes a sense in a limited way. But it's distressing that someone of his ability and achievements is averting attention from the larger issues of fairness, inclusiveness, corporate responsibility, environmental awareness, and competence in government in attending to urgent needs like transportation and education with real solutions and not mere bamboolzement. Wilder knows the GOP in this election does not come down on the right side of these issues, but he doesn't care. He harbors resentments and grievances from the past and can't break out of this victimization mentality. Whether this includes matters of race is a legitimate question, but it doesn't justify his indifference to what matters to a majority of Virginians. An objective look at the McDonnell-Bolling-Cuchinelli ticket should be enough to suspend these personal issues in favor of the public good. Instead, his irrelevance has deepened as he abandons the public good, claiming that it would be no big deal of the GOP returned to the Governor's Mansion. His indifference to these issues leaves him more marginalized than ever.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Redshift
October 20, 2009 6:58 PM
My first thought on reading this headline: "Well, we survived you..."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
twirling fartknocker
October 20, 2009 7:41 PM
I voted for Wilder for Gov many moons ago, and was proud to have. He promised during the campaign he would not run for Pres during his time in the statehouse. Welp, two years in he ran for Pres, managing to fail as a national dem candidate and governor at the same time. I was bummed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?