Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) said this evening she plans to fight Republican plans to slow the process of the cap-and-trade bill through the Senate with "patience."
"We're going to wait for them to come," she said at a press conference. "We're not going to rush this through."
Last week, the Republican members of the Environment and Public Works Committee Boxer chairs said they would boycott a markup of the the cap-and-trade bill scheduled for tomorrow. Led by committee ranking member Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), the GOP contingent on the committee say they need more time to review the law and it's potential economic effects.
Their plans to delay the bill appear to have succeeded. Faced with the GOP plan, Boxer said the Democratic majority on the committee decided to "reach our hand across the aisle" and accommodate some of the GOP concerns.
Boxer will begin the markup as planned Tuesday, but will extend the deadline for amendments until "the close of business" that day, allowing Republicans who have boycotted the process to participate past the original deadline.
In addition, Boxer said she'll pause the markup process tomorrow afternoon and invite an EPA official to come before the committee and answer any and all remaining questions about the cap-and-trade bill Republicans may have.
Boxer characterized the moves as magnanimous, aimed at offering a hand of friendship to Republicans who say they need more time to process the bill. She said the plan was agreed upon among all the Democrats sit on the environmental panel she chairs.
But one of those Democrats who joined her at the podium this evening seemed less interested in mending fences with upset Republicans.
"I'm a little less gracious than Barbara Boxer -- I believe you have to tell it like it is," Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) said of the boycotters. "It's almost like they're school children over there."
Lautenberg said that Republicans were afraid to hold a vote on the bill, which he said would feature them voting against the environmental reforms like carbon emission capping Lautenberg claimed most Americans favor.
"Stop the nonsense, Dr. No's," he said. "This is not going to help our world."
Inhofe's office did not respond to a request for comment, and Republicans on the committee have not said if their plans for tomorrow have changed in light of Boxer's new concessions.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Icon
November 2, 2009 7:17 PM
Inhofe believes global warming is made up. He literally believes it doesn't exist. Don't expect him to come to the table to negotiate on a bill about it.
The fact that he's the ranking GOP on the committee says something about the idiots forming the rest of the GOP delegation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
November 2, 2009 7:44 PM
Oh for pete's sake. If they want to boycott, let them boycott. If they are not going to constructively cooperate and legislate, then run them the f*ck over. Who cares?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
November 2, 2009 9:48 PM in reply to Michael A
The swing voters will care that yet another tax increase is waiting in the wings.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kash79
November 2, 2009 10:06 PM in reply to shooter242
The democratic party has been a willing victim for decades to the tax increase argument. That B/S only suggests the Dems inability and GOP's great success in selling labels. IOW, Dems should try a better strategy to appeal to the swing voters who fall for tax increase B.S, not acting on important legislation is not the answer.
Republicans don't know how to govern, but they certainly better at winning than Dems.
Anyways, even if it is politically risky as you suggest- what is the point of coming to power, if Dems cannot make at least some essential and time-pressing changes? This stupid, 2 yr cycle elections in his country has handicapped the ability to pass any meaningful legislation.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
November 3, 2009 8:05 AM in reply to kash79
The left's problem isn't a two year election cycle, it's that voters are getter smarter, more well informed, and learning how to get heard. That means a more conservative voter base. Not more Republican, more conservative.
The end result of that is the understanding that forcibly taking more from productive people, and giving it to unproductive people, is a no win process. Perhaps you don't comprehend the magnitude of spending already in place? The deficit this year... that is, the credit card tab for 2009, is larger than ALL the individual income tax collected for the ENTIRE country. By a large margin.
And you want more for a fake issue? No thanks, I'd rather keep it myself.
And just to head you off at the predictable reply... Greed isn't wanting to keep more of one's earnings, greed is coveting more of someone elses earnings.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
November 2, 2009 10:07 PM in reply to shooter242
Hope they don't live on the coast, or they will be under water if we don't do anything about global warming. But the repuke way is bury your head in the sand until there is a catastrophic explosion, like the economic meltdown, and then have the dems fix the problem, and then whine and lie and complain about tax increases for the super rich that have no realistic impact on the remaining 98 percent of the country. Keep your head in the sand and keep whining.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AdAbsurdum
November 2, 2009 10:47 PM
When this new TPM reporter refers to the Democratic majority as the "Democrat majority", he unwittingly sounds like a wingnut.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
November 3, 2009 8:08 AM in reply to AdAbsurdum
We like to keep the distinction between party and the process. As shown recently, Democrats and democracy have less and less in common.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
USA30
November 3, 2009 7:48 AM
Waiting until the end of the day doesn't exactly sound like slowing the process down. There is nothing wrong with taking a step back and evaluating legislation for its actual effects, instead of railroading it through and then being displeased with the result. Name calling isn't what we need right now. We need an honest discussion of the impacts of this bill, such as job losses and increased consumer costs on everything from electricity to food, versus benefits. Visit http://tiny.cc/mjDNf to write a letter to your Senators expressing concerns about cap and trade.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Obama1st
November 3, 2009 10:00 AM
I fail to see the benefit of delay for the GOP in getting them to come to the table. They are invited, hearings scheduled and if they fail to show up or boycott, who's to blame? Why have we failed to learn from the games they play and pretend that they are a legitimate political party. Move the fuck on and leave to becl RUSHBO, etc ....If you don't get moving along to accomplish a few important things - beware of 2010!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?