CT Report: Green Party 'Picketing' Ralph Nader In Hopes He'll Run For Senate

The Greens are doing what the do best yet again - that is, electing Republicans.

Nader will peel off 2% that will be enough to give the tight race to the Republicans.

Also I expect this picket is a Nader publicity ploy to get free publicity for an eventual run.

If the Greens wanted a shot at a senate seat, move to Wyoming. 500,000 residents there get two senators all the greenies move there and they`d take over the state.

NOOOOOOO. Will the egomaniacal buffoon please go away. He is the repukes dream candidate to run and give the senate seat to them.

If the Greens want to win why don't they run Nader as a Democrat and knock Dodd off in the primary? There's no way he'd pull a Lieberman and run as a conservadem.

20 or 30 years from now, when the Democratic lemmings who've shunned Nader (and his truly progressive agenda) regret that they kept putting "centrists" in office, they'll realize that Nader was the oracle of progressivism, a prophet in his own time.

Sadly, our country isn't good enough to deserve Ralph.

Nader would be a good alternative to Democrats who are pissed off at Dodd for his connections to Wall Street and Corporate America.

I'm as pissed off at Nader as the next guy, and actually, I thought he aimed too high in 2000, I felt he should run for the Senate or House then. Democratic voters need to kick out some of the old time corporate friendly Dems to send a message to the rest of them.

I'd rather have Nader in the Senate than Dodd, and I can name many more Dems I'd like to see replaced with Nader like candidates.

We have a Democrat as president, a Democratic House, and the much ballyhooed "super-majority" in the Senate (woo-hoo!). And still Congress and the White House are controlled by Wall Street, the Insurance and Pharmaceutical companies, and the military-industrial complex. Democrats abetted Bush in his rush to war and shredding of the Constitution. If anything, Nader has been proven right: Democrats and Republicans, at least in Washington, are all the same.

This is the man who told us that there was "no difference" between Bush and Gore...perhaps the biggest lie ever told in any Presidential campaign. He is as evil and destructive in his own way as are Palin, Limbaugh, Cheney and the rest of the right-wing pack...I wouldn't be surprised if he's in league with them to harm the Democrats.

What we need now is a Green Tea Party.

/sarcasm

Demopubs and Republicrats - both politicians and the people who vote for them - hate America and its freedoms. They are extremist hypocritical unpatriotic cowards. Socialists, Independents like Nader and many others, and Communists have fought against free giveaways for decades to the rich, against unjust laws that take away freedom and property from those who deserve them most - such as animal rights activists, UFO disclosure workers, and the poor. Yet, only Demopubs=Republicrats stay in power. Therefore, absolutely only Demopublicrats and their voters can be blamed for all the hardships forced upon the nation.

Only the very few - the Greens, Socialists, Independents, prisoners - suffer from poverty and financial hardship, because WE didn't create it. The vast majority of americans HATE money, they don't need money, they love throwing it away, because they LOVE giving money to corporate welfare and candidates who refuse to curb runaway CEO salaries for doing nothing but stealing. This is because the vast majority of americans never did a day of hard work in their lives. Instead, they force their POLITICALLY CORRECT religion on others to "support the troops". Well, I don't owe the troops a THING. *I* didn't force them to sign up. THEY owe ME, for all the TRILLIONS of dollars of taxes they steal from us every year. I owe ONLY the NON-Demopublicrat soldiers my freedom and money.

Those who are not mentally capable of computing cause and effect (e.g. such as those who dare blame Ralph Nader for
are absolutely no different than Charles Manson or the 911 soldiers who flew into the Twin Towers. Manson & the hijackers sacrificed their (resp.) freedom and lives for their (stupid) causes, but Demopublicrat voters never sacrifice a thing. Therefore, I feel much more sympathy for Manson & those hijackers, as I do for extreme heroin addicts, than I do for Demopublicrat voters. There is no difference between the brain of a Demopublicrat and that of a crack addict.

Manson doesn't know that moving atoms around in certain configurations with clubs and knives has any effect on anyone. The hijackers don't have scientific peer-reviewed journals that prove that flying airplanes into buildings is illegal or has any harmful effect. They have the RIGHT to believe that, the same way Demopublicrats vote over and over and over and over and over and over and over for Demopublicrats, who give bailouts to the LEAST deserving - the corporations - and who lie and raise and raise and raise and raise taxes and take away freedoms endlessly and do NOTHING to legalize marijuana and personal drug use, in spite of the efforts of NORML and others who have fought for it for DECADES - and then they have pretend to wonder "where did all the money go?".

Well, I can play dumb, too. I have absolutely NO scientific proof whatsoever that anything I say is illegal or offensive.
There is NO such thing as terrorism. That is purely political correct garbage that mentally inferior subhumans make up. There is no difference between a "terrorist" and a soldier and a murderer. The only difference that ever matters or ever will is the individual cause. Some causes justify the use of force - such as to free people from prisons over things that are nobody else's business (abortion, drug use, pornograph) - or to free animals from factory farms and laboratories and circuses.

I have met Ralph Nader in person 3 times. He is an American hero. Mental inferiors obviously do not have the mental capacity (again, because they have had cushy easy stress-free do-nothing jobs and an easy life) to comprehend the ability to push a button on a lever in a voting booth for Ralph Nader's name, or any non-Demopublicrat's candidate. That is VASTLY too great a task for them.

Not ONE Demopublicrat has the ability to ask the question: "What good does honoring the dead do? What PRACTICAL good does honoring dead soldiers do? Yeah - sure, I don't want to see them die - they tell themselves, and it would be NICE if they were alive, but honoring them makes no practical difference to them or the country. Therefore, LOYALTY is a nice quaint idea, but it is totally impractical."

ONLY when Demopublicrats ask THAT question, should they DARE question the value of staying loyal to a political party or candidate - like Ralph Nader - who they believe will lose an election.