TPMDC

Gibbs on Afghanistan: 'We're Not Going To Be There Forever'

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Though President Obama hasn't reached a decision on the size of the troop surge he will send to Afghanistan, he "gets closer and closer every day."

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One it is "probably likely" Obama will host a ninth meeting of his war council after he returns from abroad next Friday.

He said there have been discussions about "benchmarks" for success in Afghanistan but said there would be no announcement before the conclusion of Obama's Asia trip.

"We have been there for eight years. And we're not going to be there forever," Gibbs said. "It's important to fully examine not just how we're going to get folks in but how we're going to get folks out."

A few hours earlier Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned of firings if people leak information about the review.

Gibbs said the meetings so far have been productive.

"What the President wants to ensure is that we take into account and understand - so that the American people can understand - our time commitment, and ensure that we have the strongest partner in the Afghan government," Gibbs said.

"The embassy there is working on agreements with the Afghan government," he added. "I think it's sufficient to say that whether on the civilian side of our effort, whether on the military side of our effort, or the governance side of the Afghans', the President will want - has asked for, and will want - benchmarks to evaluate our progress. That's part of his desire to get a sense of where we are rather than committing to an open-ended conflict."

Join the Conversation!

6 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

November 12, 2009 7:32 PM   

President Obama is really going to have to sell his eventual decision. Will he have a prime time address/presser?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 7:38 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Both, probably.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 8:01 PM    in reply to Dorn76

If I were an advisor, I'd say do the address and hold off on the presser for two or three weeks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 9:27 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Networks won't go for that. They're already pissed that he takes up prime time. Surely the Afghan mission is a worthy reason for the time slot, but I don't think a presser a couple weeks later would sail.

I wouldn't opt for a presser - just a straight address. Pressers tend to ask dumb questions that takes away from the message.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:16 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Once again we will like to ask how close were you to that guy who may of had swine flu.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 2:39 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

I think he will take the questions as well. While the prepared remarks will only allow him to touch on the policy highlights, the Q & A, despite the retarded press corps, will help him to be the "professor-in-chief." I think, he likes the idea of calmly explaining his decisions in detail. He seems very comfortable and confident doing it as well.

But to restore the principle of your argument, I think, he should only call on those reporters who have questions on Afghanistan. Please no more questions on how does it feel to be black now or why don't you play ball with congresswomen. And no more beer summits. It takes too much oxygen out of our juvenile media driven society.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on