TPMDC

Graham: I Understand The Concerns Of Republicans Boycotting Climate Hearing

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

As you may have heard, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee kicked off an amendment process on a climate change bill sponsored by Sens. John Kerry (D-MA) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today over the howls of the committee's Republican minority.

The back story's pretty simple, and not at all surprising. The committee minority, led by Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), don't want a climate change bill to move forward. The most moderate among them--Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH)--isn't pleased that official EPA reports don't paint a sufficiently gloomy picture of a post-cap and trade future and together, the GOP is boycotting committee proceedings at least until such time as they get their hands on such a study.

But then there's Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

Graham doesn't sit on the committee at all, but he surprised everybody when he co-authored an op-ed with Kerry sounding the alarm on the need for climate action. Quickly, the conventional wisdom became that the road to comprehensive legislation goes through him. So what did he think of the GOP gambit?

"I can understand the concerns, I mean one you get this bill dumped on you at 5 o'clock, I mean you really can't make meaningful amendments and...Senator Voinovich can be part of the solution here and his request is not unreasonable. But such is life."

So much for urgency, I guess.

Comments (15) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (2)

November 3, 2009 3:58 PM   

SO once again we have GOP committee members proposing more time needed so the government can spend money to produce a study that meets their pre-set view of CAP-n_TRADE? Isn't that about right.

I just love that we have all of these lovely Americans who call themselves conservative, whether they be public officials or the general public, who are blind to the many ways the GOP Congressmen/women use parliamentary procedure to delay votes (which means more taxpayer dollars are spent on not only the study but the time wasted) or simply to ask for more time.

If the GOP was really serious about this study, which they have not seen and have not commissioned in any way, then why did they not have this study produced by a non-partisan company? Why did they not personally put up the funds to commission this study? They want to delay, they want to request new studies (even though a non-partisan study has already been completed) and yet they claim they are for small government? For fiscal responsibility? The GOP is acting partisan in this effort and has had a number of years to commission a study on Cap-n-Trade, as the idea has been floating around Congress since Clinton. The GOP is against Cap-n-Trade, the GOP is against Global Climate Change and any regulation which would change the current business as usual, the GOP will not spend any amount of time trying to address this issue, just as they have not spent any real time addressing the many other pressing issues facing the American people.

How does the GOP address climate change, by rooting against government intervention (even though the Government by all standards has and continues to address pressing Climate change issues, such as water sanitation and standards, Air quality standards, Transportation and emmission standards and land use standards)? It just amazes me that there we have a two-party system where one party, namely the GOP, basically roots against government (ironically by running for public office) and then goes to Washington and makes government bigger. My life has been over-shadowed by GOP presidents and Congress who do nothing to make government smaller (especially when it comes to our personal liberties, ie. Patriot Act) nor make government fiscally responsible. What a load of dung the Conservatives are, especially those who seek office (I apologize to those conservatives who do as they say and as they do, and I don't think it is fair to lump all conservatives into one category but their is no moderate voice in your party, only the strong and stubborn need apply) but hey they are our load of dung as Americans and unfortunately we are only as strong as our weakest links.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 4:07 PM   

I enjoyed reading that Corker thought we just might have enough information to act by the spring of next year.

He didn't mention any of his areas of concern, didn't mention any problems with the existing studies' methodology, or even offer up any alternative proposals. He just had a feeling we should wait.

Thank you, Senator Boxer, for moving the game along.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 4:22 PM   

meanwhile, while the senate dithers, the snows of kilamanjaro will be gone in 15 years...arctic sea ice will be gone in 20 yrs...and well...we're all going to die horrible deaths because of neanderthals like jim inhoffe.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 4:46 PM    in reply to freaktown

". . .we're all going to die horrible deaths because of neanderthals like jim inhoffe."

who will probably die a comfortable death because of the health care coverage he wants to deny to others.

I'll say this for Republicans; they keep me believing in an afterlife because I have to believe that they pay a price somehow: hell, reincarnation as dung beetles, zombies on planet Zeno - somehow they have to pay.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 5:20 PM    in reply to Powkat

Karma.

I'm convinced of it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 4:33 PM   

Sen. Voinovich is an idiot? What a newsflash. He was completely worthless as a governor, so I guess he's failed upward.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 4:53 PM   

The GOP plan is to drag out and delay every bill put before them to try and get to 2010 in hopes they'll get enough seats to take back the House and or take 4-5 seats in the Senate, and then really have the Obama Administration by the balls.

And if they don't get either, they'll try the same delay tactics for two more years and then try again. All the while the Dems let them play their delay games without calling them out and making their tactics famous.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

November 3, 2009 7:16 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

They're complaining that they haven't had time to read the bill. I might have more sympathy with that sort of claim if Republicans hadn't insisted on rushing very controversial bills through in the middle of the night only a couple of hours after the text was available. And I seem to remember that in some cases, the vote was taken before the full text was available.

More and more it becomes obvious that the GOP does not really believe in democracy. They are not content to let the people's will rule if the will of the people is not in keeping with what the GOP wants.

I believe wholeheartedly that there should be protections against a tyrannical majority, but in this case, we are suffering from the tyranny of the minority. And come to think of it, isn't tyranny of the minority what terrorism is all about, too?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 4:53 PM   

To say this bill getting passed is an uphill climb is an understatement. This will get watered down to the point of ineffectiveness. HOWEVER having cap-in-trade in place will lay the foundation we need for the future.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 5:06 PM    in reply to theone718

Unfortunately, by then it will be too late. Time is running out faster than most people realize. We have 10 years at most to make LARGE reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Even this bill is woefully insufficient. Every year we delay makes the required reductions larger and therefore less likely.

Personally, I consider the likelihood of enacting the necessary changes to be about zero. Invest in air conditioning.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 5:22 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

That's an awfully serious response coming from that avatar. . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 6:33 PM   

How about Congressional Democrats take a page out of the Texas Republican playbook and dispatch the Secret Service to go arrest the committee Republicans and bring them back to work?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

slb

user-pic

November 3, 2009 7:08 PM    in reply to Jaycal

Or dock their pay for the time they refuse to show up to do the committee work that the taxpayers are paying them to do? Isn't that what finally forced the Democrats back to the legislature for the kangaroo redistricting session, that the Republicans were threatening to start fining them for each day they didn't show?

NPR did mention that there was an old rule that Boxer could invoke that would allow the bill to be voted out of committee with a simple majority. The danger, said the reporter doing the story, was that it would stoke political enmity further down the road. Well, I think that's going to happen anyway, so Boxer may as well tell the Republicans to F--- off if that's the way they want to be, and just go ahead and pass the bill.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:06 AM   

Most of the evangelical base of the Republican party doesn't care about the climate - they expect to be raptured at any moment. Why should they care if the planet might be destroyed in 50 years?

By the same token, expecting the various young-earth creationists running around in Congress to have anything resembling a sensible opinion is nonsense; they've already rejected an entire avenue of scientific inquiry, what's more ignorance on top of that pile?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

SHG

user-pic

November 4, 2009 12:47 AM   

Jared Diamond famously wondered what the Easter Islander felt like who cut down the last tree left standing on the island. It seemed like a tough one, but I suppose now all we need to do is ask a Republican Senator.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on