Pretend for a moment that you're Michael Steele. You won the RNC chairmanship earlier this year, and have been at the helm of the GOP for months as it has waged a fierce internal battle over the future of the party. You also have a reputation for being a bit of a buffoon. So the off-year elections roll around, and things go OK. Dede gets Scozzafav'd, but for the most part the media trains its eyes on gubernatorial pick ups in New Jersey and Virginia and declares victory for the GOP.
You might think that's a pretty good outcome. But Steele apparently wanted more credit for the Christie and McDonnell wins. So what's a political chief to do?
According to Politico the answer he arrived at was 'fire my communications director and fill the void with CNN's celebrity GOP talking head Alex Castellanos."
In a way, that's a reasonable idea. Castellanos has no shortage of experience flacking for Republicans, and will surely hit the ground running. But Castellanos' real talent isn't for improving the reputations of laughing stocks like Steele, but rather for sliming their political enemies in campaigns that often go too far. If anything, his new role portends a meaner nastier GOP.
It's been almost 20 years, but Castellanos is perhaps best known for an ad he wrote and produced for Jesse Helms during the 1990 North Carolina Senate race. The spot was called "Hands."
"You needed that job, and you were the best qualified, but they had to give it to a minority, because of a racial quota."
In the years since, Castellanos has worked for leading Republicans, and taken his antics almost as far. In 1996, he produced a similar ad for Phil Gramm's re-election campaign. In 2000, his firm produced the infamous RATS ad, attacking Democrat Al Gore. Watch for it:
Oh, right, and he implied that Hillary Clinton was a "white bitch."
More recently, Castellanos has been engaged in the Republican fight against Obama's agenda, producing segments for the Chamber of Commerce attacking health care reform and climate change legislation, and has done similar work for America's Health Insurance Plans.
And, just to square the circle, as the author of a much-discussed anti-reform memo he's already well accustomed to doing the RNC's bidding in its current brawl with Congressional Democrats and the White House.
Which is all a long way of saying Castellanos isn't a surprising choice for the RNC. But if the idea is to turn Michael Steele into the champion of the modern conservative movement, they may have picked a guy with the wrong skill set.
Late update: CNN will keep Castellanos on board. Democrats are not amused.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Walter Mitty
November 24, 2009 11:45 AM
Both Steele and Castellanos seemingly know no boundaries and are win at all costs politicos. I think they'll win their share of battles, but there is huge potential for epic flame out as well.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
November 24, 2009 11:55 AM
Oh, I disagree. That's the exact set of skills that the modern conservative movement admires most.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
November 24, 2009 12:15 PM in reply to SchrodingersCat
Precisely. Nasty, content-free personal attacks in the service of a looney-tunes ideology. Pitch perfect for the modern-day GOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Scarce
November 24, 2009 12:13 PM
Ok, here's a stupid question probably, but does this mean Castellanos will not be on CNN any longer?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
November 24, 2009 12:15 PM in reply to Scarce
I don't watch, but I believe he hasn't been on since he was busted for shilling for AHIP without telling CNN about his paid connection to them. He was on "vacation" at the time and hasn't been back since.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
November 24, 2009 1:09 PM in reply to Scarce
yes, he will still be on CNN.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
November 24, 2009 1:18 PM in reply to nova voter
I doubt it. That would be a most blatant bias on the part of CNN, having a spokesperson for the RNC comment.
Well, an official spokesperson, that is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
November 24, 2009 2:25 PM in reply to CT Voter
:)
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/cnn-keeps-castellanos-dems-hit-back.php
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FlownOver
November 24, 2009 2:01 PM in reply to nova voter
So what's the diff when CNN has him appear for the express purpose of delivering the party line? Whether he's official or un, he's not there to bring an iota of independent thought to the discussion.
New rule (while Maher's on hiatus): if everyone knows what you're going to say, your blabberings are NOT NEWS and you shouldn't be be put on the air – at least by any news organization with a pretense of objectivity.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
thomas1
November 24, 2009 12:16 PM
buffoons of a feather stick together
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?