TPMDC

Lieberman On Trigger Option: 'I Don't Feel Like Wiggling'

Spread the word and support this article by retweeting it!


Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

In a scrum with reporters just now, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) was asked how strong his commitment to filibustering any health care reform public option really is. Asked if he saw any "wiggle room" on his pledge -- say, a trigger for example -- Lieberman said he'll stand firm.

"I don't feel like wiggling," he said.

Lieberman has stated his disdain for a trigger option before. And today he showed how inflexible on the compromise public option, which would kick in (or be "triggered") only if certain conditions in the private market were not met.

The "wiggle" question was the only one Lieberman took on health care at the scrum, which was mainly focused on the chances of climate change legislation in the Senate.

Comments (58) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 10, 2009 5:12 PM   

Be true to your principles, Traitor Joe!

Your conscience says we can't take a budgetary risk on this, though screw the budget when it comes to the all-important Iraq mega-fiasco!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:19 PM    in reply to Overreach THIS!

Holy Joe has principles? Other than "Joe first!", I mean?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:28 PM    in reply to The Old Grouch

He really is one of the most self-important, self-satisfied horse's asses I have come upon in this life, Mr. Grouch. You can just see him imagining grandly to himself that anyone cares about the actual texts of his deceitful explanations and venal pronouncements.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:13 PM   

At the obvious risk of sounding too polite, no one gives a rat's ass about Joe Lieberman's feelings.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:32 AM    in reply to kash79

Actually, this sunday there is a candlelight vigil at his house. We will silently protest and fill his yard with constituents who disagree with him. http://www.seiu2001.org/action/Interfaith_Vigil_for_Healthcare_Reform_at_Joe_Lieberman_s_House.aspx

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:14 PM   

people are dying for lack of affordable health care and he doesn't want to vote to help them because he doesn't fucking feel like it !? Marie Antoinette had her head chopped off because of an attitude like this. What the fuck is wrong with our representatives?!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:28 PM    in reply to plan69

Another crisis?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:15 PM   

I thought worms like to wiggle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 8:14 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

No. Worms like to wriggle ... like on a fish hook. Sadly but truly, imagining Joe similarly "strung" does not upset me much.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 9:24 AM    in reply to tiowally

That was my first reaction, then I realized that I actually like worms. They are an important part of a garden ecosystem.

I know worms, and have worked with worms. Worms are friends of mine. Traitor Joe is no worm.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EH

user-pic

November 10, 2009 5:19 PM   

nobody ever asks joe about his constituents.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:23 PM    in reply to EH

What would be the point? Joe has made it clear he doesn't give a rat's ass about his constituents. No reason to ask about it.

Signed,

A disgruntled constituent.

-

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:54 PM    in reply to CT Voter

remember it Conn for Joe, not Joe for Conn. This tell you everything

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:41 PM    in reply to thomas1

Bingo. That was telling, indeed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 9:57 PM    in reply to thomas1

It's nothing to do with Conn. His real name is Joe LieConMan. Holy Joe ain't so holy and he has reached the same level of hate I have for Dick Cheney and trust me, that's saying something.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 3:02 AM    in reply to CT Voter

You got that right! He couldn't care less about the folks at home, but it's strange how gross he acts in his stubborn statements on Fox. So unattractive and surprising for a politician to be so giddy about his antidemocratic intentions. When he ran with Gore, I had no idea he was such a creep. But karma is a killer. We should all donate to his opponent and he needs to lose that committee immediately.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:23 PM    in reply to EH

Nobody asks his constituents about Joe

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:24 PM    in reply to EH

Do you mean Cigna and Aetna?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:25 PM   

When I read the headline, I immediately got an image of a dog wiggling--you know, how they wiggle when they're really happy about something?

And now I have images of Lieberman wiggling the same way, and it's not pretty. It's disturbing, in fact. Thanks for the imagery, TPM.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:26 PM    in reply to CT Voter

thanks for sharing it with the rest of us. Eww.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:27 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

Hey, whatever I can do to raise the level of discourse! :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:19 PM    in reply to CT Voter

Yeah, now I have to go wash my brain out with bleach.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:37 PM    in reply to CT Voter

My image was Joe on a hook, being eyed up by one really big-ass bass. Ready to just suck him down.

Kind of takes me to my happy place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 8:57 PM    in reply to Minne sconsin

Sorry. I should have read all the way through the comments before I posted. Great minds ...?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:26 PM   

Wait...he wont take a PO, a triggered PO, a "co-op" version, or any combo thereof? Can someone ask him specifically what kind of reform he envisions, cuz to me it sounds like he wants absolutely nothing the status quo forever....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:06 PM    in reply to jolly ranchero

The kind of reform Joe envisions is essentially subsidies for insurance companies. Not increased coverage, which bites into the bottom line, and heaven forfend that universal, single-payer health care be mentioned.

I will have to admit that he's showing a kind of perverse integrity, in that once he's bought he stays bought.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:27 PM   

Methinks Joementum just wiggled himself out of his committee memberships.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:31 PM   

Sheldon Whitehouse quietly but in a *big way* went after Traitor Joe last night on Keith. He wasn't exactly *asked* but he volunteered that if Lieberman was worried about budget as Lieberman claims, they could sit him and rebut that concern and then he'd half to vote yes, so great, we win. =D http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#33812354

Happens at 6:13 minutes.

And then if Traitor Joe came up with other rationales not to vote yes, "that will have an effect on his credibility, but for now I take him at face value," snarked Whitehouse politely. He's moving to box in Traitor Joe. The latter's committee chair is obviously under threat. What, no fun for Traitor Joe grandstanding over Fort Hood?

In the next segment, Howard Fineman, Howard Fineman says right off the bat that Whitehouse is "very smart" and so is not taking Traitor Joe at face value: "just saying that" i.e. using lawyerly skills to box in the shameful turncoat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:35 PM    in reply to Overreach THIS!

Using facts to try to convince Lieberman?? Good luck with that.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:18 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

Well, it's more pressure than facts. Point is, they'll say, we heard your argument and we're glad you made it. Then they'll lay into him why it won't raise deficit, so they win. And if he goes, "I don't see the public as really crying out for this right now," they pounce. They say, "We heard your reasons and addressed them; and now you're being inconsistent, you have *other* reasons?"

"Are you just basically disloyal, Traitor Joe?" being the implication. They have to decide if they're ready to take away his HS chairmanship; hope they do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:41 PM    in reply to Overreach THIS!

He's already bounced from one illogical reason to the next. It doesn't matter to him if his reasoning makes no sense. He doesn't care. He will not respond to logic. He has only one criterion: what's good for Joe. That's all he responds to. The only way to reach him is to convince him that a vote against this bill is bad for Joe. Make the cost of voting against it higher than the cost of voting for it.

About the only way I see to do that is to put his committee chairmanship on the line, but maybe Reid has something else up his sleeve. There's no way to know because it will most assuredly be done in private. The last thing Reid wants to do is let him assume the role of martyr.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:00 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

Good comments!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:06 PM    in reply to mans_best_friend

I don't know what else Reid could have up his sleeve, but I suppose it could be anything from threat of a smaller office to briber/ethics as to insurance companies, to espionage for Israel.

Say after the Health Care vote they take away the Committee he's so excited about using for insufferable grandstanding. Can they afford him switch sides even then?

I wish Olympia Snowe would come over already!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:36 PM   

Everytime he speaks I get angry at every person, Republican and Democrat, who voted for this guy. Either party HE ISN'T FOR YOU.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:52 PM    in reply to theone718

Republican and Democrats didn't vote for him. the "healthcare" industry based in CT did.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:39 PM   

Joe will feel like wiggling when his backers want him too. Wouldn't it be nice if his constituents made him aware of their feelings, which I suspect are somewhat different from Joe's.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:50 PM   

I didn't know scrum was a word used outside of software development and rugby circles. Taking it mainstream!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 5:53 PM   

Interesting. Joe Must Go.

Seriously, we have to look to some other GOPers and their pet issue to get past filibuster. Lieberman is an advocate for equal rights for gays and lesbians. We need to think of a way to make that issue somehow related to this issue of health care. Or, we need to look to some others. . . . It's tough. he isn't much help, though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:05 PM   

Forget wiggling like a worm. It's time to make him squeal like a pig.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:10 PM    in reply to Moose49

Right on. And what a pitiful mewling it would be. Somehow Deputy Dawg and Droopy and a Swine and a Mountain Cat screech all rolled into one Liebersqueal

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:13 PM    in reply to DickTater

Better Lieberman than Ned Beatty.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:35 PM   

Biggest mistake ever allowing this scumbag back into the Dem caucus. He's as useless as tits on a bull and the fact that he caucuses with the Dems gives his grandstands that much more clout.

This asshole campaigns for McCain and Palin, in the process smearing Obama/Biden and now is in his glory speaking against a Public option he was for not five year ago. He's against it because Democrats are for it. He's pissed off because they chose Lamont, and pissed off because he's be Secretary of State in the McCain Administration and is getting his revenge.

He lives to stick it to the Democratic Party. They should lick him out of their caucus in 2010 and strip his chairmanship. Let his caucus with the minority Republicans for two years and then be voted out in 2012.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:35 PM   

'Lieberman Option': Forward your unpaid medical bills to the good Senator, since he sees no need for a public option.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:48 PM   

Wiggling, while possible without a spine, yet requires sufficient fiber to contract and expand. Joe has atrophied past that point.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:49 PM   

why wiggling when you can slither

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:06 PM    in reply to jsg73

A poisonous snake -- that's him, all right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 6:53 PM   

Reconciliation - don't let one Senator think that he/she is the only one that matters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

CJ

user-pic

November 10, 2009 6:54 PM   

One word: reconciliation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:07 PM    in reply to CJ

Reconciliation, or something -- the only comfort I take is the image of Lieberman matching wits with Obama.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 7:34 PM    in reply to CJ

So simple, yet so true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 8:08 PM   

Lieberman is like the cowardly lion, he will fold like a noodle when push comes to shove.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 10:05 PM   

Wiggle boy wiggle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 10:07 PM   

Reconciliation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 11:12 PM   

He's not a worm, he's a caterpillar. And one day, not too far from now, he'll emerge from his cocoon as a beautiful wingnut moth, to the delight of his fellow limbecks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 10, 2009 11:26 PM   

Of course he doesn't feel like wiggling. Slithering is so much smoother.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 11, 2009 10:15 PM   

Now, do all of you see why he didn't deserve to "win" in 2000? You bitched about the supreme court and they were doing you a favor. Ungrateful bunch of...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 12, 2009 11:32 AM   

Well, it is all about how you feel, Joe! How would you feel if this were true for you? http://cli.gs/23yYaM/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on