TPMDC

Obama Administration: We (Heart) House Health Care Bill

Spread the word and support this article by retweeting it!


Capital Building and President Barack Obama

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The White House just released a lengthy statement supporting the House health care plan.

Statements of administration policy, as they are officially known, sometimes help guide wavering lawmakers on how to vote.

The statement, in full after the jump, says the House bill "meets the President's criteria for health insurance reform."

The Administration strongly supports House passage of H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, a bill that represents a critical milestone in the effort to reform our health care system. H.R. 3962 will provide needed insurance reforms for Americans with insurance, expand coverage for those who do not have insurance, lower costs for families and businesses, and begin to reduce the Nation's deficit. It meets the President's criteria for health insurance reform: it assures that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care that is there when they need it and does so without adding a dime to the deficit.

This legislation is the product of unprecedented cooperation and countless hours of hard work by Members of the House of Representatives who share the President's conviction that the Nation cannot wait another year for health insurance reform. They have forged a strong consensus that represents an historic step forward.

The House legislation includes critical reforms to the insurance industry, so that Americans will no longer have to worry that they will be denied coverage, or that their coverage will be dropped or watered down when they need it most. It covers virtually all Americans and ensures that all Americans with health insurance are protected against high out-of-pocket spending. The Administration is pleased that the bill includes a public health insurance option offered in an exchange. As the President has said throughout this process, a public option that competes with private insurers is one of the best ways to ensure the choice and competition that are so badly needed in today's market.

The House bill also includes important health care delivery system reforms, and would extend the solvency of Medicare's hospital insurance trust fund. Its Medicare and Medicaid policies promote integrated care, quality care, and primary care. It invests in research on the most effective treatments, prevention, and the health care workforce. It also makes critical improvements for Medicare beneficiaries including closing the coverage gap in the Medicare drug benefit known as the donut hole. In addition, it provides new options for long-term care. Moreover, the House bill is fully paid for and will help to reduce the deficit in the long-term.

This bill provides the necessary health reforms that the Administration seeks - affordable, quality care within reach for the tens of millions of Americans who do not have it today, and stability and security for the hundreds of millions who do. The Administration appreciates the hard work of the House on this bill, which contributes to transforming the health care system. The Administration looks forward to continuing to work with the Congress on this legislation and urges quick action on this landmark bill.

Comments (12) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

November 6, 2009 1:39 PM   

Go Obama!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 1:50 PM   

Why the juvenile headline?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 2:23 PM    in reply to Dorn76

TPM has become HuffPo-Light at times

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 2:55 PM    in reply to Dorn76

Co-sign.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 8:13 PM    in reply to geofu54

Yep. Shame.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mcc

user-pic

November 6, 2009 3:14 PM    in reply to Dorn76

I'm more bothered that they couldn't be bothered to properly use the ♥ sign ( unicode 2665 or HTML ♥ )

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 4:09 PM   

Interesting, as most of the rest of the country doesn't

http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/healthplan.php

Oppose - 50.8% Support - 43.9%

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 4:37 PM    in reply to Campesino

You're joking, right? Tell me you're joking... I'm laughing at this drivel you posted, so I'm going to assume you're joking...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 4:30 PM   

You have to ask yourself, how could this NOT be popular?

http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/UploadedFiles/JCTletter110509.pdf

“H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1]

- – - – - – - – - –

“If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…” [page 2]

- – - – - – - – - -


“Criminal penalties

Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:

• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 4:37 PM    in reply to Campesino

Okay, yeah, that's what I thought. You're joking! For a second there, I thought you were nutso!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 6:21 AM   

Only wish the public option were open to...well, the general public. I guess all the unemployed (20%+ by 2010) will have to go on Medicaid. Pity they never gave HR 676 (enhanced Medicare for All, as run by the Canadian provinces) a full hearing.

I have written to my Congressmen urging them to vote for the Kucinich Amendement, which would make it easier for the states to adopt single payer systems. This is how it happened in Canada. One province started the experiment, others followed once its logic and cost savings became apparent. The same could happen here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

November 8, 2009 1:25 PM   

It appears that one of the criteria was making women second class citizens.

The New York Times reported a recent case in which the husband was asked -- since his pregnant wife was comatose from swine flu -- whether they should abort the baby to save her life or let her die while trying to save the baby -- he chose her but didn't have to make the actual call since the baby died anyway. But even to save her life since this would have been a late term abortion, insurance purchased with this health care reform would not have been available to save her life.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on