
As you know, national polls have shown President Obama's approval rating headed below 50% recently, a sign of discontent after his solid win in the 2008 election, and his sky-high approval ratings during his honeymoon period. But how has this worked out on a state by state level?
A look at key swing states suggests that the current political situation has really become a lot like last year -- from one state to another, Obama's approval ratings are pretty close to election results from 2008. Using those election results as a benchmark, it's as clear a sign as any that the honeymoon is truly over -- we're right back to 2008 campaign mode, in terms of average voter opinion.
In all these states, and in the country overall, Obama had a very strong honeymoon period, but that really does seem to have worn off. There may be one difference, though, and it's a crucial one: Obama's own supporters aren't as revved up as they were back then, while the opposition has become very energetic. And that can make all the difference in 2010.
Florida
Obama won the perennial swing state of Florida by a 51%-48% margin over John McCain in 2008. According to Quinnipiac, his approval there is now just as close as the horse race last year. During the honeymoon period he was at 64%-23%, which eventually fell to 58%-35%, 47%-48% in August, and 48%-46% in October.
Iowa
Obama won Iowa by 54%-45% in 2008, a pickup from a 50%-49% George W. Bush win in 2004. A new Des Moines Register poll has his approval rating now at 49%-44%, in line with the national polls. Back in January he was at 68%-12%, down to 64%-29% in April, 53%-41% in September, and now 54%-45%
Ohio
In Ohio, Obama beat McCain by a 52%-47% margin. As of right now, a recent Quinnipiac poll gives Obama a net negative approval rating of 45%-50%. During his initial honeymoon period, he had a 67%-16% rating in February, which became 62%-31% in May, 49%-44% in July, 53%-42% in September, and now the negative 45%-50%.
Missouri
John McCain held on to Missouri by 50%-49%, the first time the state voted for the losing presidential candidate since Democrat Adlai Stevenson in 1956. Public Policy Polling (D) has Obama's approval rating in negative territory, at 43%-52% -- in a state that is having a close race for a key open Senate seat in 2010.
North Carolina
Obama won North Carolina by 50%-49% in 2008 -- the first Democrat to do so since Jimmy Carter in 1976. A recent Public Policy Polling (D) survey shows the state to be just as split now, with a 47%-47% tie on Obama's approval.
Pennsylvania
Despite the McCain campaign's intense efforts in western Pennsylvania, Obama kept the state Democratic by a whopping 55%-44% margin. Recently, though, the Quinnipiac poll shows his approval still in positive territory but blow 50%. It was 63%-22% during the February honeymoon, fell to 56%-37% in July, and as of early October was at 49%-42%.
Virginia -- A Warning?
Measuring opinion in Virginia is a bit tricky -- and reveals a key potential problem for Dems in 2010. Obama won the state in 2008, the first Democrat to do so since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. The most recent survey by Public Policy Polling (D) gives Obama an approval rating of only 41%-52%.
However, this poll is subject to the likely-voter demographics from the 2009 gubernatorial race, in which the Democratic base was unenthusiastic and didn't turn out heavily from Dem candidate Creigh Deeds. Obviously, the 2010 midterms could be very bad for the Democrats if this event repeated itself next year.
We asked PPP communications director Tom Jensen for some guidance on this. "If you re-weighted our final Virginia poll to an electorate that went 52-46 for Obama his approval would be 44% approve, 49% disapprove," said Jensen. "It's still not a perfect comparison though since maybe people who voted for Obama but are unhappy now were more motivated to turn out this year."
Non-Swing States -- The Same (Relative) Picture
The picture in non-swing states shows that the same circumstance generally holds -- that Obama's approval and disapproval numbers are in the same neighborhood as the Obama vs. McCain horse race from last year. For example, Obama is at 62%-24% in New York, which voted for him by 63%-36%. And he's at 39%-57% in Kentucky, which voted for McCain by 58%-41%.
The Bottom Line
For Democrats to do well in 2010, they will need to have a reasonably popular president, with an enthusiastic base that they can rally voters to support. At at the margins, concerns about popularity can have real effects on policy decisions in Congress. Therefore, Obama's ratings on a state-by-state basis are important -- and for now, we seem to be back at the same polarized politics as usual.
Dorn76
November 24, 2009 3:15 PM
Where's my pony?!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mcc
November 24, 2009 3:34 PM in reply to Dorn76
I think what we all must do is sit down and refuse to do anything to improve the situation, until such time as the situation begins improving.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
November 24, 2009 3:38 PM in reply to mcc
But he promised CHANGE. I'm not going to ever contribute a dime to him again. The fact that he's not even on the ballot in 2010 is totally irrelevant. This guy is a total loser!@#!!#$!$!!!!!!!
And if the Dems lose seats in 2010, the fact that that typically happens in a midterm election is even more irrelevant than the fact that Obama is not on the ballot: it's ALL HIS FREAKING FAULT.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
November 24, 2009 4:04 PM
The problem with trying to use approval ratings to forecast electoral success or failure is that elections are never about whether you approve or disapprove, but whether you prefer one candidate over another.
The real question imo is not whether people like Obama or the Democratic party, but whether they like them better than whatever alternative the Republicans are proposing.
Still I am hoping the Democrats get some kind of health care reform bill pass as soon as possible, so they can go into the midterms with SOMETHING under their belts.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eric the red
November 24, 2009 5:34 PM in reply to agio
Indeed. For example, I don't approve of Obama's job so far, but I am surely not going to vote for a Republican.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyMy
November 24, 2009 4:08 PM
I still don't quite see what he's done to infuriate people like CT Voter so much? I guess if you're not willing to concede the presidency to him, it's a given you won't like the moves he's made, and will be influenced by a terrible press and media treatment he has gotten. (See the way the press called his China trip a 'failure' on day one, without a clue as to what he was negotiating with them). At any rate, the Republicans own the media now and they called it from the get-go: "They'll win the votes, but we'll win the message war." CT Voter is proof of this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
November 24, 2009 4:11 PM in reply to MyMy
D'oh. Your snark meter is malfunctioning.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
November 24, 2009 4:12 PM in reply to MyMy
Your snark meter needs an adjustment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
November 24, 2009 4:40 PM in reply to MyMy
Your funk meter is malsnarketing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Problem Is
November 24, 2009 5:17 PM in reply to MyMy
Gee MyMy...
Are you a paid member of the sock puppet corps on Rahm's "Obama Approval Rating Plunge Protection Team" ??
Or perhaps just a kool-aid drinker?
Those of us who are not drinking the Obama-Green Shoots Lime- Kool-Aid like CT Voter see the facts that Mr. Change is a corporate shill and Wall Street front man implementing their policies... which screw CT Voter, me and the rest of the public.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
November 24, 2009 5:22 PM in reply to Problem Is
Dumb as a box of hair, you are! LOL.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lalo35adm
November 24, 2009 4:39 PM
I would have called this "the morning after" instead of although "honeymoon is over" works too.
In both cases, people opened their eyes, took another look at Not-Bush and wondered - so THAT'S the change....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
howie
November 24, 2009 4:53 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
No, the people opened their eyes, looked around, and when back to feeling exactly the way they did a year ago.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lalo35adm
November 24, 2009 5:01 PM in reply to howie
LOL. That's what happens when you spend a year with your eyes closed.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Problem Is
November 24, 2009 5:03 PM
Yeah well Mr. Change, you screw the American public time and time again implementing Wall Street's orders...
1. Unemployment sky rockets... tried to lie your way out of that one.
2. Green shoots are all manipulations... tried to lie your way out of that one.
3. Devaluing the dollar and ripping off tax payers for Wall Street welfare... still trying to lie your way out of that one.
4. Rigged financial markets, Fed dollar pumping and HFT by your owners... still trying to lie your way out of that one.
I hear your pain, Mr. Change. But what's a bunch of worthless, bought off corporate Democrats to do? Eat shit like McAuliffe?
Well Mr. Change, you take your orders from your owners on Wall Street and screw the American public every chance you get...
You will be less popular with the people... but mighty popular with the finance and corporate owners whose campaign bribes you so covet.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
November 24, 2009 5:15 PM
You want to raise those numbers? DO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S WORK. PERIOD
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bill
November 24, 2009 6:32 PM
This administration lives in a 'bipartisanship' fantasy. The Republicans are a 'take no prisoners' party and every move toward them is seen a capitulation and weakness, emboldening them more.
This administration has lost most of the people who put it there and is losing others on a daily basis. It is no surprise the Republicans can fight and win.
For the administration is living a fantasy. The administration does not have the fighting spirit required for the effort. It is a sad and pathetic ending to a very, very short period of 'change you can believe in'.
I feel sorry for Obama (who has apparently surrounded himself with delusional folks who think they know whta they're doing but most certainly do not. But most, I feel sorry for the American people, who have now been fooled by two consecutive administrations - one for a needless and wasteful war followed by ineptitude and another for an extravagant and ill-timed 'bail out' followed by lackluster leadership on traditional Democratic issues.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Zeus
November 24, 2009 7:59 PM in reply to bill
Unfortunately well put. The Republicans will take out the entire world just to prove their point and will destroy the country and Obama to his face to take down the Democratic Party and to win their power back. You are either pro-suicide, pro-enablement, pro-bipartisanship, or you are for this country and its people. Use every lever and principle and never let up.
Alternately, some suggest Obama's patience will pay off with the opposition spending its wallet and energy in opposition before tiring. But hatred, especially emboldened hatred, only seems to get the Teabaggers more pumped and our side more dispirited as we sit here getting punched silly and our representatives keep trying to make nice and date the opponents of honest, effective government, i.e. any kind of government that might actually benefit the general public.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Zeus
November 24, 2009 8:00 PM in reply to bill
Unfortunately well put. The Republicans will take out the entire world just to prove their point and will destroy the country and Obama to his face to take down the Democratic Party and to win their power back. You are either pro-suicide, pro-enablement, pro-bipartisanship, or you are for this country and its people. Use every lever and principle and never let up.
Alternately, some suggest Obama's patience will pay off with the opposition spending its wallet and energy in opposition before tiring. But hatred, especially emboldened hatred, only seems to get the Teabaggers more pumped and our side more dispirited as we sit here getting punched silly and our representatives keep trying to make nice and date the opponents of honest, effective government, i.e. any kind of government that might actually benefit the general public.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
agio
November 25, 2009 10:17 AM in reply to bill
Just curious, bill, if you have such an iron clad understanding of American politics what are you doing commenting on a blog instead of running the show yourself?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?