
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she's feeling positive that a controversial abortion amendment found in the House-passed health care bill won't derail reform if and when a bill leaves the Senate.
"I'm optimistic we'll find common ground," she told reporters this morning. "This is not a bill about abortion, this is a bill about health care."
The Senate reform package which made its debut last night doesn't contain the Stupak Amendment language found in the House bill. In her first public comments on the controversy the amendment has created among members of her caucus on both sides of the abortion debate, Pelosi said she sides with pro-choice advocates who say the language in Stupak goes too far.
"Stupak goes beyond maintaining the status quo" on abortion funding, Pelosi said.
Pelosi praised the new Senate bill, which she said has "a great deal in common" with the bill the House passed. She said she expects the bills can be blended in a conference -- and that abortion won't stand in the way of that. She said that House Democrats are in agreement that a final bill will be "abortion-neutral," meaning that it will not make new policy on the practice either way.
"I trust that we will have a resolution of all this," she said, referring to the abortion debate.
ericf
November 19, 2009 12:07 PM
We need to change the status quo. Especially the part where Stupak and Pitts are incumbent representatives. Please someone from Michigan, tell us Stupak has a primary challenger.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Frog Leg
November 19, 2009 12:26 PM in reply to ericf
Stupak represents the most conservative and rural part of Michigan. A victory by a liberal primary challenger hands the seat off to a hard core Republican.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VictorLH
November 19, 2009 3:46 PM in reply to Frog Leg
So what, there wouldn't be much of a difference.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Parallax857
November 19, 2009 4:54 PM in reply to VictorLH
In certain districts it makes sense to have conservadems. In others, it does not. There's no excuse for a Joe Lieberman in Connecticut. The party fell down badly in not fighting for Lamont. But it makes no sense to drive Stupak out of the party. That's the strategy of the tea baggers (e.g. NY-23).
That said, I think it makes no sense for conservadems to run as Repulbican-lite. They too should stand up for the good things our party does for ordinary people. That's how we begin to win the war of ideas. When conservadems run from those policies, they endanger their own re-election. If they want to oppose gun control or abortion, that's fine so long as they don't derail legislation that's important to the party as a while -- such as health care reform. That's where Stupak was out of line, and I do think he should pay a price for it. I hope Pelosi makes sure he does.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?