The new Quinnipiac poll in Connecticut has an interesting result regarding Sen. Joe Lieberman: More voters see his policies as being close to the Republicans than close to the Democrats.
An outright majority 51% of Connecticut voters, say Lieberman's views are closer to the Republican Party, with only 25% saying his views are closer to the Democrats. It's an amazing journey that Lieberman has taken, from being the 2000 Dem nominee for Vice President, to losing his primary and being re-elected as an independent in 2006, and supporting the Republican nominee for president in 2008 and then continuing as a member of the Democratic caucus.
Lieberman's overall approval rating is 49%, with 44% disapproval. Among Republicans, his approval is 74%-20%, with Democrats against him by 31%-62%, and independents approving by 52%-40%.
The public is split on Lieberman's re-election in 2012, with 46% saying he deserves another term and 45% saying he does not. If he runs as a re-election, 20% say he should do so as a Republican, only 12% say he should be a Democrat, and 55% say he should continue as an independent. The margin of error is ±2.8%.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Andreams
November 12, 2009 10:48 AM
I agree with Ct voters - he's definitely more a repus. I'm surprised at his approval numbers - wish they were in the tank.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnmccsf
November 12, 2009 10:58 AM in reply to Andreams
Better than I'd thought as well.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Barry Champlain
November 12, 2009 2:16 PM in reply to johnmccsf
Bear in mind that not one dime has yet been spent in his home state, to drive up his negatives.
Also, there's the usual question as to exactly how gloves-off the Democratic Party will be willing to get, in attacking him, even if he jumps to the Republican Party. Another campaign against him will probably be, as it always turns out, a polite and deferential objection to some of the votes of this honorable member of the Old Boy's Club.
One good nuclear campaign against him, and he'd be toast.
Therefore, expect him to be re-elected. There are certain things that are just not done, to honorable statesmen like Joe Lieberman.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mimi katz
November 12, 2009 10:57 AM
Not so surprising. He won the Senate seat against Republican liberal Lowell Weicker by running to Weicker's right. He's always been a conservative who took some liberal positions to get elected.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
November 12, 2009 11:10 AM
And I thought he was more Dominionist than Rethuglican. Oh, wait, they're interchangeable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ben_nelsons_hair
November 12, 2009 11:11 AM
The problem for Holy Joe is that it will be a Presidential election year which means dems will be out in full force. Unlike last time where Joe could count on a good chunk of dems, indies, and repubs to keep him in power, that will not be the case next time.
There are just not enough repubs for him to win.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Moose49
November 12, 2009 11:31 AM
Connecticut voters are simply stating the obvious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
decisivemoment
November 12, 2009 12:07 PM
He can still get re-elected, unfortunately. He sweeps up the Republican vote, and dangles just enough carrots in front of his long-time labor union backers to get over the top. People who want him out will have to be at the top of their game, organizationally and financially. Convincing the unions that he's not in their interest is going to be crucial.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
o224hsday
November 12, 2009 12:15 PM
Frankly, I'm wondering why 30% of DEMs would still support him. That is about what he had during the General Election in '06. I thought his numbers in that group would have dropped more. Perhaps, like GWB's 30% ish number, there are some who support him no matter what.
Hartford Courant Opinion piece by George Jepson, former DEM State Chr.
Whatever Lieberman Is, It Isn't Loyal
...Sen. Lieberman's behavior makes sense only in the context of 2012 re-election politics. He has burned too many bridges to run as a Democrat. To switch and run as a Republican, while possible, is tricky. True Republican conservatives would object and create roadblocks to a Lieberman nomination. He would also diminish his chance of building a strong bipartisan vote. The more likely route is to run again as an independent and retain more control of the process.
Either way, the goal is to recreate Sen. Lieberman's 2006 coalition in the general election, when he won 50 percent against Lamont's 40 percent by gathering roughly 35 percent of the Democrats, 55 percent of independents and 66 percent of Republicans.
It won't be easy, as he has lost ground with Democrats and independents, the two largest voting blocs. The key first step is to rebuild his ties to Republican voters and to reinvigorate his image as someone above partisan politics. Both of these he accomplishes by campaigning for Republicans and by supporting the GOP health care filibuster. Look to him to tack right during the next several years on other issues as well, and to have high-profile collaborations with Republican senators. (For example, expect nuclear power, long a Republican priority, to figure prominently in Lieberman's climate change legislation.) If the image buffing works, and, if the Republicans nominate Lieberman or field a weak candidate as they did in 2006, he could be back within striking distance.
http://tinyurl.com/ybu2vre
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?