A new Rasmussen poll of Minnesota, where Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty is widely seen as a potential presidential candidate, finds that a plurality of likely voters in the state would not vote for him.
Respondents were asked: "Suppose Governor Tim Pawlenty runs for President in 2012 and wins the Republican nomination. If Pawlenty was the Republican Presidential candidate, would you vote for him?"
The numbers: Yes 42%, No 46%, with a ±3% margin of error. The poll also has Pawlenty's approval rating as governor at 52%, with 47% disapproval.
Minnesota has not voted Republican for president since the 1972 Nixon landslide. In 2008, it voted for Barack Obama by a 54%-44% margin.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

The Old Grouch
November 13, 2009 10:37 AM
This Minnesotan would vote for Ralph Wiggum first.
He's now trying to engineer a state constitutional amendment tying spending to revenue - after, of course, his upper-crust tax cuts. Since he's standing down after this term, what he's after is tying the hands of the state government while walking away from the consequences. In his sick, twisted mind, that somehow equates to "responsibility" in governance.
Maybe we ought to ask Californians how well things like that work. Last I heard, the world's sixth largest economy was in...interesting shape.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hussein Stemper
November 13, 2009 11:01 AM in reply to The Old Grouch
As a fellow citizen of flyover state -- co-sign.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Soldier
November 13, 2009 1:39 PM in reply to The Old Grouch
Sitting in the Golden State, I can tell you we're still suffering from St. Ronnnie's decisions in the 70s.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
November 13, 2009 12:24 PM
Neither would 75% of the rest of the states. Hang it up timmy. Your 15 minutes of "fame", the one passed up for Rambo of the great northwest for vp, are soooo over.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
neesy08
November 13, 2009 12:37 PM
but they vote for michele bachmann. go figure
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
REFG
November 13, 2009 12:40 PM in reply to neesy08
No, one district of of eight voted for her.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hussein Stemper
November 13, 2009 2:26 PM in reply to neesy08
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joe Bob
November 13, 2009 12:38 PM
A majority of Minnesotans have never even voted for Pawlenty as Governor. IIRC, he won pluralities in 2006 with a little under 47% and in 2002 under 45%.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
exregis
November 13, 2009 12:48 PM
There goes the (Virgil) Goode and (Tim) Pawlenty ticket. Sigh.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
benny 4 facts
November 13, 2009 1:04 PM
For some reason I put no faith in Rasmussen polling. I use it to see how the right is trying to setup the political playing field.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minnesotan
November 13, 2009 1:37 PM
Rasmussen usually has numbers that favor Republicans, so for it to still show Pawlenty losing says a lot about how Minnesotans don't like him. He only won because he had the benefit of liberal third-party candidates siphoning off votes in 2002 and 2006. Yet, I still wouldn't be surprised of Pawlenty got the nod. Republicans have been obsessed with winning Minnesota (Rove himself said it was one of his goals) and they've spent milliions there since 2002 only to lose both Senate elections, a House seat, control of the State Legislature and (most likely) the governorship come 2010. I say let them keep at it if they want - Minnesotans are proud to be from the only state that never voted for Reagan!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mmanion
November 13, 2009 1:55 PM
But T-Paw is so precious when he gets all righteously angry and fight-y and stuff, like he did in Iowa recently. His sadly comical efforts to be accepted by tea bagging brethren are a little bit cringe-inducing, akin to watching a nerd in high school trying to get accepted by the mean-spirited jocks. He truly doesn't get that they are laughing AT him and not WITH him. To borrow an analogy from Matt Taibbi, watching him try to hold his own with the lunatic fringe is a little like watching Mr. Rogers address the Reichstag.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minnesota Raindog
November 13, 2009 10:15 PM
Neither Tim Pawlenty nor Michele Bachmann have received a majority of the votes for the offices they currently hold. Pawlenty just announced that the state will likely have to borrow money in January to balance the multibillion-dollar budget deficit he's leaving us with. Pawlenty is being sued by citizens who charge his unilateral budget cuts he made this year to balance the budget were unconstitutional. Hell, Pawlenty even ran away from the deer he wounded on the deer season opener, leaving his hunting party to track it (unsuccessfully) in the woods while he took off for a political fundraiser in Iowa. A perfect analogy to the way he's governed this state. Is it any wonder Minnesotans--who know him and his misdeeds the best-- wouldn't vote for him for president?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?