TPMDC

Poll: Minnesota Would Not Vote For Pawlenty For President

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN)

Read More

Pres '12, Tim Pawlenty

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

A new Rasmussen poll of Minnesota, where Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty is widely seen as a potential presidential candidate, finds that a plurality of likely voters in the state would not vote for him.

Respondents were asked: "Suppose Governor Tim Pawlenty runs for President in 2012 and wins the Republican nomination. If Pawlenty was the Republican Presidential candidate, would you vote for him?"

The numbers: Yes 42%, No 46%, with a ±3% margin of error. The poll also has Pawlenty's approval rating as governor at 52%, with 47% disapproval.

Minnesota has not voted Republican for president since the 1972 Nixon landslide. In 2008, it voted for Barack Obama by a 54%-44% margin.

Join the Conversation!

13 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 13, 2009 10:37 AM   

This Minnesotan would vote for Ralph Wiggum first.

He's now trying to engineer a state constitutional amendment tying spending to revenue - after, of course, his upper-crust tax cuts. Since he's standing down after this term, what he's after is tying the hands of the state government while walking away from the consequences. In his sick, twisted mind, that somehow equates to "responsibility" in governance.

Maybe we ought to ask Californians how well things like that work. Last I heard, the world's sixth largest economy was in...interesting shape.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 11:01 AM    in reply to The Old Grouch

As a fellow citizen of flyover state -- co-sign.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:39 PM    in reply to The Old Grouch

Sitting in the Golden State, I can tell you we're still suffering from St. Ronnnie's decisions in the 70s.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:24 PM   

Neither would 75% of the rest of the states. Hang it up timmy. Your 15 minutes of "fame", the one passed up for Rambo of the great northwest for vp, are soooo over.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:37 PM   

but they vote for michele bachmann. go figure

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:40 PM    in reply to neesy08

No, one district of of eight voted for her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 2:26 PM    in reply to neesy08

Rasmussen also asked about the performance of Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., whose national profile has been sky-high in recent months, giving her exposure far beyond her Sixth Congressional District.

Fifty-one percent of likely voters said they approve of Bachmann's performance, while 45 percent do not. A third said they strongly disapprove of the job she's doing, while 28 percent strongly approve.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/69978342.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUT

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:38 PM   

A majority of Minnesotans have never even voted for Pawlenty as Governor. IIRC, he won pluralities in 2006 with a little under 47% and in 2002 under 45%.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 12:48 PM   

There goes the (Virgil) Goode and (Tim) Pawlenty ticket. Sigh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:04 PM   

For some reason I put no faith in Rasmussen polling. I use it to see how the right is trying to setup the political playing field.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:37 PM   

Rasmussen usually has numbers that favor Republicans, so for it to still show Pawlenty losing says a lot about how Minnesotans don't like him. He only won because he had the benefit of liberal third-party candidates siphoning off votes in 2002 and 2006. Yet, I still wouldn't be surprised of Pawlenty got the nod. Republicans have been obsessed with winning Minnesota (Rove himself said it was one of his goals) and they've spent milliions there since 2002 only to lose both Senate elections, a House seat, control of the State Legislature and (most likely) the governorship come 2010. I say let them keep at it if they want - Minnesotans are proud to be from the only state that never voted for Reagan!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 1:55 PM   

But T-Paw is so precious when he gets all righteously angry and fight-y and stuff, like he did in Iowa recently. His sadly comical efforts to be accepted by tea bagging brethren are a little bit cringe-inducing, akin to watching a nerd in high school trying to get accepted by the mean-spirited jocks. He truly doesn't get that they are laughing AT him and not WITH him. To borrow an analogy from Matt Taibbi, watching him try to hold his own with the lunatic fringe is a little like watching Mr. Rogers address the Reichstag.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 13, 2009 10:15 PM   

Neither Tim Pawlenty nor Michele Bachmann have received a majority of the votes for the offices they currently hold. Pawlenty just announced that the state will likely have to borrow money in January to balance the multibillion-dollar budget deficit he's leaving us with. Pawlenty is being sued by citizens who charge his unilateral budget cuts he made this year to balance the budget were unconstitutional. Hell, Pawlenty even ran away from the deer he wounded on the deer season opener, leaving his hunting party to track it (unsuccessfully) in the woods while he took off for a political fundraiser in Iowa. A perfect analogy to the way he's governed this state. Is it any wonder Minnesotans--who know him and his misdeeds the best-- wouldn't vote for him for president?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on