Poll: Public Opposes Afghanistan Surge, Split On Obama's Decision-Making
A new CNN poll finds that only 40% of Americans favor the war in Afghanistan, with 58% opposing it. American also do not support sending more troops to Afghanistan, by a 42%-56% margin. The public is split on President Obama's decision-making process with 49% saying he is taking too long, and 50% who disagree.
Obama's Day Ahead
President Obama and the First Lady will host a Veterans Day breakfast, at 9:05 a.m. ET in the White House. At 11 a.m. ET, he will participate in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknowns, and will deliver remarks at 11:25 a.m. ET. He will meet at 2:30 p.m. ET with his national security team on Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Biden's Day Ahead
Vice President Biden and Dr. Jill Biden will join the President and First Lady at today's Veterans Day events. At 12 p.m. ET, the Bidens will host a luncheon at the Naval Observatory, for veterans and active duty service-members and their families. In the afternoon, Biden will participate in the President's meeting with his national security team on Afghanistan and Pakistan. In the evening, Biden will attend The Lab School of Washington's 25th Annual Gala.
NYT: Gates, Hillary, Mullen Favor Sending More Troops To Afghanistan
The New York Times reports that three top Obama advisers favor sending 30,000 or more additional troops to Afghanistan: Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Adm. Mike Mullen. However, even here there is not unanimity: "Officials said that while Admiral Mullen and Mrs. Clinton were generally in sync with Mr. Gates in supporting an option of about 30,000 troops, there were variations in their positions and they were not working in lock step."
Hillary Clinton Urges Elections In Myanmar
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has urged Myanmar to plan for elections in 2010: "We're seeking ... a process inside Burma that would inspire a dialogue among all of the stakeholders so that there could be a growing consensus within Burma itself about the way forward."
Senate Won't Be In Session For Thanksgiving Week
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will not keep the Senate open during the week of Thanksgiving, but work on the health care bill could continue into the weekend of November 21. "Harry's made a pretty serious promise to the Members that we won't be here Thanksgiving week," said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL).
CQ: Term Limits Not A Big Issue -- It Pays To Overstay
Amidst a new push from conservatives for Congressional term limits, CQ notes that the issue has not been a big draw among voters. As key evidence, members of Congress who make term-limit pledges often end up breaking them -- of the 73 lawmakers who made personal term-limit pledges in 1994, 68 ended up breaking them.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

theone718
November 11, 2009 9:32 AM
I think we should join The Conservatives to instill term limits. When EITHER side has lifelong polititians some are outstanding and do so much (Ted Kennedy of course) but TOO many being beholden by Washington and neglect their constituents. Either term limits or 4 years for Senators instead of 6. Either way we should do this WITH them
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Old Grouch
November 11, 2009 9:48 AM in reply to theone718
Term limits are a terrible idea on multiple levels. Your "Ted Kennedy" exception is only the first - the enforced (and often counterproductive) gutting of the institutional memory - and in Kennedy's case, often, conscience.
Term limits are also profoundly antidemocracy. By telling a state's voters they cannot vote for someone, we effectively disenfranchise voters who would make that choice.
And "rookie" Senators and Representatives, without that institutional memory, are far more susceptible to the pressures and blandishments of both lobbyists and staff, who will know far better how the inside mechanisms work.
Ever notice how those advocating for term limits are usually those who lost in the preceding election cycles?
The only good form of term limitation is an effective opposition candidate.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HP2
November 11, 2009 12:01 PM in reply to The Old Grouch
President has term limits. Aren't we disenfranchising some voters?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ann Arbor
November 11, 2009 1:12 PM in reply to HP2
Yes and yes. The 22nd Amendment (also known as the "No more FDRs!" amendment) is anti-democratic.
And you can make a case, just on practical grounds, that it was a bad idea, because it turns every second-term president into a lame duck who has a hard time getting anything done.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
November 11, 2009 10:14 AM
Public financing of elections instead of term limits.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JohnW1141
November 11, 2009 10:16 AM
I wonder what percentage of the 40% who support the war in Afghanistan know from first hand experiecne what war is like.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jdb316
November 11, 2009 10:26 AM
I'm for term limits. One of the big problems we have in our government today, IMO, is that our elected "leaders" don't see the big picture and don't want to take the time and make the short-term sacrifices needed to really solve the problems in this country. They are always looking at their next election. So they go for quick fixes and statements loaded with glittering generalities that really won't fix a damn thing, but sound good and will get them re-elected.
If Ben Nelson, for example, no longer has to worry about winning re-election as a Democrat in an otherwise very pro-Republican state, maybe he wouldn't be so hesitant on supporting a public option.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
November 11, 2009 11:41 AM
Terms limits worked great for California. Their government is soooooo much more functional these days. NOT!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ondioline
November 11, 2009 12:17 PM
We already have term limits. Voting the bums out is the most effective term limit. Ask George H.W. Bush. Ask John Corzine. Ask Bob Ehrlich. Ask Jimmy Carter.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nels96
November 12, 2009 3:27 PM
It takes time to flush out the career professional politicians.
The only infallible, unstoppable, guaranteed way to get a truly new Congress is :
NEVER REELECT ANY INCUMBENT! AND DO IT EVERY ELECTION!
Don't let anyone serve more than one term. Some of the reasons to do this:
• It gives us a one-term-limited Congress without using amendments
• It encourages ordinary citizens to run for Congress
• It would be supported by 70% of the country who want term limits for Congress
• It is completely nonpartisan
• If repeated, it ends career politicians in Congress
• It opens the way to a “citizen Congress”
* It would open a torrent of fresh ideas to improve our government
• It ends the seniority system that keeps freshmen powerless
• It doesn’t cost money. But you MUST vote! Just don’t vote for an incumbent
• It is the only guaranteed, infallible, unstoppable way to “Throw the Bums Out”
• It takes effect immediately on Election Day
• If it doesn’t work, do it again and again! It will work eventually
NEVER REELECT ANYONE IN CONGRESS. AND DO IT EVERY ELECTION!
nelson lee walker of tenurecorrupts.com
send for your free NEVER REELECT bumper sticker
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?