TPMDC

Race For The Cure Founder Dismisses Socialized Medicine Scare Over New Mammogram Guidelines

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Nancy Brinker, founder of Susan G. Komen for the Cure

Read More

Health Care

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Nancy Brinker, the founder of the world's largest breast cancer cure advocacy group, is dismissing claims that last week's battle over new proposed breast cancer screening guidelines should be a warning sign in the health care reform debate. She told nervous women not to read anything into the timing of the controversial new guidelines, which she rejects.

"People release data all the time," Brinker said at a press conference this afternoon. Brinker is the founder of the Susan G. Komen For The Cure foundation, the largest organization in the world devoted to breast cancer research. She attacked the report, but dismissed attempts to make the report a political football in the health care debate.

"I don't think so," she said, when asked if the panel was "influenced" by the debate over reform.

Last week, a government health advisory panel released a report recommending a dramatic shift in the way women are screened for breast cancer in America. Among other things, the panel called on women to get fewer mammograms and to do fewer self-examinations than had previously been the norm. Though the report was the result of research that took place over the past two years, some Republicans claimed it was suggestive of the world under Democratic health care reform.

At a press conference last week, Republican leaders laid out the claim. From a report on in the Washington Post:

"This is how rationing starts," declared Jon Kyl of Arizona, the party's second-in-command in the Senate, during a news conference. "This is what we're going to expect in the future."

Said Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska: "Those recommendations will be used by the insurance companies as they make a determination as to what they're going to cover."

Brinker wouldn't speak to the politics of the situation, claiming that the Komen foundation steers clear of "partisan politics." (For their part, Democrats have rejected the Republican warnings about the recommendations and noted that the group has no power to make policy.)

Brinker expressed support for some of the central goals of the reform plans in the House and Senate, such as expanding access to coverage and eliminating preexisting condition screening. Brinker said her group was lobbying Congress to create a final bill that helps further the goals of the Komen foundation.

She attacked the new recommendations, and warned private insurance companies to ignore them or else. She said her group would publicly attack any company that changes what screening it will pay for based on the new guidelines from the government group.

"We'll be watching," she said.

Comments (3) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

November 23, 2009 8:27 PM   

"People release data all the time" -- a fact people seem to have ignored while scaring women to death and saying this is gender genocide.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 9:49 PM   

They also missed the rationale part of the report, i.e. the evidence shows that mammogram radiation is as responsible for deaths in the 40-49 age group as breast cancer is. I do believe these advisory panels are basically non-partisan, but in this case the fact that several members are also paid advisors to the health insurance industry and that they had no expert representation by either an oncologist or radiologist really opened them up excessive criticism and allowed their efforts to be be commandeered by partisans on both sides.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 24, 2009 12:50 AM   

@mmanion. I have not heard that in ANY of the press reports, and that's obviously the most important part of their rationale. The lack of an oncologist or radiologist does seem to be an important omission.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on