
As the debate kicks off in earnest today, the parties are predictably using the new Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Senate health care bill to their own benefit.
The White House is hailing the report as "more good news" about what the bill would mean for families.
White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer blogs:
Americans buying comparable health plans to what they have today in the individual market would see premiums fall by 14 to 20 percent. Those who get coverage through their employer today will likely see a decrease in premiums as well. And Americans who currently struggle to find coverage would see lower premiums because more people will be covered. In addition to the welcome relief on costs, the CBO reports that Americans will also have better insurance options. The CBO assumes that many people will take advantage of these better options and "buy up" to purchase better plans than are currently offered in the individual market.
Republicans, meanwhile, are seizing on the report to attack the reform bill.
The Republican Policy Committee says, "Premiums for individuals without employer-sponsored coverage would increase 10 to 13 percent (or $2,100 per family in 2016). The Democrats' bills therefore require individuals to purchase insurance that is more expensive than would be available under current law. In fact, CBO found that most people would see premium reductions under the bill."
This is true in a technical sense, as most people purchasing insurance on the individual market will be receiving subsidies that more than make up for the increased cost of premiums.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell followed suit on the floor this afternoon: "After 2,074 pages, trillions of dollars in new government spending, massive taxes and a half-trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare, most people, Mr. President, most people will see their insurance premiums go up," McConnell said.
In fact, the CBO report concluded that most peoples' premiums will drop. Premiums will rise on average in the individual market, but, as noted above, those costs will be offset to a great degree by federal premium assistance.
Additional reporting by Brian Beutler.
Xantar
November 30, 2009 3:51 PM
In other news, the sun rose in the east today...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
November 30, 2009 4:05 PM
The R's have also discovered that the analysis says "All...Americans...will...die...in...2012."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rob R.
December 1, 2009 12:55 AM
Actually, it's quite clear in the report (linked to in a previous article). The very first table says that the costs in the individual market will go up solely because people will buy greater coverage. For the same amount of coverage, premiums will drop 7 to 10%.
"Average premiums would be 27 percent to 30 percent higher because a greater amount of coverage would be obtained. In particular, the average insurance policy in this market would cover a substantially larger share of enrollees’ costs for health care (on average) and a slightly wider range of benefits. Those expansions would reflect both the minimum level of coverage (and related requirements) specified in the proposal and people’s decisions to purchase more extensive coverage in response to the structure of subsidies."
(emphasis mine)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?