TPMDC

Reid Continues To Target Republican Obstruction

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is on a kick. Personally frustrated, and under pressure from the left, Reid has decided to take direct aim at Republican obstruction, and he's doing so in angry terms.

"For anybody watching, what's taken place the last three years knows the Republicans have become experts in wasting time, the American taxpayers' time, the American people's time, and yesterday was no exception," Reid said on the Senate floor Wednesday.

Democrats can't pass off all of the blame for the glacial pace of progress in the last several months. With a 60-member caucus, they in theory have sufficient numbers to overcome GOP filibusters of key agenda items, if they could only agree to stay united. But even if they did muscle their agenda through the procedural labyrinth of the Senate, they still wouldn't be able to stop the foot-dragging.

Republicans have threatened to filibuster 58 times this year. Thirty times, they've actually forced cloture votes--and when cloture is invoked, the Senate must usually wait hours before the underlying issue can pass. More crucially, they've also blocked nominations and legislation and delayed proceedings in other ways, all of which waste precious legislating hours in a body that spends almost as much time out of session as it does in session.

This week Reid was steamed that individual members had forced three cloture votes on a bill to extend unemployment compensation. Each of these filibusters delayed progress on the bill by hours, and yet, at the end of the day, the overwhelming majority of the GOP ultimately voted for cloture.

On October 21, Republicans objected when Democrats tried to move the bill to the floor for debate--the filibuster went down 87-13. On October 29, when Reid tried to incorporate some amendments, two Republicans managed to hold up the bill yet again. That cloture vote was 85-2. Later that day when Reid tried to bring the bill up for a vote, a Republican filibuster led to yet another cloture vote. 97-1. When the up or down vote was finally allowed, the unemployment extension passed unanimously, 98-0.

These delays weren't ultimately about the substance of the bill--the entire Senate wanted to extend unemployment compensation. They were based on the fact that Democrats wouldn't allow debate on amendments having to do with ACORN and similarly unrelated issues.

"Yesterday, Republicans used every trick in the book to slow and stall and ensure we can't do important work," Reid said. "Seven thousand people lost their ability to have a check. Maybe it's getting cold."

The unemployment episode is illustrative. It's the logical extension of a pattern of obstruction that has the Republicans set to shatter records. The liberal group People for the American Way have demonstrated fairly conclusively that the GOP is on pace to double the previous record for filibusters on executive branch nominees set...by the Republicans under President Bill Clinton.

Last year, with months left to go in the 110th Congress, Congressional expert Norm Ornstein highlighted the extent to which the GOP had taken what was already an escalating trend of minority obstruction and put it on steroids.

This Congress, they're picking up where they left off.

Next week, Reid is likely to have to file cloture on President Obama's first judicial nominee, David Hamilton, who's been waiting on a confirmation vote for months. Only four years after threatening to use the "nuclear option" to eliminate the filibuster of judicial nominations altogether, Republicans are gearing up to do just that.

And that's to say nothing of the floor debate over health care which is expected to take weeks, and involve two cloture votes (three, if you count a likely cloture vote on the conference report) and scores of dilatory amendments. Each of these will cause their own delays. And though Democrats have some tools at their disposal to blunt these tactics, the Senate rules make it impossible for them to keep things moving at a more reasonable pace.

Join the Conversation!

44 comments

Recommend Recommend (1)

November 6, 2009 5:36 PM   

Our system is broken. I'm going to bet the framers never had this in mind.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 5:55 PM    in reply to mike from Arlington

Agreed. The Senate is dysfunctional, and the filibuster is why. The rules assume senators act responsibly. That's not a valid assumption with Republicans. I'd like to see the filibuster replaced with rules guaranteeing a long debate if the minority wants it, even delays of weeks, but not the ability to stop a vote ever taking place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 7:49 PM    in reply to mike from Arlington

Yup. They should somehow put an insurance-like cap on the number of times a given group can filibuster in a week, month of ever. Oops! You've filibustered 15 times this month? Sorry, you're all out of f-busters for the remainder of the year y'all!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 2:39 PM    in reply to mike from Arlington

They certainly didn't -- the filibuster isn't in the Constitution, it's just in the Senate rules. And the number of votes required has been changed before when the minority abused it. That is clearly the case here. All it requires is a simple vote, not a Constitutional amendment.

And, of course, overcoming a filibuster. Sigh.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 1:05 AM    in reply to mike from Arlington

The Dems should have held their ground (insted of caving again to moderate Dems) on Bush judicial nominees when Frist was Sen leader and allowed the Repubs to remove filibuster for judges. Bush got his judges anyway and now the Dems are stuck because the Repubs have no conscience.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 6:38 AM    in reply to mike from Arlington

This is exactly what the framers had in mind, to prevent what Madions called "the tyranny of the majority." The rules themselves are not at fault here, it is the people using them for what I would call despicable purposes.

Thanks.

mp

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 8:24 PM    in reply to Michael Powe

What prevents the tyranny of the Minority?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 8:29 PM    in reply to loria

Racist.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 7:46 AM    in reply to Silence

Crossdresser.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 5:40 PM   

Reid needs more than a floor speech to get this message out. this is all the GOP has, and they'll do it the next seven years if they have to. Delay absolutely everything, and it slows down movement on the big bills. Healthcare should have been passed before August and now it's likely going to go into the new year. Every week health reform is pushed back, it's a week less the dems have to focus on financial reforms, climate reforms, immigration etc.

GOP is hoping to make huge gains in 2010 and then saying "Obama lost his mandate". The DNC, The Obama Administration, Reid and Pelosi should be making a huge issue out of this.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 7:00 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

I think the Republicans are doing exactly what they should be doing. They are using any and all means they have available to obstruct any progress in both the House and Senate. Actually, I would put the blame on Harry Reid for allowing this to go on. Harry Reid has an incredible opportunity to push almost any legislation the Democrat's want passed; i.e., he has a Super Majority (60 votes). He can overcome any obstacle by getting his party in-line and moving for a cloture vote on everything. The problem as I see it is that Harry Reid does not have the wherewithal to lead the Senate. Democrats are intelligent individuals that require handling to get them to all agree; Harry Reid cannot do it. We need a Chuck Schumer in as Majority Leader to help wrangle-up the votes and get legislation passed. Moreover, Harry Reid could have easily kept the Senate in session and passed HR3548 a month ago. Instead he continued to make idle threats and only now that it is all over he gets a backbone; give me a break. It's time for a change in the Senate and it starts with electing a real leader who is accustomed to working with all types of people. We need to elect the hardest working person in the Senate and that is Chuck Schumer from New York.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 8:04 PM    in reply to DrMiami

In the Land of Oz. Besides, he has 58 actual Dems. Yes, the Socialist Party guy is typically a gimme, so there's 59.

And let's not forget the corporatist DINOs that gave up their humanity whoring for their industry masters. And the other now-non-DINO Lieberman. If that's a strong hand that can get anything done, I have a wonderful bridge to sell.

The obvious ploy for the Rethuglicans is All Politics, All the Time, and the rest of the citizenry can nicely go eff themselves over whining about that big black economic hole these anti-republic Neos dug (Greenspan: "I discovered a flaw in my philosophy..." Right. Atlas Shrugged all right, and sent the world economy down the latrine hole). Boy howdy, they're sure working on the good old moral high ground, aren't they now?

Yup. Just what they should be doing.

Since the Great Unwashed rest of us and our real life-and-death issues don't matter so much as creating chaos until they get their evil claws back on the reins of powere once more, then they are indeed showing the wisdom of their wily ways.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 3:05 AM    in reply to TheRealFish

Thanks for that. A reality check now and then is good for bringing our side back to reality also.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 6:44 AM    in reply to DrMiami

Please, not Chuck Schumer. The guy is owned by Wall Street. And he's not open to a moderate 'J-Street' approach to an intractable Israeli-Palestinian situation. Durbin or Wyden or Kerry. But not Schumer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 9:03 AM    in reply to DrMiami

I've not been a fan of Harry Reid's methods during the drafting of the health care legislation. And I believe that it's time to eliminate the filibuster. But Reid's point here has nothing to do with the fact that he has 60 votes and should be able to control the Senate. It's that the Republicans are delaying legislation even when they eventually vote overwhelmingly themselves for cloture and for the final legislation. That has nothing to do with having control. It's about the Republicans abusing the rules for the sake of doing so.

We should use the nuclear option and eliminate the filibuster. We have nothing to gain from the false civility of the filibuster. Provide a reasonable amount of time for debate and then force an "up-and-down" vote.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 2:37 PM    in reply to BobOnLSD

Actually, they don't even have to use the "nuclear option," they just have to vote to change the rules. The "nuclear option" was so titled not because eliminating the filibuster would be a big deal, but because the proposed Republican process for doing it at the time involved breaking the rules by supporting an obviously dishonest parliamentary ruling. They didn't have the votes, so the only way they could have eliminated it was by cheating, that's why it was "nuclear." Republicans are constantly trying to cover it up by applying the "nuclear option" label to normal actions they disagree with, but we shouldn't forget the magnitude of their corruption -- not only cheating, but publicly discussing a detailed plan of how they were going to cheat.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 2:44 PM    in reply to BobOnLSD

It is a mistake to compare membership in the Senate Democratic Caucus with membership in a company or some kind of group that can choose or reject members. These Senators do not "belong" to the Democratic Party. They are relatively independent contractors who choose to associate themselves with others and those who frequently belong to the alliance choose to call it being a Democrat.

The Democratic Senators are independent contractors who do not depend on belonging to the Democratic Party to get elected. They are the equivalent of feudal Barons who have their own armies. The titular King is dependent on them rather than them depending on the King for their position. They are not going to cede any more central control to anyone than they have to. Compare them to Polish Barons who refused to permit the Polish King almost any control at all. The armies all belonged to the Barons.

Republicans are more dependent on centrally supplied money and on blocks of voters who are controlled by someone else (evangelical leaders, talk show hosts and other media stars.) Since Republican voters are often Authoritarian personalities, they want central leadership. The Republican Party and it's propaganda arms provide this leadership, and they have developed techniques of selecting politicians that are under more centralized control. Since Republicans represent values that are more outside the mainstream, they are dependent on the party more than are Democrats, so they cede more control to the Party Caucus leader than Democrats do.

How dependent party politicians are on central party control can be determined by how many members frequently go off the reservation. Democrats are a lot less under central control than Republicans are.

Harry Reid simply has fewer tools for control of Democratic Senators than Mitch McConnell has over Republican Senators. That same is true in the House. and because of the comparative independence of Democratic Senators, there is no other Senator in the Democratic Caucus likely to be able to obtain any more control over the relatively independent Democrats than Harry Reid has.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 8:56 AM    in reply to Richardxx

Long-winded but very well said.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 8:52 AM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Exactly. There is a time for everything. Now is the time to show these repugs that Dems can be tough and mean too and besides, let the American people know what they are up to. Their agenda of delay must be defeated. Its time to get mean and tough with these liars and obstructionists.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 5:57 PM   

The fact that the GOP is abusing the filibuster far beyond any previous Congress is increasingly leading me to the conclusion that getting rid of the filibuster via the nuclear option may be necessary.

Not even really for health reform, but for the Senate to be able to get its routine business done. A significant part of the GOP right now only seems to care about being obstructionist and stopping anything from getting done.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 6:06 PM   

We, of course, are forgetting that this is also GREATLY enabled by conservative Democrats and one conservative Independent.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 7:52 PM    in reply to josephcast

Lieberman is not independant.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 6:13 PM   

Every Democrat needs to make the point on a regular basis that every day the Republicans delay the health care bill, an average of 120 Americans die. Keep repeating, "How long are the Republicans willing to play politics with your life?"

And they need to threaten to do the same to the blue dogs. No party loyalty works both ways.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 10:52 PM    in reply to Powkat

And what is the average age of those 120 people? I bet it falls squarely in the Republican sweet spot for voters. It's an older demographic that leans Republican, and that is exactly the demographic they are screwing the most.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 6:37 PM   

If the Senate is to continue to be hugely unrepresentative (which is is to be), it should at least be responsive. I'd be all for getting rid of the filibuster, even in the knowledge that future Republican majorities would be able to have its way with a simple majority as well. They could pass their stupid legislation, watch as people suffered, and be voted out of office as a result.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 6:49 PM   

I think the Republicans are doing exactly what they should be doing. They are using any and all means they have available to obstruct any progress in both the House and Senate. Actually, I would put the blame on Harry Reid for allowing this to go on. Harry Reid has an incredible opportunity to push almost any legislation the Democrat's want passed; i.e., he has a Super Majority (60 votes). He can overcome any obstacle by getting his party in-line and moving for a cloture vote on everything. The problem as I see it is that Harry Reid does not have the wherewithal to lead the Senate. Democrats are intelligent individuals that require handling to get them to all agree; Harry Reid cannot do it. We need a Chuck Schumer in as Majority Leader to help wrangle-up the votes and get legislation passed. Moreover, Harry Reid could have easily kept the Senate in session and passed HR3548 a month ago. Instead he continued to make idle threats and only now that it is all over he gets a backbone; give me a break. It's time for a change in the Senate and it starts with electing a real leader who is accustomed to working with all types of people. We need to elect the hardest working person in the Senate and that is Chuck Schumer from New York.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 7:05 PM    in reply to DrMiami

I feel that we Democrats are somewhat lucky to have people in Congress who do not, unlike Rethugs, just "Do what you're told". Yes I'd like to see HCR in my lifetime but I'm glad Democrats are not lemmings.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 6, 2009 8:57 PM   

these pretenders can pat each other on the back when the senate is roughly equal because no one has to step forward.

but when it reaches 60 then they become exposed for what they are.
a club that cuts deals and does as least as possible for the people while serving their corporates interests.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 2:06 AM   

Harry Reid should be supported.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 5:39 AM    in reply to USgreentech

Agreed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 2:54 PM    in reply to USgreentech

Yes, I agree too---he has a very tough job getting health care to the President.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EdA

user-pic

November 7, 2009 2:53 AM   

Gee, some 7 months after the Republicans made it explicitly, abundantly clear that they intended to do whatever they could to block anything positive from taking place, the poster adult for Stockholm syndrome realizes that it's time to make the GOP put its mouth where its mouth is. So on issue after issue, rather than losing a few hours by telling the Republicans to make good on their filibuster efforts, which have collapsed, he's wasted weeks cowering in a corner for fear that they MIGHT try to filibuster.

MONTHS wasted in vain hopes of getting a Republican to support a greatly watered down health care reform when Republican leadership vowed to make ANY health care reform the President's Waterloo.

And months wasted, and still being wasted, in pandering to Joe Lieberman, who has repeatedly expressed his willingness to sabotage health care reform for his personal financial benefit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 6:08 AM    in reply to EdA

Fully agree.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 9:42 AM   

It's not like this sort of thing hasn't happened before, you know.

1850s through the early 1860s for instance.

Come to think of it, wasn't that due to the crazies south of the Mason-Dixon Line, too? Some things don't seem to change. They were wrong then, and they're wrong now. They just don't have the decency to STFU.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 7, 2009 11:55 PM   

The way to end it is to stop blathering on about "cloture" and force an actual 24/7 filibuster every time. Them old sons of bitches would not last 2 days before their prostates would explode.

Come on, Senator Reid, call their bluff.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 3:13 AM    in reply to runfastandwin

Yeah that would be good if they actually had to be present to stage a fillibuster. These days, they don't even have to be present and speechifying... they just need to "indicate" that they're fillibustering. Sucks, because I sure would like to see the Republicans stage an actual, old-fashioned filibuster. They wouldn't last a day... it would be too much actual work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 2:50 AM   

The GOP obstructionism is out of control. No wonder for the rebranding.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 3:24 AM   

Lobbyists are bribing the politicians.
There is no other way to put it.

Until this stops, we get watered down bills.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 5:48 PM   

When the hell is he going to get on Jackass Joe Lieberman's case ?

C

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 7:29 PM   

I don't care if it's done behind closed doors, but it should be spelled out, plain and simple -- he can strut all he wants, but if Lieberman filibusters or fails to provide a needed vote for health care reform, he should immediately lose his committee chairmanship and be stripped of seniority. That's only fair -- if he doesn't want to contribute, he shouldn't reap any benefits.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 9:02 AM    in reply to wake up

What is so hard to understand about that. He wouldn't last a day as a repug, b/c he'd have to toe the party line.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 8, 2009 11:38 PM   

Look at how fast the House got to a vote on the Health Care bill.

The filibuster and the cloture rule are tools that are not in the constitution, and need to be gotten rid of.

The GOP foot-dragging is, of course, intentional. When they know every day that goes by is one day closer to when they believe a Republican will be in the White House, they have every reason to stall EVERYTHING.

What we need is 12-16 years of Democrats in the White House and controlling both houses of Congress. By that time, the GOP will be so weakened, and the Dems will have named so many federal judges (even with all the knuckle-dragging - oops, I mean food dragging). Yes, that is a long time.

What we REALLY need to do is get rid of a bicameral legislature. The low population states have driven far too much in this country and obstructed what is good for the high populations states. This is NOT a nation of one man, one vote. Not when the 2 Senators from Wyoming and 2 from Vermont have as much say in the Senate as the 2 from California and Texas. (I picked one of each party there, intentionally.)

Countries with Parliaments get bills passed in weeks, where it will have taken nearly a year to pass (IF it passes) the health bill. And the GOP likes it that way.

Harry should have been mad long ago. Maybe better late than never, but GO GET 'EM, HARRY!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 8:30 AM   

GOD party leadership today:
Is your name Q. Mitch McConnell - A. NO!
Is your name Q. John Boehner - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Eric Cantor - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Michelle Bachmann - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Marsha Blackburn - A. NO!
Is your name Q. John Ensign - A. NO!
Is your name Q. John McCain - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Roy Blunt - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Lindsey Graham - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Paul Ryan - A. NO!
Is your name Q. Newt Gingrich - A. NO!
Generic GOD party representative: Q. What's your name - A. NO!


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 9, 2009 8:45 AM   

If Harry Reid thought things were tough before, just watch how much manure the repugs will be piling up at the barn door just to prevent a bill being brought to a vote in the Senate.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on