TPMDC

Sebelius Unveils State By State Analysis Of Impact Of Health Care Reform

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today unveiled state-by-state analyses of the beneficial impacts of health care reform. Using the Senate bill, the report underlines, among other things, the number of working and middle class people who would receive federal assistance, and the extent to which the legislation would reduce the number of uninsured in that state.

So, to pick three states totally at random, if you wanted to know what the goodies for Nebraska, Arkansas, and Louisiana, would be, you can just click.

And, in case you're wondering, the reports do not address the state-by-state impact of the public option.

Comments (3) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

November 23, 2009 2:42 PM   

Beat a dead horse comment: it would be nice if we could follow up on Josh's posts. That's how blogs work, right?

Anyway, to thread drift:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/11/more_thoughts_on_the_public_option.php

As a lot of people have pointed out, the value of the PO is two fold:

* it draws GOP/ConservaDems/Blue Dog/Big Health attention away from *other* potential rollbacks

* simply creating it allows for something to be built open

On the first, we knew that there would be a constant ConservaDems/Blue Dog effort to water down all aspects of the bill. And they have, with all sorts of things. But the PO has draw tremendous attention and effort to try to kill off, which has allowed Progressive to hold firm on other things while "compromising" repeatidly on the PO. If it already died, we would be talking about subsidies being cut more, etc.

On the second, we're getting to why Big Health doesn't want it in any form. Medicare wasn't the Medicare we have now when it was passed. Social Security wasn't the Social Security we have now when it was passed. They were foundations that were built on and frame works expanded upon.

If you get a PO, you then can down the road do Reconciliation on aspects of it. But you have a great difficulty of creating the PO out of whole cloth in Reconciliation.

That's why Big Health wants to kill it dead.

I'm in complete agreement with people who say that the PO that's left in the bill is almost a meaningless PO if that's all that ever happens to it.

But I also think that if people like Robert Reich take a step back and look at the long term potential for the framework, especially when out health system hits the wall (which is sooner than later with the small amounts of reform in this package), is the value of it.

So it is worth fighting for on the two reasons above: creates a framework to expand, and also has drawn massive fire and political capital away from other items that ConservaDems and Blue Dogs would like to see watered down as well.

John

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 3:37 PM   

Sebelius has proven to be a super tough fighter for health care reform! Snark...what a bland piece of toast she has been!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 24, 2009 11:34 AM   

If any health insurance reform bill contains the Stupid Amendment, it needs to be rejected. I will be asking my senators to vote against it, with the greatest regret. It simply isn't acceptable to trade women's choice rights to get more customers for health insurance companies.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on