
Last week, during a Rules Committee meeting on the health care bill, Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX) angered a lot of people when he implied it's OK to charge women more for health insurance, comparing them to smokers. Now, his Democratic challenger is trying to cash in on the outrage.
First, what happened: At the meeting, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) had been railing against gender discrimination in insurance pricing when Sessions interjected, "But that's not against the law."
"No, but we would make it against the law," Pallone responded. "Why do you have a problem with that? Why should a woman pay more than a man?"
"Well, we're all different," Sessions said. "Why should a smoker pay more?"
Sessions' comment has, not surprisingly, touched off backlash from various circles, especially women's groups.
Now his Democratic challenger, attorney Grier Raggio, as well as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, has seized the opportunity to raise money off the comment, blasting out emails to supporters attacking Sessions' comments.
The campaign sent out a plea from Raggio's mother, Louise Raggio, a well-known Texas lawyer who fought for women's rights in the state.
"When I first became a lawyer in the 1950s, Texas women could not buy or sell their own property, could not sign contracts, and could not have control over their own paychecks or open their own bank accounts without their husbands' permission," the email reads.
"We have to send a message to Pete Sessions and his allies in Congress when they try to turn the clocks back on women's rights - we can't let this stand."
As of last night, Raggio had pulled in $25,000, according to a DCCC spokesman. Numbers for today weren't readily available.
david mizner
November 10, 2009 2:21 PM
Wasn't it Pete Sessions who made the smoker comment, not Jeff, the Senator from Alabama who kinda digs the Klan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Subliminability
November 10, 2009 2:25 PM
Yeah -- and the photo is of Senator Sessions, not Rep. Sessions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tosh
November 10, 2009 2:34 PM in reply to Subliminability
I was thinking the same thing: when did Jeffey decide to Texas to take a lesser job in the House? :)
John
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shooter242
November 10, 2009 2:31 PM
Here is a perfect example of why Obamacare will not deliver whatever it promises. When political considerations are mandated regardless of cost, the business model either fails or is continued regardless of cost. Like AmTrack or Social Security.
Any claims to savings of any sort is BS.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
November 10, 2009 2:36 PM in reply to shooter242
This is even dumber than your usual tripe. Have you been taking stupid pills?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
November 10, 2009 4:34 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
He doesn't need to.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
November 10, 2009 2:46 PM in reply to shooter242
The business model HAS failed. That's why we have the world's crappiest insurance. Time to chuck it.
And calling it "Obamacare" won't change that basic fact, nor convince anyone outside a tea party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
November 10, 2009 2:55 PM in reply to ericf
The business model HAS failed. That's why we have the world's crappiest insurance. Time to chuck it.
we are not chucking it. just mandating it, and using tax dollars to help pay for it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ericf
November 10, 2009 5:18 PM in reply to Indie Pro
The changes are more substantial than you're granting. Ending rescission and exclusion for pre-existing condition is huge. AHIP still hates the bill, and to me that's a good thing.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chimpale
November 10, 2009 2:57 PM in reply to shooter242
You're right. How can insurance company CEOs hope to maintain a compensation level of $10-20 million annually if they can't squeeze consumers? Why should the insurance companies have to assume any risk at all? If they want to sell policies only to healthy people and refuse to pay expensive claims, why that's just exercising sound business practices. /snark
You probably haven't heard this before, shooter, but one of the big reasons for the health care reform effort is to make it so that the millions of Americans who can't afford private health insurance, or who are being denied coverage, will have a way to get the health care they need. As it stands right now, it's the insurance companies who are operating as death panels and they've been executing about 47,000 Americans a year.
And, quite frankly, I don't give a flying fuck about the insurance companies' ability to maximize profit. They've sucked up enough of people's money, often giving nothing in return, and killed off enough people that they can go straight to hell, as far as I'm concerned. Their business model is "fuck the customer".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kuyleh
November 10, 2009 6:04 PM in reply to shooter242
How far did you have to stick your head up your rear to get that one? it has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
free2bme
November 10, 2009 3:04 PM
Sessions K is K obviously a K racist...now K he has proven K to be a sexist K.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
November 10, 2009 4:39 PM
Finally,something conservative and liberal women can agree on: Sen. Session is sexist and wrong. He argues that women like smokers can be charged more -- presumptively because they use health care more. Well, the women will fix him -- the extra cost comes from a voluntary activity -- child bearing -- the women will go on strike like the women in Japan. Why does Sen. Session hate child bearing? What does he have against America?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CoolOnion
November 10, 2009 4:58 PM
Help TX-32 Dems kick Pete Sessions worthless butt out of Congress by giving to Grier Raggio's campaign today. I know it's a terrible time to ask for money, but to change the tone of the nation, we need to give everything we can to opponents of top troublemakers like Pete "The GOP-should-act-like-the-Taliban" Sessions. Even if you've only got two bucks to give, throw it into the pot, and send the link to Grier Raggio's Act Blue Page to your friends asking them to do the same!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
November 10, 2009 5:29 PM
My mind is going blank. Who was the dumb shit Senator/Representative who made a similar remark about women and health insurance and got a Class A smackdown from a woman on the committee?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ally
November 10, 2009 6:01 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
Senator Stabenow beautifully crushes woman-hater Kyl
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/25/stabenow-kyl-maternity/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
November 10, 2009 7:03 PM in reply to ally
Ah, yes. How could I forget. Next fall the Dems should string all these together into a single tapestry of Republican misogyny and run them in every state.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
cantgetfooledagain
November 10, 2009 8:28 PM
no, the photo is definitely that of misogynist Congressman Pete Sessions.
there's still time to send money to his opponent - Grier Raggio - http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/22993
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?