TPMDC

Spokesman: Schumer Open To Public Option Negotiations, But They Haven't Started

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

In light of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's statement tonight--that he welcomes negotiations on a public option compromise--Sen. Chuck Schumer's spokesman Brian Fallon emails a statement to TPMDC. He says discussions with centrists, such as they are, are in the earliest stages.

"Leading up to tonight's vote, some senators expressed a desire to discuss the public option currently in the Senate bill. Of course, Senator Schumer did not rule that out. But no such talks have yet taken place, and there is not any compromise at hand beyond what Leader Reid has already inserted into the bill. Senator Schumer remains a strong proponent of the opt-out, level playing field public option."

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) told TPMDC earlier today that Schumer had been tasked as the point man in negotiations between senators who support a public option, and those who prefer a "trigger" compromise.

This statement seems to suggests that those discussions are in their infancy, whatever Schumer's role in them is.

Join the Conversation!

13 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 21, 2009 10:17 PM   

The opt out is the compromise that gives each one of the pretend democrats the cover to pass this bill. They can cheerlead their own health care derived states to opt out! There is no issue for them to oppose. This has always been about money and serving their corporate pimps! Frame the issue correctly or lose the debate and health care reform.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 21, 2009 10:30 PM   

HEre is my proposal for those Schumer negotiations:
1.Opt in for states, beginning 2010
2.Plan would begin, if triggered, for other states in 2014,
3.Once triggered states may opt IF they provide certain alternative guidelines to ensure access to health insurance for all
4.keep the Conrad Co-op as a tag along
5.FRee Choice amendment to keep Wyden in
6.Add abrogation of antitrust exemption to keep Sanders in
THEN-everyone has their piece of the cake....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 21, 2009 10:35 PM    in reply to sanssouci0

Well here's the problem with the antitrust, Nelson wants it out. Sanders may want it in, but we'll see what happens tonight.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 4:02 AM   

Who are these guys fooling? Besides the chuckleheaded class I mean.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 12:17 PM   

We compromised 4 FUCKING TIMES. We wanted SP we compromise. We wanted Medicare rates, we compromise. We wanted negotiated rates, we compromise. NO MORE COMPROMISING what the hell is wrong with you people. This is ridiculous 4 senators can dictate to 55.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 12:23 PM    in reply to theone718

After awhile you begin to figure that the 4 senators are only enabling most of the other 55 to use them as an excuse for not doing what they had no intention of doing in the first place. That's why I figure they all have to be held accountable for their failure to deliver.

Question for the final bill: how would you feel about this bill if it was proposed by the Bush administration? Because by the time its done, it may as well have been proposed by the Bush administration.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 1:14 PM    in reply to bluebell

We got nothing from the last administration. No need to wonder what it would have been like. Eight years and nothing even came close to this.

Actually, the GOP did present a "bill" that and the Dems did reject it. Remember? It left 52 million people uninsured?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 3:13 PM    in reply to VivaAmerica!

Not so! They did Medicare D and when the Dem bill is finished it will be do for insurance what Medicare D did for pharmas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 1:23 PM    in reply to bluebell

Yes, you're right, Mary Landrieu is just the cover Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown need to act out their secret desire to scuttle the PO.

So how has persistently stabbing your allies in the face worked out so far, bluebell? I bet you're the most popular gal at work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 3:15 PM    in reply to Stroszek

Allies? Bernie is not a Democrat. So I see you had a hard time coming up with names. I don't know enough about Brown yet to call him an ally.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 10:09 PM    in reply to bluebell

But you know enough about the other 54 to call them enemies? Yes, Brown, Rockefeller, Kerry, Boxer, Stabenow, Whitehouse, Mikulski, Durbin, Schumer, Cantwell, Merkley, Franken . . .

all of them screaming for a public option but secretly praying for Lieberman and Nelson to scuttle the public option so they can look like complete fools when they are force to vote for a bill without it or trash all healthcare. Yeah, right!

Do you ever get tired of saying the most absurd bullshit? If you ever said anything even remotely related to basic reality, you might find it refreshing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 22, 2009 2:17 PM   

How do you rationally base your strategy for reform on an approach guaranteed to trigger the diehard cultural paranoia on which the Republicans have depeneded for almost a century? In the end, that's all that fighting for the public option actually does.

I have always believed that the public option is a strategy, not an objective. Moreover, it's not the ONLY strategy for achieving one of the REAL objectives - gutting the unaccountable power of the health insurance industry to control access to health care.

I would turn Lincoln's threat against her, by forcing her to base her opposition to health insurance reform on protecting the interests of the health insurance industry, NOT objections to the public option. I would do the same to Nelson, and also to Lieberman and Snowe.

If the public option goes away, but in return, Nelson, Lincoln et al have to give on the antitrust exemption and the ERISA loophole, that would gut the industry's power.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 23, 2009 5:50 PM   

"If the public option goes away, but in return, Nelson, Lincoln et al have to give on the antitrust exemption and the ERISA loophole, that would gut the industry's power."

That sounds like something a progressive could get behind, along with banning rescission and the guaranteed issue. And the mandate has to be the weakest possible version. Change the 3:1 rating to 2:1.

Or: lose the PO, lose the mandate.

I'd go for either compromise and live again to fight another day.

Failing that: Kill the bill. Share the love.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on