TPMDC

Steele: 'GOP Renaissance Has Begun'...And I Helped

Spread the word and support this article by retweeting it!


RNC Chairman Michael Steele

Read More

GOP, Michael Steele

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

RNC chair Michael Steele bounded up to the podium at his post-election press conference at Republican Party HQ in Washington this morning.

"How's everyone feeling?" he said with a big grin. When the two dozen or so bleary eyed reporters in the audience failed to respond to the question, his grin grew even larger. "That good, huh?"

For the next 30 minutes, Steele raved on about his party's victories last night -- and on his role in making them happen.

"The GOP renaissance has begun," he said, before borrowing a line from President Obama's campaign last year. "This election was not about 'the change we need.' It's about the change the American people want."

As he has in numerous TV interviews last night and this morning, Steele said that the GOP's big wins in Virginia and New Jersey indicated that the party has come back from a string of losses that he said left many observers questioning whether Republicans had a future as a national party in America. He again said the party's defeat in the hotly contested NY-23 congressional race was more about a "flawed process" in the way the local party selected nominees, rather than "a battle for the soul of the party" that activists on the left and the right made it out to be.

"I'm not concerned about that," he said to questions about the ideological takeaways from NY-23. "I'm more concerned about a Democratic party that has a 60-seat majority in the Senate and can't pass a health care bill."

But Steele did focus on one topic he's largely ignored in the initial coverage of last night's races: his own tenure as chairman. Fraught with turmoil, gaffes and public calls for his resignation from party leaders early on, Steele's time leading the GOP has been dramatic to say the least. He suggested last night's win means all that is behind him.

"It's not about credit," he said when asked how responsible he was for the wins. "It's about sharing credit with the winners...and giving credit to the volunteers and party activists that made this happen."

Steele reeled off a list of numbers that suggested credit to the RNC was not exactly the furthest thing from his mind, however. He said the RNC spent around $13 million in both New Jersey and Virginia, and claimed to have ramped up the party's grassroots operation -- as he promised he would when he took over the RNC last November.

"Our volunteers contacted 5.8 million voters during the course of this campaign," he said. "That's three times the number we reached in 2008."

"I'm in the business of winning," he added. "My responsibility was to move us out of the ash heap of losses."

Steele scoffed at critics of his fundraising prowess. "I laugh at people who don't think it's a big deal that I'm only $1.3 million behind the Democrats in fundraising," he said. "They've got the presidency and both houses of Congress and I'm only $1.3 million behind? I mean, come on."

The chair said he learned "a lot of lessons" from the race to help make things go even better for Republicans next time around. He also gave some insight into how he motivated his candidates to victory this year.

"I told every nominee the same thing," he said. "I'll help you win, I'll do whatever I can, but don't screw it up."

Join the Conversation!

44 comments

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 4, 2009 11:15 AM   

Shorter Steele: I get to keep my job.

congratulations Mike! I'd hate to see a brother out of work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:18 AM   

Ahh, I can't wait until we kick their asses in 2010.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:18 PM    in reply to LuxVeritas

I think that may be harder to do if a weak-ass Health care bill is passed :)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:20 AM   

more like a medieval revival, The Endarkenment, to use a word from the good poet Jeffrey McDaniels.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:24 AM   

"This election was not about 'the change we need.' It's about the change the American people want."

LOL, what a moron. i mean, think about that statement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:36 AM    in reply to nova voter

lol! people don't want what's good for them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:49 AM    in reply to VivaAmerica!

maybe people simply don't what what "you" think is good for them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:56 AM    in reply to Lalo35adm

Given that it was Michael Steele, not VivaAmerica, making the statement, it would appear that what is intended is that the people simply don't what what Michael Steele thinks is good for them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:09 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

The ancient company IBM made its name in the 20th century by going in and selling customers what they needed, not what they wanted. They then set about crafting the best solution to meet that need, and data centers everywhere filled up with IBM computers, helping to pave the way to the ready information access we have today.

Government by "wants" leads to most of the messes we have now. We do not need 400:1 CEO:Worker compensation imbalance. We do not need insurance companies that throw people out of coverage. We do not need banks that are too big to fail taking handouts AND THEN turning around and raising interest rates.

Hell, I want a lot of things, but what are my REAL needs? This is what govt. must satisfy. What you want is part of the liberty equation, and thus a personal responsibility.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:54 PM    in reply to Marioth

Lalo wants the wizard to give him a brain.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 8:24 PM    in reply to nova voter

It makes no sense. I guess it sounds good to the common Republican voter though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:33 AM   

Well, good to see they're still delusional and incapable of drawing correct inferences from objective data. Thank God. There's still hope for us in 2010, after all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:48 AM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

He again said the party's defeat in the hotly contested NY-23 congressional race was more about a "flawed process" in the way the local party selected nominees, rather than "a battle for the soul of the party" that activists on the left and the right made it out to be

What do you mean? They are being totally rational here. By 'flawed process', I'm sure that Steele is acknowledging the schism that went on there in the GOP and that they are going to acknowledge the problem, go through the painful process of finding solutions, and kick the crazies to the curb.

lol, yeah, right.... ;)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:50 AM    in reply to matyra

flawed process is that GOP candidate was appointed by party establishment without any kind of primary.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:04 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

Which is to say they found a candidate that might have actually won rather than an ideologically pure, but unelectable candidate. Some flaw. I hope they continue to correct such flaws all over the country next election cycle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:12 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

So if they had chosen a right wing loon through the primary process and HE had lost, that would've been better?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

November 4, 2009 12:50 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

You mean Hoffman decided not to run in a primary? and to pull a Lieberman instead?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:06 PM    in reply to Lalo35adm

or a flawed process where an out of town Dick Army with a wad of cash barges in and tries to force a nut job on the local populace ?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 11:53 AM   

"I'm not concerned about [ideological takeaways from NY-23]... I'm more concerned about a Democratic party that has a 60-seat majority in the Senate and can't pass a health care bill."

What do you know. I actually agree with Mr. Steele on this point. I am also more concerned about Senate Democrats than about the NY-23rd. Of course, Steele's concern and my own have different characters (he is interested in preventing them from passing a bill, I am interested in seeing them get past the obstacles to successful passage), but if Mr. Steele thinks that Health Insurance reform is more important than the results of NY-23, I can at least agree with him on that much.

"I'm in the business of winning," he added. "My responsibility was to move us out of the ash heap of losses."

Er, o.k., if you say so. If two victories are enough, in your own estimation, to move you out of the "ash heap" then I am happy for you. From where I am standing, however, I think that Ramesh Ponnuru got it right last night when he said "It's... the Republicans' best election night since 2004. Of course that's a low bar."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

LFC

user-pic

November 4, 2009 11:59 AM   

"My responsibility was to move us out of the ash heap of losses."

"That's why NY-23 going to a Democrat for the first time in over 100 years and CA-10 going to a more liberal candidate are great successes! Uh, wait. What did I just say?"
-- Michael Stoole

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:16 PM   

Let's just recap here. The Republicans lost a seat in upstate New York which they've held since 1850 because a number of members bolted & supported the candidate of a fringe party. And isn't Steele's job to support all Republicans? He should have been doing everything he could to prevent Palin & her ilk from supporting Hoffman.

Any Republican office-holder who isn't part of this right-wing clique now knows that they are on their own: they have nothing to lose by crossing over to the Democrats -- or any other party.

If I were Steele & still had average intelligence, I wouldn't be celebrating last night. The GOP just accelerated its slide into irrelevance under his watch.

Geoff

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 7:46 PM    in reply to NotaGOP

Agreed. Basically Tuesday highlighted most of the causes of the GOP's current problems, including their inability to maintain contact with reality. That being said, it's no time for Dems to gloat. Any party that can jettison Dr. Howard Dean after his 50 state strategy proved so stunningly successful in 2008 needs to exercise some fruitful soul-searching and course correction. I say more Howard Dean and less Rahm Emmanuel.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 9:55 PM    in reply to PushMe-PullYou

How many times can I co-sign this post?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:28 PM   

"I told every nominee the same thing," he said. "I'll help you win, I'll do whatever I can, but don't screw it up."

I'll just bet that's what he told Scozzafava. I'll bet he also said, 'I'll get the big boys to line up behind you. We got yer back, no matter what!"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

CN

user-pic

November 4, 2009 1:35 PM    in reply to Schmed- ley

"I told every nominee the same thing. If you win, I'll take the credit. If you lose, it was your own damn fault."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:31 PM   

Whaddamaroon

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:31 PM   

Ah Michael Steele- does he know he is just warming the RNC Chair until Palin decides she wants it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:38 PM    in reply to vincent75

That would be AWESOME!!!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:42 PM   

"The GOP renaissance has begun,"

Um, alrighty then. You lose a seat that's been Republican by turning an obscure race into a national one, your most prominent party members line up to support the "real" Republican in the race, your two governors win by appearing to be moderates, and this is a renaissance?

More like a deepening in the multiple personality disorder known as the Republican Party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 12:58 PM   

The optimal outcome for last nights returns would have been for Democrats to sweep the governorships as well as NY-23 and CA-10.

But this outcome is a very, very good second choice! The "success" in destroying a successful moderate Republican, to the advantage of Democrats, combined with the real successes of the two governorship races (achieved by running away from the wingnuts, shunning Palin, and downplaying party affiliation) have created the newly minted dogma that this *proves* that purging all moderates in the Republican party is the royal road back to power.

Once the Republican Party becomes the wholly owned organ of the White Evangelical Christian Party it is finished as a national party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:00 PM    in reply to CareyInLA

Do you ever consider how fortunate Dems are in this situation? And that not having a credible opposition probably makes them worse Dems, as a result?

I do.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:47 PM    in reply to CT Voter

I do too. It may be good for the Dems, but not for us.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:50 PM    in reply to CT Voter

I agree. We need at least two viable national parties. The current GOP would be considered a fringe racist group in Europe.

I'd love to see a true libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, reality-based party. Depending upon their environmental stance, I might actually vote for them. At the very least, they could challenge the Democrats and make our government better.

Unfortunately, I don't see how such a group could arise from the ashes of the GOP.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 2:30 PM    in reply to Minne sconsin

Actually, speaking as an expat living in Europe, the Europeans already consider the GOP to be a fringe racist group.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 2:11 PM    in reply to CT Voter

It's also an opportunity to move the party to the left. Republicans, in order to survive, will have to move to the center; otherwise the party will be marginalized out of existence. That will enable the Dems to move leftward by primary-ing out Blue Dogs and other Republican enablers (of course this won't work in red states, but there's no reason for deep blue states, like California, to have a center-right senator like DiFi).

Ideally we'd end up with a center-left Democratic Party and a center-right Republican Party, and let people decide which philosophy they think works better. Right now, we have a Democratic Party that is mostly centrist, with a few center-right Blue Dogs, and no real left wing, and a Republican Party that continues to drift towards the lunatic right fringe, with only a few center-right moderates.

At any rate, as long as the GOP wants to continue casting their lot with the Glen Beck crazies, there's not much we can do about it, other than to try and get better Democrats elected.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 1:58 PM   

Word.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 2:42 PM   

Does that mean the Repigs have started burning witches or seeing if they manage to float with more chain than they can swim with?

Is Torture included in this Renaissance?

Inquiring minds would like to know.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 3:05 PM   

GOP and Renaissance in the same sentence.

yeah, right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 7:36 PM   

Why do I get the image of Steel as the little girl in the old Shake n Bake commercial who chimes in at the end with "and I helped".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 5, 2009 6:44 AM    in reply to MonkeyBoy

What a terrible thing to say about a little girl, but that is exactly right.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 7:51 PM   

Beck, Palin and Bachmann, otherwise known as Lying, and Cougars, and Bareass crazy. Interesting to watch as they split the party into the Republicans, who are wealthy and care only about preserving their wealth, and the Rapture Party, who represent a white, fundamentalist Taliban theocracy. At that point I can't imagine either of the remainders very capable of offering a credible opposition candidate on the national level.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 4, 2009 10:21 PM   

Hey, now, Mike's right! Y'all know what renaissance means, right? It's French for "rebirth". And this IS the rebirth of the Republican Party. Thing is, birthing is kinda painful, and doesn't always turn out the way you hoped . . .

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 5, 2009 6:42 AM    in reply to Bob in AZ

"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 5, 2009 8:25 AM   

Steele is an observer, not a participant.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on