RNC chair Michael Steele bounded up to the podium at his post-election press conference at Republican Party HQ in Washington this morning.
"How's everyone feeling?" he said with a big grin. When the two dozen or so bleary eyed reporters in the audience failed to respond to the question, his grin grew even larger. "That good, huh?"
For the next 30 minutes, Steele raved on about his party's victories last night -- and on his role in making them happen.
"The GOP renaissance has begun," he said, before borrowing a line from President Obama's campaign last year. "This election was not about 'the change we need.' It's about the change the American people want."
As he has in numerous TV interviews last night and this morning, Steele said that the GOP's big wins in Virginia and New Jersey indicated that the party has come back from a string of losses that he said left many observers questioning whether Republicans had a future as a national party in America. He again said the party's defeat in the hotly contested NY-23 congressional race was more about a "flawed process" in the way the local party selected nominees, rather than "a battle for the soul of the party" that activists on the left and the right made it out to be.
"I'm not concerned about that," he said to questions about the ideological takeaways from NY-23. "I'm more concerned about a Democratic party that has a 60-seat majority in the Senate and can't pass a health care bill."
But Steele did focus on one topic he's largely ignored in the initial coverage of last night's races: his own tenure as chairman. Fraught with turmoil, gaffes and public calls for his resignation from party leaders early on, Steele's time leading the GOP has been dramatic to say the least. He suggested last night's win means all that is behind him.
"It's not about credit," he said when asked how responsible he was for the wins. "It's about sharing credit with the winners...and giving credit to the volunteers and party activists that made this happen."
Steele reeled off a list of numbers that suggested credit to the RNC was not exactly the furthest thing from his mind, however. He said the RNC spent around $13 million in both New Jersey and Virginia, and claimed to have ramped up the party's grassroots operation -- as he promised he would when he took over the RNC last November.
"Our volunteers contacted 5.8 million voters during the course of this campaign," he said. "That's three times the number we reached in 2008."
"I'm in the business of winning," he added. "My responsibility was to move us out of the ash heap of losses."
Steele scoffed at critics of his fundraising prowess. "I laugh at people who don't think it's a big deal that I'm only $1.3 million behind the Democrats in fundraising," he said. "They've got the presidency and both houses of Congress and I'm only $1.3 million behind? I mean, come on."
The chair said he learned "a lot of lessons" from the race to help make things go even better for Republicans next time around. He also gave some insight into how he motivated his candidates to victory this year.
"I told every nominee the same thing," he said. "I'll help you win, I'll do whatever I can, but don't screw it up."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

VivaAmerica!
November 4, 2009 11:15 AM
Shorter Steele: I get to keep my job.
congratulations Mike! I'd hate to see a brother out of work.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LuxVeritas
November 4, 2009 11:18 AM
Ahh, I can't wait until we kick their asses in 2010.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Middle Road
November 4, 2009 1:18 PM in reply to LuxVeritas
I think that may be harder to do if a weak-ass Health care bill is passed :)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
November 4, 2009 11:20 AM
more like a medieval revival, The Endarkenment, to use a word from the good poet Jeffrey McDaniels.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
November 4, 2009 11:24 AM
LOL, what a moron. i mean, think about that statement.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
VivaAmerica!
November 4, 2009 11:36 AM in reply to nova voter
lol! people don't want what's good for them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lalo35adm
November 4, 2009 11:49 AM in reply to VivaAmerica!
maybe people simply don't what what "you" think is good for them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
A Missouri voter
November 4, 2009 11:56 AM in reply to Lalo35adm
Given that it was Michael Steele, not VivaAmerica, making the statement, it would appear that what is intended is that the people simply don't what what Michael Steele thinks is good for them.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Marioth
November 4, 2009 1:09 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
The ancient company IBM made its name in the 20th century by going in and selling customers what they needed, not what they wanted. They then set about crafting the best solution to meet that need, and data centers everywhere filled up with IBM computers, helping to pave the way to the ready information access we have today.
Government by "wants" leads to most of the messes we have now. We do not need 400:1 CEO:Worker compensation imbalance. We do not need insurance companies that throw people out of coverage. We do not need banks that are too big to fail taking handouts AND THEN turning around and raising interest rates.
Hell, I want a lot of things, but what are my REAL needs? This is what govt. must satisfy. What you want is part of the liberty equation, and thus a personal responsibility.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
November 4, 2009 1:54 PM in reply to Marioth
Lalo wants the wizard to give him a brain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
runfastandwin
November 4, 2009 8:24 PM in reply to nova voter
It makes no sense. I guess it sounds good to the common Republican voter though.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
November 4, 2009 11:33 AM
Well, good to see they're still delusional and incapable of drawing correct inferences from objective data. Thank God. There's still hope for us in 2010, after all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
matyra
November 4, 2009 11:48 AM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
What do you mean? They are being totally rational here. By 'flawed process', I'm sure that Steele is acknowledging the schism that went on there in the GOP and that they are going to acknowledge the problem, go through the painful process of finding solutions, and kick the crazies to the curb.
lol, yeah, right.... ;)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Lalo35adm
November 4, 2009 11:50 AM in reply to matyra
flawed process is that GOP candidate was appointed by party establishment without any kind of primary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
November 4, 2009 12:04 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
Which is to say they found a candidate that might have actually won rather than an ideologically pure, but unelectable candidate. Some flaw. I hope they continue to correct such flaws all over the country next election cycle.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
November 4, 2009 12:12 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
So if they had chosen a right wing loon through the primary process and HE had lost, that would've been better?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AJM
November 4, 2009 12:50 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
You mean Hoffman decided not to run in a primary? and to pull a Lieberman instead?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
An Outhouse
November 4, 2009 1:06 PM in reply to Lalo35adm
or a flawed process where an out of town Dick Army with a wad of cash barges in and tries to force a nut job on the local populace ?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
A Missouri voter
November 4, 2009 11:53 AM
What do you know. I actually agree with Mr. Steele on this point. I am also more concerned about Senate Democrats than about the NY-23rd. Of course, Steele's concern and my own have different characters (he is interested in preventing them from passing a bill, I am interested in seeing them get past the obstacles to successful passage), but if Mr. Steele thinks that Health Insurance reform is more important than the results of NY-23, I can at least agree with him on that much.
Er, o.k., if you say so. If two victories are enough, in your own estimation, to move you out of the "ash heap" then I am happy for you. From where I am standing, however, I think that Ramesh Ponnuru got it right last night when he said "It's... the Republicans' best election night since 2004. Of course that's a low bar."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LFC
November 4, 2009 11:59 AM
"My responsibility was to move us out of the ash heap of losses."
"That's why NY-23 going to a Democrat for the first time in over 100 years and CA-10 going to a more liberal candidate are great successes! Uh, wait. What did I just say?"
-- Michael Stoole
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
NotaGOP
November 4, 2009 12:16 PM
Let's just recap here. The Republicans lost a seat in upstate New York which they've held since 1850 because a number of members bolted & supported the candidate of a fringe party. And isn't Steele's job to support all Republicans? He should have been doing everything he could to prevent Palin & her ilk from supporting Hoffman.
Any Republican office-holder who isn't part of this right-wing clique now knows that they are on their own: they have nothing to lose by crossing over to the Democrats -- or any other party.
If I were Steele & still had average intelligence, I wouldn't be celebrating last night. The GOP just accelerated its slide into irrelevance under his watch.
Geoff
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
PushMe-PullYou
November 4, 2009 7:46 PM in reply to NotaGOP
Agreed. Basically Tuesday highlighted most of the causes of the GOP's current problems, including their inability to maintain contact with reality. That being said, it's no time for Dems to gloat. Any party that can jettison Dr. Howard Dean after his 50 state strategy proved so stunningly successful in 2008 needs to exercise some fruitful soul-searching and course correction. I say more Howard Dean and less Rahm Emmanuel.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
gharlane
November 4, 2009 9:55 PM in reply to PushMe-PullYou
How many times can I co-sign this post?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed- ley
November 4, 2009 12:28 PM
I'll just bet that's what he told Scozzafava. I'll bet he also said, 'I'll get the big boys to line up behind you. We got yer back, no matter what!"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CN
November 4, 2009 1:35 PM in reply to Schmed- ley
"I told every nominee the same thing. If you win, I'll take the credit. If you lose, it was your own damn fault."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jorge
November 4, 2009 12:31 PM
Whaddamaroon
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
vincent75
November 4, 2009 12:31 PM
Ah Michael Steele- does he know he is just warming the RNC Chair until Palin decides she wants it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
November 4, 2009 12:38 PM in reply to vincent75
That would be AWESOME!!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
November 4, 2009 12:42 PM
"The GOP renaissance has begun,"
Um, alrighty then. You lose a seat that's been Republican by turning an obscure race into a national one, your most prominent party members line up to support the "real" Republican in the race, your two governors win by appearing to be moderates, and this is a renaissance?
More like a deepening in the multiple personality disorder known as the Republican Party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CareyInLA
November 4, 2009 12:58 PM
The optimal outcome for last nights returns would have been for Democrats to sweep the governorships as well as NY-23 and CA-10.
But this outcome is a very, very good second choice! The "success" in destroying a successful moderate Republican, to the advantage of Democrats, combined with the real successes of the two governorship races (achieved by running away from the wingnuts, shunning Palin, and downplaying party affiliation) have created the newly minted dogma that this *proves* that purging all moderates in the Republican party is the royal road back to power.
Once the Republican Party becomes the wholly owned organ of the White Evangelical Christian Party it is finished as a national party.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CT Voter
November 4, 2009 1:00 PM in reply to CareyInLA
Do you ever consider how fortunate Dems are in this situation? And that not having a credible opposition probably makes them worse Dems, as a result?
I do.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Middle Road
November 4, 2009 1:47 PM in reply to CT Voter
I do too. It may be good for the Dems, but not for us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Minne sconsin
November 4, 2009 1:50 PM in reply to CT Voter
I agree. We need at least two viable national parties. The current GOP would be considered a fringe racist group in Europe.
I'd love to see a true libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, reality-based party. Depending upon their environmental stance, I might actually vote for them. At the very least, they could challenge the Democrats and make our government better.
Unfortunately, I don't see how such a group could arise from the ashes of the GOP.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbe1
November 4, 2009 2:30 PM in reply to Minne sconsin
Actually, speaking as an expat living in Europe, the Europeans already consider the GOP to be a fringe racist group.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
commie atheist
November 4, 2009 2:11 PM in reply to CT Voter
It's also an opportunity to move the party to the left. Republicans, in order to survive, will have to move to the center; otherwise the party will be marginalized out of existence. That will enable the Dems to move leftward by primary-ing out Blue Dogs and other Republican enablers (of course this won't work in red states, but there's no reason for deep blue states, like California, to have a center-right senator like DiFi).
Ideally we'd end up with a center-left Democratic Party and a center-right Republican Party, and let people decide which philosophy they think works better. Right now, we have a Democratic Party that is mostly centrist, with a few center-right Blue Dogs, and no real left wing, and a Republican Party that continues to drift towards the lunatic right fringe, with only a few center-right moderates.
At any rate, as long as the GOP wants to continue casting their lot with the Glen Beck crazies, there's not much we can do about it, other than to try and get better Democrats elected.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rbe1
November 4, 2009 1:58 PM
Word.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
raiatean
November 4, 2009 2:42 PM
Does that mean the Repigs have started burning witches or seeing if they manage to float with more chain than they can swim with?
Is Torture included in this Renaissance?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hidden Oak
November 4, 2009 3:05 PM
GOP and Renaissance in the same sentence.
yeah, right.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MonkeyBoy
November 4, 2009 7:36 PM
Why do I get the image of Steel as the little girl in the old Shake n Bake commercial who chimes in at the end with "and I helped".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wake up
November 5, 2009 6:44 AM in reply to MonkeyBoy
What a terrible thing to say about a little girl, but that is exactly right.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mr.E.
November 4, 2009 7:51 PM
Beck, Palin and Bachmann, otherwise known as Lying, and Cougars, and Bareass crazy. Interesting to watch as they split the party into the Republicans, who are wealthy and care only about preserving their wealth, and the Rapture Party, who represent a white, fundamentalist Taliban theocracy. At that point I can't imagine either of the remainders very capable of offering a credible opposition candidate on the national level.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bob in AZ
November 4, 2009 10:21 PM
Hey, now, Mike's right! Y'all know what renaissance means, right? It's French for "rebirth". And this IS the rebirth of the Republican Party. Thing is, birthing is kinda painful, and doesn't always turn out the way you hoped . . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
wake up
November 5, 2009 6:42 AM in reply to Bob in AZ
"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
stevelaudig
November 5, 2009 8:25 AM
Steele is an observer, not a participant.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?