TPMDC

Tea Party Group Cancels Plan To Burn Perriello And Pelosi In Effigy

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Rep. Tom Perriello (D-VA)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The plan by the Danville TEA Party Patriots to burn Rep. Tom Perriello (D-VA) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi in effigy -- a sort of Tea-Party Burning Man -- has been called off, Greg Sargent reports:

"We will not be going forward with the plan," a crestfallen Coleman told me by phone moments ago. "We had to cancel it. The property owner won't allow us to do it. The media attention was something that he didn't want."

Coleman said he was upset that people had gotten the wrong idea about his plan. "I'm disappointed that the story got out of hand and people misinterpreted something we thought would be a little historical lesson. They made people believe that we were committing an act of violence," he said, adding that the "they" in question were the "liberal blogs."

Comments (31) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 16, 2009 4:01 PM   

Darn. Now fox will have to figure out how to fill air time. This would have been a huge story for them. They could have spliced pictures of the anti-war protests to make it look like a huge crowd and riled up the lunatic fringe. It would definitely have been entertaining.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 5:03 PM    in reply to Michael A

This is a sad day for all Freedom Fighting Americans. If we can't burn Dems in effigy maybe we can leave them bobbing up and down in the Boston Harbor.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

CN

user-pic

November 16, 2009 4:05 PM   

Let me get this straight:

The teabaggers just wanted a private gathering -- no media, no attention -- of fellow nutcases in which they would burn something to reinforce a "historical lesson."

Does this remind anyone else of a certain type of gathering in which the participants wear white hoods?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 5:07 PM    in reply to CN

No absolutely not. There is no correlation whatsoever. What we are talking about here is Freedom Fighters, people who believe their rights are being taken away and that states should have more power to choose what laws will govern them.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 6:16 PM    in reply to Chris

In other words, yes. They're protesting laws they personally don't like, just as the KKK protested civil rights laws being enacted because they believed it would destroy the "white race." And they're carrying signs saying "I'm not armed THIS TIME" just as the KKK burned crosses on people's lawns.

Just because someone believes something, it doesn't make it true. The teabaggers can believe they're freedom fighters, but that's a belief, not a fact.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 21, 2009 3:34 PM    in reply to Chris

There is absolutely EVERY correlation.

The well known code phrase "Take back my (or "our") country," has been White Supremacist code since the days of greatest KKK power.

What we are talking about here (and in EVERY anti-Obama sentiment blaming him personally fro policy or the loss of Republican political popularity and power,) is old-fashioned right wing paranoid racist hatemongering, pure and simple.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:18 PM   

Just goes to show how hateful those darned liberal blogs are. Imagine misconstruing a burning in effigy as in any way threatening or intended to provoke violence. They just wanted to invoke the memory of our dear Revolutionary forefathers and the way they burned British officials and local Tories in effigy. Heaven knows, no actual harm ever came to to any of them. Aside from the occaisional tar and feathering, hanging, house burning, or shooting by unrelated misguided individuals.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:23 PM   

I thought good Americans HUNG people in effigy. This whole burning thing tastes of Popery, does it not?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EH

user-pic

November 16, 2009 4:40 PM    in reply to Powkat

props for "popery!" this reminds me more of the middle east, though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:26 PM   

Imagine that anyone would think that burning two people in effigy would be considered violent? It must be terrible to be so misunderstood. Historical lesson? I really wonder if this guy has ever read a history book!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:28 PM   

Coleman said he was upset that people had gotten the wrong idea about his plan.

A simulated act of extreme violence? What would be the 'right' idea about that plan?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:32 PM    in reply to chimpale

That they, just like the founders, were protesting a foreign colonial government's policy of taxation without representation.

What?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

November 16, 2009 4:49 PM    in reply to TBender

No, what they are asking for is representation without taxation -- everybody knows that Gov'munt is a free lunch. And keep it out of my Medicare!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:30 PM   

Given that burning things in effigy is traditionally a violent enterprise, you'd think he'd stay away from the "historical" context of the thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:38 PM   

I have to wonder if some organizers believed in voodoo just enough to think this would directly harm the people the effigies were of.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 4:47 PM   

They've decided to instead rub their nuts in each others faces in protest of health care.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 5:04 PM    in reply to mike from Arlington

hahhaha good one Mike. Circle jerk all the same.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 8:00 AM    in reply to Chris

Never let a teabagger forget that their ignorance led to the first hasty naming of their weewee protest project. Call them Teabaggers ALWAYS--they called themselves that first until someone pointed out it was a nickname for getting smacked in the face with someone's testicles.

And there's always Operation Iraq Liberation, another product of the blinded-by-vanity right, if they call it a one-off mistake.

You could punk a right-winger by suggesting they join the anti-immigration organization, the Dirty Sanchez Brigade. Make up some phony business cards and hand them out at rallies. Then hand out grease pencils so people can draw their own mustache.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 5:18 PM   

What? You mean that burning lowercase T in the yard might not just stand for "trouble"? (h/t South Park)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 5:48 PM   

So according to these clowns if protesters somewhere in the world burn an effigy of the President it is violence. But if they burn an effigy of a democratically elected representative in their own country its not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 6:12 PM    in reply to RectoNoVerso

Actually, I don't think they would care about protesters burning an effigy if the current president. That's just free speech.

Now, burning the flag on the other hand...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 7:03 PM   

I get why Pelosi would have had to stay above the fray. But if I'd been Perriello, I'd have offered to donate one of my own suits for the effigy to wear. ANYTHING to draw attention to it.

You know... "You sent me to Washington to fight for [insert issue here], and they burned me in effigy. I must be doing something right!" Hell, if he couldn't get re-elected on that line alone, WE should burn him in effigy!

I think the TP crowd must have realized that they'd only be helping him. Or was this one special spot of "property" the only place in the world that an effigy would burn properly?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 7:05 PM   

Since Fox got caught spicing bogus news clips together maybe they were worried that the other networks would spice their rally with say a KKK cross burning. All's fair in love and propaganda. I miss the old days before Fox Spews.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 9:04 PM   

Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Happiness
Andrew Sullivan - Provincetown, Massachusetts
As heard on NPR’s Morning Edition, July 4, 2005

I believe in life. I believe in treasuring it as a mystery that will never be fully understood, as a sanctity that should never be destroyed, as an invitation to experience now what can only be remembered tomorrow. I believe in its indivisibility, in the intimate connection between the newest bud of spring and the flicker in the eye of a patient near death, between the athlete in his prime and the quadriplegic vet, between the fetus in the womb and the mother who bears another life in her own body.

I believe in liberty. I believe that within every soul lies the capacity to reach for its own good, that within every physical body there endures an unalienable right to be free from coercion. I believe in a system of government that places that liberty at the center of its concerns, that enforces the law solely to protect that freedom, that sides with the individual against the claims of family and tribe and church and nation, that sees innocence before guilt and dignity before stigma. I believe in the right to own property, to maintain it against the benign suffocation of a government that would tax more and more of it away. I believe in freedom of speech and of contract, the right to offend and blaspheme, as well as the right to convert and bear witness. I believe that these freedoms are connected — the freedom of the fundamentalist and the atheist, the female and the male, the black and the Asian, the gay and the straight.

I believe in the pursuit of happiness. Not its attainment, nor its final definition, but its pursuit. I believe in the journey, not the arrival; in conversation, not monologues; in multiple questions rather than any single answer. I believe in the struggle to remake ourselves and challenge each other in the spirit of eternal forgiveness, in the awareness that none of us knows for sure what happiness truly is, but each of us knows the imperative to keep searching. I believe in the possibility of surprising joy, of serenity through pain, of homecoming through exile.

And I believe in a country that enshrines each of these three things, a country that promises nothing but the promise of being more fully human, and never guarantees its success. In that constant failure to arrive — implied at the very beginning — lies the possibility of a permanently fresh start, an old newness, a way of revitalizing ourselves and our civilization in ways few foresaw and one day many will forget. But the point is now. And the place is America.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 7:15 AM    in reply to Silence

Silence, I don't think you and Sully know what freedom is. No one took the teabaggers' feedom away, they just chickened out. Coleman tried to weasel out of it by putting it on the property owner, but if that is true then the property owner, who is obviously a teabagger, chickened out. But my money is on Coleman not taking responsibility for his own cowardice. In any case if they had the guts to go forward with this no one could have stopped them. Not the government, not the liberal bloggers. And I'm sure they could have found another property owner who would have let them do it.

They just chickened out, plain and simple.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 8:38 AM    in reply to Riesz Fischer

I do understand freedom and I agree that the protesters should not have "chickened out". One should never allow the enemy of freedom to set the rules of a battle.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 7:17 PM    in reply to Silence

and the "enemy of freedom" is anyone who wants people to be able to have health care, huh?
oh! oh! here's another enemy of freedom! -- puppies!

asshole!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 16, 2009 10:50 PM   

US Green Tech in da house...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 7:34 AM   

Burning people in effigy is such an Islamic thing to do. That's what they did to President Carter in Iran back in 1979. These rightwing conservative teabaggers have so much in common with these conservative fundamentalist Islamics - both trying to push their narrow view on everybody else -- it's really creepy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 8:47 AM    in reply to rczach

You know nothing about those who attend the TEA parties or the rich history of this country. Sad.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 7:19 PM    in reply to Silence

as opposed to you, who knows nothing about anything. now, talk about sad....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on