TPMDC is thankful today for political books that aren't boring or retread, and David Plouffe's "The Audacity to Win" fits into that category.
Plouffe ran the Obama campaign in 2008 and still does work for the DNC's campaign arm Organizing for America. He dishes in his book on some of the campaign's best-kept secrets.
We've reported on a few since the book came out - the Obama camp leaked the John Edwards haircut, they pushed for an early state campaign pledge to "box in" Hillary Clinton and Edwards offered to endorse for a spot on the ticket.
But there's so much more.
I covered the entire long campaign, and it was fascinating to read a candid book and peek under the hood at what had been a famously tight-lipped shop.
There are plenty of examples of Plouffe being cheap, and a few mentions of Plouffe and Robert Gibbs in their boxers.
After the jump, TPMDC's Top 10 things that Plouffe reveals in "Audacity to Win."
* Shouting match:
At one point of high stress, Plouffe and David Axelrod "got into a heated shouting match" on a daily conference call. (Plouffe did many early-morning calls from his bathroom so he didn't wake his family.)
"For the first time, we blew up at each other," he wrote. F-bombs were involved. Jim Messina, now a deputy White House chief of staff, told Plouffe the fight was "horrible."
"It was like watching your parents have a screaming match at the dinner table," Messina told Plouffe.
He and Axelrod apologized to each other, with Plouffe telling his longtime friend, "It was bound to happen once."
* He had planned to leave
One of the most surprising reveals in "Audacity to Win" is that Plouffe never planned to stay through the general election. His wife, who had given him a positive pregnancy test wrapped up as a present during the brutal primary in Ohio, was due two days before the election and he'd been missing her and his young son all year as the primary stretched on. (And on.)
"In early spring I told Barack that once we had sealed the nomination I would step down as campaign manager. ... I could no longer run the show in Chicago," he wrote.
Plouffe's wife had returned to Washington and essentially couch-surfed with friends and family. "I couldn't stomach not being there to help," Plouffe wrote.
"Barack was not happy with my decision ... several members of the staff expressed [to my wife] their personal alarm at the disruption it would cause ... there was no time to spare for a leadership transition."
In the end, it was Plouffe's wife who convinced him to stay, telling him "[W]e have an obligation to do everything we can to elect him in November."
* Bush called Obama
During the whole "suspend the campaign, fly back to Washington" scuffle between Sen. John McCain and Obama, the Democrat talked to then-President George W. Bush. Obama told Plouffe his conversation with Bush was "interesting."
"He doesn't seem all that thrilled about holding the meeting. Almost apologetic," Obama told Plouffe.
Obama added that Bush said, "I know what it's like to be in the middle of a presidential campaign and have something like this dumped on you ... I'm not sure why McCain thinks this is a good idea. But I have to move forward."
* LOL - Texting Went Wrong
Plouffe said the campaign had planned to text supporters in the morning their choice of Joe Biden to be Obama's running mate. But it didn't quite work out that way.
"Shortly after midnight, the Associated Press was the first to name Biden as the pick. Their story was based on one unnamed Democratic source. One. It sounded pretty thin to me. ... I was absolutely convinced they did not have it directly ... I understood the competition to be first. But I felt this was a real low moment in terms of reporting in the campaign, and I subsequently learned that some of the AP reporters were uncomfortable as well. They knew their story was shaky but their bosses said to go regardless. We started sending out texts right away. ... We felt good that it held as long as it did and that most of our supporters heard from us first."
* Bayh wasn't sure he could deliver Indiana
Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) was among the three finalists in the veepstakes, but "was modest about his ability to help deliver the state," Plouffe wrote.
"I don't know if I can help push you over the line there. I assume it won't hurt, but I couldn't in good conscience say those eleven Hoosier electoral votes will be in your column if it's Obama-Bayh," Bayh told Plouffe. (They did win it.)
* Initial battleground list was bigger
The first campaign map of hopeful states included the ultimate battlegrounds that delivered Obama the presidency, but also a few longshots.
Among those: Montana, Texas, North Dakota, South Dakota.
At the time, campaign aides mentioned those but not Texas, and at first thought Alaska was possible (before the GOP ticket was formed).
Obama told Plouffe: "I'm not really interested in spending my time dreaming up landslide scenarios. Let's just make sure we hit 270. I don't want to get 260 wishing for 360."
* Wright was wrong
When Rev. Jeremiah Wright exploded onto the scene, Plouffe, Axelrod and Gibbs pressed him on whether he knew about some of his fiery sermons.
"I don't recall any of these parts of these sermons," Obama told the group. "From time to time - and it was fairly rare - Wright would say something I thought crossed the line or was even in poor taste. I would often come up to him after and say so, and he and I would sometimes have heated disagreements. But I'm positive I never heard anything like this."
He also told them parishoners found Wright to be "more erratic over time."
Plouffe also revealed, "He had told me in the middle of the Wright episode during the Pennsylvania primary that he would end his candidacy if he honestly thought Hillary had a better chance of winning and that he really was damaged electoral goods."
* Stellar fundraising
Plouffe writes there were days when they raised up to $2 million during the general election campaign, making the team grateful they'd opted out of the public financing system.
"It was like watching a volcano erupt ... There were times when we were raising $250,000, $300,000, even $500,000 an hour. (Plouffe also thought Sarah Palin gave them a big bank account boost.)
* Attacks on taxing health care
Obama told Plouffe he didn't like the way the campaign was attacking McCain on his proposal to tax health care benefits as "the biggest middle-class tax increase in history."
"Obama was unhappy when he saw the ads and demanded less drama," Plouffe wrote. Obama told the campaign: "I don't think people will find that charge credible, and while I can make the case that it's true, I think it puts too much spin on the ball."
The irony, of course, is that taxing benefits is among the proposals being considered in the current health care debate.
* Slogan in doubt
Obama told his staffers he was "not sold" on the "Change We Can Believe In" slogan that ended up being the centerpiece of the campaign.
"Do you really think it says enough? Nothing about issues at all," Obama told Plouffe.
Plouffe says he also found it "a bit awkward and perhaps ephemeral. But it also had potential because it was a bit unusual and could reinforce our message."

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

ericf
November 27, 2009 12:23 PM
That bit about "Change we can believe in" was interesting because it struck me as weak too. I always wondered why the campaign didn't push "Yes we can!" more. That was the one that moved me in the New Hampshire concession speech which I think might be his best, and crowds at rallies chanted it on their own. It's like the advisors overlooked the bloody obvious.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
November 27, 2009 8:14 PM in reply to ericf
Now lets get back to the good old "Obama Lexicon"
(which you name callers are so comfortable with)
Yo YO Yo, Lets give a SHOUT OUT to the wanderful couple that came to my Big Party, (which no one on this blog would ever get to attend).
They where true Obama neophytes!
I can just see you Bush haters in the old folks home, waveing you cane in the air when a jet airplane fly by and yells, "That is takeing some Neo-con to Hawaii while I am setting in this rocking chair in Peeberry".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
November 28, 2009 11:03 AM in reply to inokeah
Great comment, you're really rocking with this. There was a poll when Bush left the Presidency, and lots of the historians canvassed did not think Bush was even *one* of the worst Presidents. So that somewhat strengthens your messy argument.
But 90% of the historians went the other way, and 60% thought he was dead last (see my own party affiliation). But those historians are just the kind of book-smart, formally-educated know-it-alls that you, Joe the Plumber, and Glenn Beck snigger at.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Decider
November 30, 2009 1:54 PM in reply to ericf
The only change you can believe in for Washington is no change, so I guess the slogan was accurate. I called the Prez to thank him for not investigating any of my torture, wiretapping or DOJ attorney programs. Also, glad to see that he is fine with no public option on healthcare and that he has escalated in Afghan. I can't believe I was EVER worried that they might even investigate manufacturing evidence to invade Iraq. Ha!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
November 27, 2009 12:43 PM
I remember how disgusted I was about the $400 haircut bullshit. And the Pukes really lapped it up.
We are all Republicans now.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SchrodingersCat
November 27, 2009 2:44 PM in reply to Riesz Fischer
Shitty thing to do, I agree; however, with everything that's come out about Edwards since, I'm thankful.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
November 28, 2009 11:04 AM in reply to Riesz Fischer
Speak for yourself.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Bruce Webb
November 29, 2009 10:47 AM in reply to Overreach THIS!
That's too funny!
It is a blog comment thread and you think "Speak for yourself!" is cutting wit? What the f' else are we doing but speaking for ourselves? Do you see a 'Bruce plus 165,000,001 Americans' signature? Talk about overreach, how about self parody.
_______________
I didn't care about the $400 haircut at the time. Rich people spend that much money on a tie or a couple of bottles of champagne. That was before I knew Edwards charged it to the campaign. Clearly the guy believed normal strictures didn't apply to him, that you could have an affair and still run for high office, that you could take small dollar donations that people thought they were giving to the 'son of a mill worker' and blow them on haircuts that would cover half of a lot of working peoples' rent.
Plus the discovery that Edwards was whoring himself as VP to both campaigns shows that in the end he had no core principles at all. Screw him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
brewmn61
November 29, 2009 2:27 PM in reply to Bruce Webb
OT was objecting to the assholish comment that "we are all Republicans now," so what's the point of this assholish comment of yours?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
November 29, 2009 7:56 PM in reply to brewmn61
Thanks Brewmn61, and put another way, (speaking only for me) the $400 haircut leak may have been dirty pool, I can't judge it as I know politics is sometimes a dirty business.
But taking that, and leaping over to say, "We're all Republicans now" is simply inadmissible, and that's what Brewmn61 and I wish for Riesz Fishcher and Bruce Webb to be mindful of.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
garp
November 30, 2009 11:37 AM in reply to Overreach THIS!
He is speaking for himself. But I'll second it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
November 30, 2009 4:37 PM in reply to garp
Alright. Well, the position you are advancing is that specifically because Obama's people may have intentionally leaked the $400 haircut story on Edwards, "We are all Republicans now."
So without cowardly "irony" or imbecilic "humor," why don't you tell us now in plain words why you regard that non-sequitur as true. This is your turn. Shoot.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
November 27, 2009 12:46 PM
"In the end, it was Plouffe's wife who convinced him to stay, telling him "[W]e have an obligation to do everything we can to elect him in November."
Sounds like a great Lifetime Channel story. GIves me goosebumps.
Thank YOU Mrs. Plouffe!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rootman
November 27, 2009 1:16 PM
In retrospect, I don't think the $400 haircut thing was a non-issue.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Steve Garrett
November 30, 2009 5:36 PM in reply to Rootman
I don't either. It showed he was highly narcissistic and self centered.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
November 27, 2009 1:25 PM
The Bayh bit surprises me as I would have expected him to say whatever was necessary to get the spot. Maybe he didn't think candidate Obama would win.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
November 27, 2009 1:49 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
I was very surprised by that one as well. Also, you may be right on why he said it. I'm just glad that he's not the vp. He would have sucked. Biden is awesome for a vp. Obama couldn't have picked a better vp.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theone718
November 27, 2009 9:56 PM in reply to Michael A
Difference between politics in public and honesty in private. They are friends, why shit on your friend like that?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Asinistra
November 30, 2009 9:59 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
I found the Bayh thing most interesting too as it reveals a key part of his character going forward to the health care debate and beyond. It doesn't sound to me that his reluctance to take the Veep spot was the result of his modesty, as Plouffe charitably claims, but the result of what someone once called "fire in the belly." He is like too many Dems of the Clinton generation almost totally lacking in idealism, passion, and plain and simple guts. And our fate is in their delicate hands.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
inokeah
November 27, 2009 1:26 PM
The Audacity of Party Crashing,
The Audacity of Killing Soldiers in cold blood,
This is what we have today in America.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tonigo
November 27, 2009 2:09 PM in reply to inokeah
Yeah, it was sooo much better from 2001-2008. Not a care in the world back then. No soliders dying unnecessary due to made up weapons of mass destruction, competent government action on Katrina, paying close attention to intellgence briefings warning of Al Qaeda attacks.
Yeah, that was an administration we could believe in all right.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mJJ
November 27, 2009 7:54 PM in reply to tonigo
You forgot the rip off of our treasury for the costs of those two wars and particularly, the silly expense of the Iraq war when they had nothing to do with 9-11. In fact all the loot spent in Iraq probably has much more to do with GW's need to TRY to outdo his daddy than it does in any factual need for us to go to Iraq. The guy is actually responsible for spending us into oblivion. Of course, the poor person who came after GW gets to try to undo the big mess GW foisted off onto our country but it is a mountainous undertaking. The problem is that it is not just the debt, but it is the total breakdown of moral governance under Bush. Strangely, my own party has the notion that electing GW twice was the answer to our mess but alas, things only got completely out of control.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
de TOQUEville
November 27, 2009 2:17 PM in reply to inokeah
Ban this troll idiot. He doesn't want to debate honestly, he is just trolling.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
labradog
November 27, 2009 3:21 PM in reply to inokeah
Cheney killed more soldiers in his sleep than Obama ever thought about.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
November 28, 2009 11:06 AM in reply to labradog
Elaborate, please. Your point may seem obvious to you, but actually it isn't remotely.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
StarShineSpeaks
November 27, 2009 3:21 PM
Great breakdown of the top 10 and I still want to read the book. I bet they knew more about Edwards than the $400 haircut since there were rumblings for months among the press about his girlfriend. I'm surprised he didn't come clean about that.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
comeinpbrstreetgang
November 28, 2009 8:39 AM
Enough with the Plouffe pimping..sheesh!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
theod
November 28, 2009 4:55 PM
I submit that the power of the $400 haircut story was that the mega-rich Edwards imperiously charged it to the campaign, not to his own credit card. Nobody really cares how somebody might spend his own money. And subsequently we learn how the campaign paid for his extracurricular dalliances, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Swift63
November 28, 2009 5:13 PM
The event I'm still curious about was the publication of the picture of Obama in African costume. I t was on page one of the Drudge Report, and it blamed Hillary's people. Hillary vehemently denied it. I always heard it was Plouffe, getting rid of a possibly damaging picture while blaming the opponent for it. A. You obviously can't take Drudge's word, and B. Plouffe's admission about Edwards -- thank God they didn't take him for Veep -- makes it more possible. I mean, it's possible that Hillary's campaign did the leaking, but would they have leaked it to Drudge and left a return address? Were they that stupid? At any rate, it seemed like so much else in that campaign, everything made Obama look better and his opposition stupider.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluestatedon
November 29, 2009 8:26 PM
Too bad the "Audacity to Win" wasn't followed by the "Courage to Lead."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lexalexander
November 30, 2009 10:21 AM in reply to bluestatedon
bluestate wins.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lexalexander
November 30, 2009 10:22 AM in reply to bluestatedon
correction: bluestatedon wins
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
AmericanDad
November 30, 2009 10:20 AM
Thanks for the warning. If these are the "top 10" revelations, the book must be horribly boring. Not one of these "top 10" items was more than of passing interest.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?