TPMDC

Trippi Disputes Plouffe's Claim About Edwards Offer To Trade Endorsement For Joint Ticket

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Fmr. Howard Dean Campaign Manager Joe Trippi

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Former John Edwards adviser Joe Trippi is pushing back against David Plouffe's claim that the Edwards camp tried to strike deals on the vice presidency during the 2008 Democratic primary.

As we reported last night, Plouffe charges in his new book "The Audacity to Win" that a "senior Edwards adviser" suggested Edwards would drop out and that he and Obama could team up as a joint ticket.

Trippi told the Washington Post's Greg Sargent he wasn't aware of the pitch. He also suggested Edwards, who was later mired by scandal due to an affair, was more interested in being attorney general than the No. 2 slot.

Sargent reports:

"Edwards was pretty clear to me that VP didn't appeal to him and that he was more interested and thought he could do more as AG," Trippi emailed.

Trippi also contested the assertion that the Edwards camp thought Hillary would win South Carolina and go on to victory, arguing that "it was clear that Obama was going to crush everyone in South Carolina and then run a series of victories."

Plouffe isn't completely clear on whether Edwards himself was behind the alleged offer of a deal. So it's always possible that another top Edwards adviser -- Jonathan Prince, for instance -- made some kind of suggestion along these lines.

Late update: Mystery solved. Sargent talked to an Edwards adviser who says Plouffe's account is "entirely accurate."

Comments (7) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

November 17, 2009 1:08 PM   

IT's true. you're new.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 1:12 PM   

Well, I used to like trippi. This sounds like bs to me. Of course he wanted vp. It was patently obvious that was what he was pitching for. He pitched clinton and he pitched obama. I remember the meetings at the time. BS.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 1:19 PM   

Who cares?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 1:28 PM   

Well, I'd definitely believe the Edwards camp more than the Obama camp. I mean, the Edwards team was sooooo transparent about everything that was going on behind the scenes. Except for the affair. And the probable love child. And the Ensign-like adultery hush money. Other than that, what's not to believe?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 3:08 PM   

No trial lawyer who's been through hundreds of mediated settlment conferences is going to open the bidding with the real price. What's surprising to me is the Plouffle is being so seemingly obtuse about what Edwards was really after.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 3:36 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Does it matter what he was really after?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 17, 2009 4:01 PM    in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve

Not so much. According to the Edwards aide who made the offer, Plouffe has told the story correctly. Trippi was out of the loop.

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/campaigns/plouffe-was-right-edwards-camp-did-offer-secret-veep-deal-adviser-confirms/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on