
Taking a step back, let's evaluate what the release of 1,615 visitors to the White House show us.
* First, it's a busy White House.
President Obama has often been accused of doing too much, and it's clear from the frequency the gates open that his team has dozens of balls up in the air at once.
From health care summits, education strategy talks with state and big-city officials in the Oval Office and meetings with industry leaders to press interviews, poetry readings and the luau for members of Congress, by all accounts there is never a dull moment at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
* The logs show that Obama and his aides met with unlikely partners such as Brent Scowcroft and the Chamber of Commerce and friends like labor leaders and Eli Pariser from MoveOn.org, consulting with them on all sorts of policy during Obama's first few months in office.
Obama huddled with Colin Powell on Afghanistan and consulted with Republicans on education and stimulus funding.
Chevron CEO David O'Reilly was among the visitors, and FCC Chairman Jules Genachowski huddled with top presidential aides before and after he was nominated for the post.
* As far as we can tell, there isn't anything scandalous going on, but it's also a political White House.
Candidates and politicians such as Newark Mayor Cory Booker and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand have met with the president's political advisers. Pollsters Joel Benenson and Stan Greenberg, too.
We also learned that the White House holds regular calls and sometimes meetings with Democratic-leaning pundits to share their talking points.
Certainly not groundbreaking given the political aides who ran the Bush White House, but worth keeping an eye on.
* It's not the full picture of what's happening in the West Wing.
As reader MD noted in an email to us, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's name doesn't appear on the list once. That's because this list isn't comprehensive. The new policy - a compromise struck after watchdog groups sued for the release of the logs - will truly be on display at the end of the year.
That's when the full list of every single visitor - not just those requested in queries from interest groups or the press - will be posted each month for the world to see.
Norm Eisen, special counsel to Obama on ethics, explains the policy and why the list doesn't include everyone in a blog post.
Watchdog groups have said they will keep a careful eye trained on the limited exceptions clause the White House carves out for national security. It also applies to sensitive meetings, such as potential Supreme Court nominees. Presidential aides haven't defined who will be the arbiter of the data.
* Finally, the White House should get credit for detailing these names - they are the first administration ever to do so.
Read through the data yourself here.
Eric Jaffa
November 25, 2009 4:51 PM
Saying they will exclude potential Supreme Court nominees from the list because they don't want us to know their names, means they will leave out whatever names they feel like.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Walter Mitty
November 25, 2009 5:21 PM
Why not just visit folks who they want to keep secret somewhere other than the White House?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bogglesthemind
November 25, 2009 6:08 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
Are you suggesting subterfuge?
Why would our employees want to do that?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Docb
November 26, 2009 3:19 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
The people who visit the White House are much less important than those that buy the Reps/Senators in Congress...Where are congressional logs?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
November 27, 2009 11:04 AM in reply to Walter Mitty
Right. Because nothing says "discreet" like a Secret Service motorcade.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
baba durag
November 25, 2009 5:54 PM
"Saying they will exclude potential Supreme Court nominees from the list because they don't want us to know their names, means they will leave out whatever names they feel like."
paranoia: the ascribing of evil intent to another.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
atticus1104
November 25, 2009 8:45 PM
Is it me, or did Stuart Varney, while debating health care reform with Congressman Weiner, just accuse American doctors of health insurance fraud in this video?
http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=3377
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
spiteface
November 26, 2009 8:59 AM
Entries in the visitor log that match names of lobbyists in the OpenSecrets.org database (w/ number of visits):
AGRAST, MARK 2
AKHTER, MOHAMMAD 1
AYRES, MERRIBEL 1
BAER, MARA 4
BARNETT, ELIZABETH 1
BECKER, FRED R. 2
BEGANS, PETER 3
BURNETT, LAIRD D. 1
CALCAGNO, ALEXANDRA B. 1
CASTELLANI, JOHN 4
CASTELLANI, JOHN J. 3
CHILDRESS, KATHERINE 1
CHILDRESS, MARK 1
CICCONE, STEPHEN 1
CLARK, ROBERT 8
COHEN, STEVEN 5
CORRIGAN, KATIE 5
DALEY, RICHARD 1
DAVIS, RICHARD 2
DEEM, RICHARD A. 1
DOLAN, MICHAEL 1
DONOHUE, THOMAS 4
DONOHUE, THOMAS J. 7
DOWLING, MICHAEL J. 1
EBELER, JACK C. 1
EDWARDS, JOHN 2
ELMENDORF, STEVE 4
ELMENDORF, STEVEN 1
FISHMAN, LINDA E. 1
FOX, ALISSA 6
FRIEDMAN, DAVID 6
GHAZAL, MARIA 1
GOLDMAN, LEE 1
GOMEZ, GABRIELLA 3
GOODFRIEND, DAVID R. 1
GRAHAM, MICHAEL 2
GRAHAM, WILLIAM 2
GUTMAN, HOWARD W. 7
HALTMEYER, KRIS 6
HANEY, CYNTHIA L. 1
HARDEN, KRYSTA 3
HARRIS, ROBERT 7
HARRIS, ROBERT L. 1
HOGANSON, JONATHAN 1
IGNAGNI, KAREN 2
JOHNSON, JAMES 10
JOHNSON, JAMES W. 1
JONES, ARANTHAN 1
KATZ, ALLAN 2
KEENAN, NANCY 3
KENNEDY, BRIAN 3
KIES, KENNETH 1
LeaMond, Nancy 1
LEVY, JONATHAN 2
LIPSEN, LINDA 2
LOWENSTEIN, DOUGLAS 2
MANATT, DANIEL C. 2
MCDERMOTT, PATRICE 1
MCDONALD, ROBERT 1
Mica, Daniel 1
MICA, DANIEL A. 3
MILLER, EDWARD 1
MILLER, GEORGE 3
MOORE, MICHAEL 1
NAWAR, MICHELLE 1
NICHOLS, ROBERT S. 3
NICKELS, THOMAS 1
PALMIERI, JENNIFER 1
PERRELLI, THOMAS J. 28
PODESTA, ANTHONY 1
PODESTA, JOHN 6
POLLACK, RICHARD 1
RIOS, ELENA 1
ROBERTSON, LINDA 5
ROBERTSON, LINDA L. 1
ROGERS, JOHN 13
Rosen, Edward 1
ROSEN, HILARY B. 3
ROSENTHAL, STEVEN S. 2
ROTHER, JOHN 2
RYAN, PAUL 2
RYE, ANGELA 1
SCHNEIDER, ANDY 1
SEROTA, SCOTT 1
SLOANE, DAVID 1
SMITH, PAUL 3
SMITH, THOMAS 1
SOLOMONT, ALAN 12
SOLOW, ALAN 4
STERN, ANDREW 1
STRICKLAND, THOMAS L. 1
SULLIVAN, JOHN 2
SULLIVAN, JOHN J. 4
SWEENEY, ROSEMARIE 2
TALBOTT, SCOTT E. 3
TANDEN, NEERA 4
TAYLOR, NANCY E. 1
TRUMKA, RICHARD 1
TUCKER, DAVID M. 1
VERMA, RICHARD 3
VICK, PAUL 1
WEICH, RONALD 3
WHITE, WILLIAM 2
WHITE, WILLIAM R. 2
WOOSTER, LAURA 1
Yingling, Edward 1
YINGLING, EDWARD L. 5
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stroszek
November 26, 2009 10:44 AM in reply to spiteface
Oh no, Richard Trumka! Heaven forbid we have labor representatives in the White House!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LordSam
November 26, 2009 12:31 PM in reply to spiteface
FWIW, the WH blog post says that the "real" famous Michael Moore never visited the White House, just someone with the same name.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
William Holt
November 26, 2009 8:31 PM in reply to spiteface
Nice work - thanks!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
November 27, 2009 11:31 AM in reply to spiteface
Good effort, but in a cautionary note, recall that simple name matching is how Ted Kennedy barred from boarding a flight because he was deemed a potential terrorist.
And just to keep some perspective on level of influence of lobbyists in this administration in perspective, there's this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/26/AR2009112602362.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Riesz Fischer
November 27, 2009 12:57 PM
Is Jeff Gannon on the list?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?