
A new coalition led by more than 100 anti-war activists has announced an "Emergency Anti-Escalation Rally" to protest President Obama's new strategy for Afghanistan. The rally, scheduled for Dec. 12 in front of the White House, will include speeches by former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel and 2008 Green Party presidential nominee Cynthia McKinney.
The new coalition, called EndUSWars.org, has posted an "open letter" to Obama on its website, where it calls for an end to all U.S. military action in the Afghanistan region, including Predator drone airstrikes and covert intelligence operations.
Though the coalition's demands are to the extreme left-wing side of the progressive furor over Obama's plan add troops to the Afghanistan conflict, the organizer of the Dec. 12 rally says the coalition's anger at Obama is becoming more mainstream among the left.
"This is a movement, and it's growing," Laurie Dobson told TPMDC. "A lot of people said any change was better [than President Bush], but it's not better if we're still peddling perpetual war across the planet."
Dobson founded the coalition of anti-war progressives earlier this month, when she said it became clear to her that Obama was not going to cease military operations in Afghanistan. Dobson said the Dec. 12 rally is the first step in a series of protests moves she said might end with anti-war progressives running their own candidate for the 2012 Democratic presidential nomination.
Though Dobson said the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan began as "neo-con wars" under Bush, she claimed Obama's speech last night put made the wars his refocused the full force of the anti-war protests Bush faced onto the Obama administration.
"It's about Obama," she said of the Dec. 12 rally. "And refusing to support his presidency any longer."
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
December 2, 2009 11:46 AM
Because nothing screams "Credibility!" like Cynthia McKinney and Mike Gravel.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
December 2, 2009 12:58 PM in reply to The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
My thoughts exactly! With these Truthers who are paragons of sanity and respect at the helm, this demonstration is bound to be a roaring success!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed
December 2, 2009 1:34 PM
Why couldn't they pick the same day as the Tea/Scum Baggers' rally? I've always wanted to see what happens when matter and anti-matter meet....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Indie Pro
December 2, 2009 2:34 PM
apt
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_sketch.html
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kgosztola
December 11, 2009 9:07 PM
I guess it's better to support a Democratic "antiwar candidate" who escalates a war. That's better than supporting a man who diligently fought to end the draft during the Vietnam War and it's better than supporting a woman who, upon re-election to Congress, fought for a withdrawal from Iraq.
Anyways, this shouldn't be about personalities. Say we got rid of the Green Party people and so-called left wing extermists and filled the roster of speakers with progressive personalities that news media will allow on television, it would still be a rally against the Afghanistan War escalation.
Either you are for or against this expansion. So, create a sideshow by dissecting the list of speakers or decide which side of the fence you are on and engage in meaningful dialogue, engage in meaningful action.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
scottistoxic
December 11, 2009 11:02 PM in reply to kgosztola
I agree with kgosztola. How about we engage the actual issues instead of trying to prove how aloof we are by talking smack about people on the speakers' list? I heard the same nonsense from people who kept their distance from the anti-war movement when Bush was president, while they waited for a "respectable" candidate to come along. I saw it in 2004, 2006, and 2008, and every time those respectable democrats got elected they proved themselves indistinguishable from the neo-cons, voting for every war spending bill that passed in front of them.
Obama has committed THREE TIMES the number of troops to Afghanistan as there were under Bush. If you're going to sit on the sidelines of that catastrophe, thinking that your petty criticisms of a few individuals lets you off the hook, then it's your morality that is really questionable.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
resistuscrimes
December 11, 2009 10:01 PM
I find these initial comments shocking and unthinking. Because people are rightly calling out Obama on the continuation of war crimes initiated by Bush, you want to dismiss them as cooks and whack jobs. The preemptive war of aggression on Afghanistan was a war crime when it started under Bush and it's still a war crime no matter who the President happens to be. Where are your principles? Locked away in the safe of the Democratic Campaign head quarters? And what about the people of Afghanistan? Here is what they think of Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBHrnQTinGY
American Lives Are Not More Important Than Others!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?