TPMDC

Brown: No Negotiations On The Public Option, As Far As I'm Concerned

Spread the word and support this article on Reddit!


Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

One of the most dogged public option advocates in the Senate--and a key liaison between progressives and leadership--says no way, no how to yet another compromise.

"There's no negotiations as far as I'm concerned," insisted Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH). "We've compromised the public option three times, maybe four, depending on how you define it. This bill is not going to continue to become more pro-insurance company."

So the opt out is where you draw the line?

"Yeah, the opt out was not our first choice. Delinking from Medicare was not our first choice," Brown said.

Several conservative Democrats have entrenched their positions against the public option, and have threatened to filibuster the health care bill if it's not further compromised

"I think in the end that none of my colleagues want to be on the wrong side of history," Brown said. "I think that no Democrat wants to kill the most important bill in their political lives--in their careers--on a procedural vote."

That creates some complicated math. With Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) insisting that he'll filibuster any bill that includes public option of any kind--even a trigger--Reid has a maximum of 59 votes in his caucus for a health care bill. That means to retain a public option at all Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) must be brought aboard, and she's said the measure must be changed to a trigger of some sort.

Brown says he won't be helping in that effort: "I'm not drawing a line in the sand. I am not part of any effort to give the insurance companies more."


So what if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tries to amend the bill to include triggers to win over the centrist hold outs.

"The leader's not going to do that," Brown said. "The leader knows where the party is, knows where the Senate is, knows where the country is."

The difficulty, of course, is that Snowe isn't in the Democratic party. And she is has once again become a major focus.

"For me, I want to make sure at the end of the day that Senator Snowe will feel comfortable in joining us," Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) told reporters today. Carper has been attempting to broker a compromise on the public option modeled on Snowe's trigger.

"What I'm beginning to conclude is that the concerns that have been expressed by centrists...and the concerns that are being expressed by our liberal colleagues--and that's the need for more competition in states where affordability is a problem--I think those concerns can be met," Carper said.

The goal in the coming days, then, will be to bridge the gap between Brown and Snowe.

"Harry Reid had a tough decision because overwhelmingly his caucus supported the public option, and he gave an opt out to satisfy those who were opposed to it," Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) told reporters. "I think it was a reasonable position, Senator Snowe saw it differently.

Comments (16) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

December 3, 2009 4:45 PM   

This is kind of representation we need in the senate. It is important to fight the good fight whether you win or not! Thanks alot Senator Brown!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 5:22 PM    in reply to Progressive Party

Fighting the good fight and losing is the same as losing. We lost in 1992. It looks like we're going to lose again and there will be no serious attempt at health care reform for another decade.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 6:26 PM    in reply to richard f

The Dem leadership still has the reconciliation option for the public option. Democratic leadership is going to have to roll. They just have to made to roll the right way.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 5:10 PM   

I really don't know what to write. As a business owner my family of four (2 adults/2children) pay $22,000/yr for gold plated coverage. See any Doctor any time we want. I know it's way overboard because myself and my children go to Doctors that would probably be considered public option candidates. But then my wife sees doctors and uses the covergae more effectively. From what I'm reading and seeing I'll probably end up paying a little more.

But you know what? I'm OK with that. The reason is two-fold: my kids go to public school and I prefer knowing that their classmates can go to the doctor when there sick so my kids don't get sick. And second, when my kids sneeze too hard we're going to the doctor (a D.O. so I usually walk away empty handed with a note to come back if the symptoms persist) if for no other reason than peace of mind. I can only imagine the angst for a parent who has to choose otherwise.

Being that I'm going long a bit of advice. PETS, PETS, PETS! There is reaon why Europeans conqured the known world, and it was in large part due to their proximity to domesticated animals. My son had bad real bad juvenille asthma and I credit our dogs for getting him out of the woods. Sounds crazy but I even got guniea pigs and tell the wife it's my swine flu cure. Best regards and really enjoy the company.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 4:36 PM    in reply to Got Kids

Are we related? I'd gladly double my income tax to make sure everyone had health insurance, and I promise you, and everyone else, I am going to do everything in my electioneering power to see that Joe is not elected next time it comes around.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 5:17 PM   

Is this the guy?

Is the one good senator willing to take a stand for the people over corporate influence and greed?

I hope so.

But then, he needs to work to make the PO better, as well. A PO that'll keep the insurance companies honest, by making it one we can all get to, etc

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 5:45 PM   

Here's the problem. Brown wants healthcare reform. Nelson, Landrieu, Lieberman, Lincoln do not. It's hard to negotiate with nothing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 6:44 PM   

Read between the lines. The problem is Lieberman. They have to get Snowe on board, because Lieberman will not accept any kind of PO. Again, get it done. Future years offer opportunities to improve the bill. It's the only way. Failing to get a bill at all this year is the GOP's nuclear option. Don't let the cynical, soulless bastards win. Get a bill passed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 4:34 AM    in reply to sunnysteve

Exactly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 8:57 PM   

Call for cloture, if Lieberbunz filibusters, strip him from his committees. Offer it to Snowe. If she rejects, then call for cloture again. If they filibuster, throw a tantrum about obstruction and do reconciliation, citing undemocratic opposition. It's better than failing!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 3, 2009 9:20 PM   

Brown has no cards to play. It's all bluff. These people know they have to have a bill. And the infamous four just don't care if there's a bill nor not.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 5, 2009 12:42 PM   

The list of congressmen who voted against the health care reform bill includes Dennis Kucinich. Please click on the link below to read his reasons for voting against the bill and then reassess what true progressivism means.

http://kucinich.house.gov/NEWS/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=153995

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 12:37 AM    in reply to james bosley

Denny Koochsandwich is an ideologue who would much rather fall valiantly and have nothing than pragmatically fight for something. That he is a weirdo is an understatement.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 4:36 AM    in reply to james bosley

Progressives are classified with the moderates. But they are not a majority of the moderates. That's why true progressives know that compromise is necessary if THEY are going to get SOME of what they want instead of NOTHING.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 12:36 AM   

Brown is becoming a fine liberal (he always has been one, but now he's speaking up).

Dennis Kuchsandwich is a weirdo. Always reminded me of a deranged elf.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 6, 2009 12:40 AM   

Lieberbum can't drive on the Jewish Sabbath and cannot work on Friday evenings. He often misses votes because he has to walk 1.5 hours to get to the Senate building. Tell him that if he votes to filibuster, ALL votes will take place at sundown on Fridays and on the Jewish Sabbath.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on