
Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) refused to disclose any details of his abortion compromise plans to reporters a few minutes ago. The anti-abortion Democrat said that he was worried that anything more than cryptic answers to questions about how he plans to bridge the abortion divide in the Senate health care reform debate could derail the process by stirring up controversy.
"I'm not going into the nitty gritty," Casey said. He added that some of the current reporting on his plans has been "off," and that he feared that if he gave any insights into his thinking, groups on both sides of the abortion issue could begin attacking his plans before they're finalized.
As for Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE), the man whose pro-reform bill vote may hinge on the abortion amendment Casey offers, Casey said the pair are in continued direct talks about making a compromise amenable to Nelson and the pro-choice Democratic majority.
Casey wouldn't divulge any details of the conversations with Nelson and said "you'll have to ask him" when asked if Nelson was warming to Casey's compromise attempts.
Casey did mention some of his goals for a health care compromise, including adding funds to support young pregnant women who decide to give birth and offering tax credits for adoption. Nelson addressed those plans in a statement earlier this afternoon, and said they weren't enough to satisfy him.
"The compromise adds important new initiatives addressing teen pregnancy and tax credits to help with adoptions," Nelson said in the statement. "These are valuable improvements that will make a positive difference and promote life. But as it is, without modifications, the language concerning abortion is not sufficient."
The timing of the process could be key to getting a bill passed before Christmas, a timeline that Casey called "very imperative." He said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid hasn't given him a "deadline" on when an abortion deal needs to be done, it was clear that Casey is feeling the pressure of timing.
"We're down to 48-72 hours maybe -- something like that," he said.
Progressive Party
December 17, 2009 3:09 PM
Yes..this is change we can believe in! let's see how for fucking health care reform, if I can eliminate pro-choice, make abortions illegal and secure Nelson's vote...hmmnnn...
This is why I'm a Democratic Senator of the United States of America! We are sliding back 40 years into a dark time of culture wars and repressive government.
I still remember getting my head bashed in while in DC trying stop an illegal war!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
December 17, 2009 3:15 PM in reply to Progressive Party
Casey said he's looking for a way to make it amenable to Nelson AND pro-choice Democrats.
Casey is anti-abortion but I do believe he is negotiating in good faith and wants to preserve the Hyde amendment without expanding on anti-choice measures.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
holyhandgrenaid
December 17, 2009 4:04 PM in reply to FreeRider
I trust Casey to do this right, and split the difference in the fairest way possible. I just don't trust Nelson to settle for anything less than the moon.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ally
December 17, 2009 4:48 PM in reply to holyhandgrenaid
No. Casey cannot be trusted to do the fair thing on this issue - he is totally santorum when it comes to reproductive rights. His staffer said that he was elected to represent the pro-lifers who voted him into office - he doesn't care about women and what is right for them.
Hypocrite - if Casey were fair-minded - he would remove Fed dollars that pay for Viagra and health coverage for Prostate procedures, etc. Seems like many of those Male senators have had My Fed Tax Dollars pay for their prostate cancer treatments - why?
It is ridiculous that the Fed employee who had to have an emergency pregnancy termination to save her life - has to pay the $8000 out of her own pocket.
I really really hate the religious politicians who use their personal religious beliefs to screw everyone else over.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
FreeRider
December 17, 2009 6:04 PM in reply to ally
Casey can't remove those provisions you've mentioned. He's a senator not a king. Casey is like Tim Kaine--personally anti-abortion but not working to strip a woman of her right to choose.
Your comparing him to Santorum shows you're a liar.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ethan
December 17, 2009 6:17 PM in reply to ally
Are you kidding me? Santorum was a nut!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
masanf
December 17, 2009 4:05 PM
How many times does Nelson have to state that the Stupak language has to be in this piece of shit bill before the Democrats wise up to that? Are their heads made out of concrete, or do they just like appearing as idiots every time one of their "compromises" is shot down?
And it is very revealing that the Democrats are willing to admit they only have 48 hours left because they know the bill is getting more unpopular by the day. And this is what they want to ram down our throats? Absolutely pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?