
The news: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said "tit" on national television earlier today.
(Also, he admitted to enjoying government subsidies as a farmer for decades while calling government subsidies for health care "socialism." But, c'mon: "tit"!!)
The transcript of Grassley talking farm subsidies with a caller on C-SPAN's Washington Journal today (h/t ThinkProgress):
GRASSLEY: For the first 16 years I made $3,000 every other year as a state legislator. Now do you expect me to live on $3,000 every other year? No I was a factory worker for 10 years and I was a farmer for that period of time and I farm with my son now. So if you're trying to make a case that I've lived off the public tit all these years, I think you're saying correctly in the years I've been in the Congress but not the years before I came to Congress.
The video:
ohyeathatsright
December 1, 2009 5:48 PM
$3,000.00 in 1956 had about the same buying power as $23,533.21 in 2009.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hobartcat
December 1, 2009 9:28 PM in reply to ohyeathatsright
I wonder how much a house would have cost Senator Mammary.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
December 1, 2009 5:52 PM
Translation: Yes, I once worked at a real job, but I've had this sweet gig for nearly 20 years and I'm working it every way I can. When I retire I'll have a huge pension, life-long insurance and make a boatload of money giving speeches to the sucker
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eric the red
December 1, 2009 5:53 PM
It is sort of odd - rural folks and farmers in the midwest do from time to time say "teet", which is really perfectly expected. Tit, not so much.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jonathan Evans
December 1, 2009 5:57 PM
"Tit" is one of the seven indecent words enumerated in the FCC vs. Pacifica decision. I thought it wasn't supposed to be uttered on television.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
December 1, 2009 6:37 PM in reply to Jonathan Evans
goes to show... they are virtually the same word, but (butt) only one of them is verboten...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
realist
December 1, 2009 5:59 PM
And, as we said growing up on in Sodak, he's as worthless as tits on a boar.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
December 1, 2009 10:14 PM in reply to realist
Even worse than that: tits on a boor.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Hermagoras
December 1, 2009 6:03 PM
Uncle Sam wears tassels.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CityGuy
December 1, 2009 9:20 PM in reply to Hermagoras
But hopefully not Grassley.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lousgirl84
December 1, 2009 6:11 PM
I just want to know why so many republicans are so ugly. They all have red/white skin and blue eyes.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
December 1, 2009 6:30 PM in reply to lousgirl84
And their mothers wear combat boots.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
December 1, 2009 10:16 PM in reply to Dorn76
So their sons don't have to.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Quintin Jordon
December 1, 2009 6:14 PM
The use of the word "tit" does not bother me one bit, but what this man represents now does. As a Republican, he cries and whines about entitlements; however, when he was a private citizen he suckled from the same programs he now derides.
Sen. Grassley is not the only Republican that has suckled from the government teet for most of their lives. As we look down the list, we have Sen. McCain, Dick Armey, and Sen. Phil Gramm, just to name a few.
The hypocrisy in the Republican party is what should be questioned here, and not the word one uses to describe their dependency on the government.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Dorn76
December 1, 2009 6:31 PM in reply to Quintin Jordon
I would have preferred if he had referred to the public "ta-ta's" but that's just me.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
December 1, 2009 6:17 PM
Standard Republican values - subsidies that go to the rich or white rural voters are good, subsidies that have any possibility of going to "those people" are bad.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JEP07
December 1, 2009 6:36 PM
at least it weren't a boar hog...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Michael A
December 1, 2009 6:42 PM
The funny thing is that most die hard repukes live off the public teet, but then at the same time they bag on government spending. It is really bizarre. No bid contracts, gov't teet. Military contracts, gov't teet. Police and fire men, die hard repukes, suck off the public teet big time. Handouts to religious organizations, gov't teet.
The primary criteria for being a repuke is blatant hypocracy. Typical repuke, "Give me gov't handouts, but not the poor and needy. That's a real handout, I "work" for my handouts." Pathetic.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mycomment
December 1, 2009 7:54 PM in reply to Michael A
that's what kills me ... and iowa farmers/corp farms suck up plenty in federal subsidies.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
face
December 1, 2009 6:43 PM
As the audience was made up of high school students, Grassley picks up where Mark Foley left off.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bobbybob
December 1, 2009 7:28 PM
I grew up with the "Grassleys" of the country. My father was a barber in a farm town in IL famous for the famous "Parity Question" that Reagan didn't understand during his '80 campaign. Grassley danced the question and finessed with the part-time legistators' salary answer. Truth is he was a farmer before becoming a public servant and continues now with his son. Farm subsidies are the public dole as much as ADC and welfare are for urban families. And when you are talking about family farms they are as necessary. A lot of my dad's customers were farmers and I would listen to them discuss how much federal funding they were getting per acre for letting it go fallow that year or dairymen complain how low milk supports were and then go on to complain about so called welfare queens and 99% of the whiners were Republicans.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
December 1, 2009 7:28 PM
Actually, if you're talking about a cow, I think the proper word is "teat," which is, in fact, pronounced "tit."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tiowally
December 1, 2009 7:31 PM
I'll wager GrASSley still has an economic interest in a farm (or two) and that he proudly touts his legislative support for them, which benefits him, at every turn.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Solomon Drek
December 1, 2009 7:49 PM
"So if you're trying to make a case that I've lived off the public tit all these years, I think you're saying correctly in the years I've been in the Congress"
Put this together with Michele Bachmann's comment that the "private economy" was 100% private. Are "public tits" 100% public?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mycomment
December 1, 2009 7:50 PM
good grief, he's a friggin farmer.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ottis
December 1, 2009 8:01 PM
I remember watching Grassley several years back when his hero, prez Bush was giving a state of the union speech and said that the Gov. was going to support corn growers for producing gasohol. Sen. Grassley jumped around so I thought he must have peed his pants.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Kevin Cassidy
December 1, 2009 8:11 PM
Its an acceptable term in the context that he used it. It is offensive when referring to a woman's breast.
He's an asshole by the way
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chigger
December 1, 2009 8:38 PM
I'm not sure which son Grassley's talking about, but here's a subsidy report for Robin Grassley, from EWG, a very useful site:
http://farm.ewg.org/farm/persondetail.php?custnumber=007143444
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
chigger
December 1, 2009 8:50 PM
http://farm.ewg.org/farm/summary.php:
".....Direct Payment Subsidies, 2006
Over a million recipients collected direct payment subsidies for crops in 2006. Direct payment subsidies are provided to farmers regardless of commodity prices or farm income levels. Despite record prices for some crops and for net income for subsidized crops, and projections of similar market and income conditions over the next five years, Congress is poised spend another $26 billion on direct payment subsidies under the 2008 farm subsidy bill.
Like other crop subsidies, direct payments are heavily concentrated in the hands of the very largest farm operations. A total of 151 recipients collect at least $250,000 in direct payments in 2006.
Top States: Half of All Subsidies to Just Nine States
Texas emerges as the top beneficiary of farm subsidies over the last 12 years, collecting over $16.2 billion. It is followed by Iowa ($15.9 billion), Illinois ($13.2 billion), Nebaraska ($10.4 billion) and Minnesota ($10.2 billion). Five states accounted for over one-third of all subsidy payments, and half of the subsidies were absorbed by 9 states, all in the Midwest, South or Great Plains regions.
Top Congressional Districts: 22 Districts Collect Half the Subsidy
Of the nation's 435 congressional districts, just 22 account for over half of all farm bill subsidies.
Top Programs For Subsidies: Corn is King
Over the past twelve years, taxpayers have spent $56 billion on corn subsidies paid to over 1.5 million recipients, making it the top crop for federal assistance. Wheat subsidies ranked second, which paid $22 billion to more than 1.3 million recipients, followed closely by cotton subsidies, which provided $21 billion to over 247,00 recipients over the period....."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ottis
December 1, 2009 9:03 PM
Look's like Grassley has lived off the public tit much longer than he stated. Oh well he is a Republican therefore a liar.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
iamwil
December 1, 2009 9:05 PM
'Grassley' on the Iowa farm subsidy database
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pv2k
December 1, 2009 10:40 PM in reply to iamwil
Robin Grassley is Chuck's kid.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ilovebacon
December 1, 2009 9:32 PM
That's the ONLY tit he's lived off of. Perhaps if his mother had breast fed him he wouldn't be the Neanderthal he now is...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joe
December 1, 2009 9:46 PM
What Chucky is saying to us is..."I GOT MINE"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?