TPMDC

Clyburn Compares Health Care Battle To Struggle For Civil Rights Act

Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!


Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO).

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn compared health care reform to the struggle to pass the Civil Rights Act, telling a Democratic colleague that people forget the compromises needed decades ago for the legislation to break a filibuster.

In comments at the start of a conference call, Sen. Claire McCaskill made a crack that the political climate has gotten tougher since Fox News became more powerful and said that's one reason why there is opposition to the health care plan.

"The 30-second soundbyte is what's got all this up in the air," agreed Clyburn (D-SC). "Every big social change you go through this. It will take six to eight years before this all settles down."

Their remarks were captured as a Wednesday afternoon conference call about the Democratic National Committee's proposed changes to the presidential 2012 nominating calendar began. The call was open to the press and the public.

Clyburn, a veteran of the civil rights fight and longtime participant in state and federal politics, said people forget the difficulties of passing health care.

"The first civil rights bill was very comprehensive," Clyburn said. "In order for the filibuster to be broken we had to drop off the Voting Rights [Act]."

He said there was big disagreement between Congressional leadership and Martin Luther King Jr.

"[President Lyndon] Johnson was very clear, it was not going to get done if they kept voting rights in," he said.

Clyburn did not explicitly draw the link between health care and civil rights, but he's been saying lately he was not confident the public option would survive a final health care bill.

McCaskill (D-MO) also said of health care politics, "Time's on our side," noting her seat isn't up for reelection until 2012.

The call topic itself was fascinating, as Democrats want to take power away from the superdelegates who helped decide the 2008 primary fight between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. More on that here.

Comments (4) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

December 31, 2009 9:41 AM   

Interesting comparison for Clyburn to make. And keep hammering on the "Republicans want to repeal all of it" theme!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 31, 2009 10:29 AM    in reply to CityGuy

Yeah, he's right. This is more of a struggle that we need to carry on, rather than a quickie.

The bottomline on HCR: It's all about regulation. More of it is better. A country like Germany doesn't even have single payer, yet they have tons of regulation. We'll need more of that as we go forward. Obama's bill is the foundation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 31, 2009 2:48 PM   

In this argument within the left over rejecting the health care or accepting incremental improvement, why has this history of the civil rights bill been brought up early and often? For those of us too young to remember details of that debate, we probably know the Civil Rights Act was in 1964 and the Voting Rights Act in 1965 but why they were in different years has gone unexplained. Why hasn't Clyburn been all over the airwaves explaining this?!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 31, 2009 8:38 PM   

The racists who were against all the Civil Rights legislation back then often fell back on the argument that it was un-American to have such equality---that it was unconstitutional. Many on the right are using much the same argument against HCR. Am I the only one to notice this bad habit of the right?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on