
Democrats are pointing fingers at Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) for blocking the confirmation of Erroll Southers as the administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, and the conservative senator is pointing right back.
DeMint's office said it's not an issue of blocking Southers but instead that the senator is seeking debate on the nomination.
DeMint isn't planning on revoking the hold.
A Senate aide told TPMDC that DeMint's objection was to the procedure Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid attempted to use to approve the nomination - unanimous consent.
DeMint thought there should be a debate and a roll call vote, the aide said.
"Leader Reid can schedule consideration of this nomination any time he wants," the aide said. "But he felt health care was more important. Our view is if the Democrats are upset they've only got themselves to blame because Obama took forever to nominate him."
Southers was nominated in early September and his confirmation hearings were wrapped up earlier this month.
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-MS) said in a statement TSA needs a permanent administrator.
"Erroll Southers, an experienced, highly-qualified nominee, continues to be held up in the Senate by someone who obviously puts process ahead of progress. If TSA is to become the kind of nimble, responsive organization the American people deserve in times like this, it will need a Senate-confirmed administrator. If nothing else, the events of last week highlighted this lack of leadership."
The sticking point for DeMint is that Southers would not answer a question about whether he would allow screeners to collectively bargain and unionize.
In a statement responding to the Christmas terror attempt, DeMint said the incident was more proof that TSA should not allow collective bargaining. DeMint believes that would weaken security.
Thompson also noted the "key role" Customs and Border Protection agents play in security, and said that agency also deserves to have its leader confirmed in a speedy manner.
In late September, President Obama nominated Alan Bersin to be commissioner of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency, which is part of Homeland Security. Before this nomination, Bersin served as the border "czar."
Rep. John Mica (R-FL) said in a statement Congress "must change the process by which TSA administrators serve," according to McClatchy.
"There has been no TSA administrator for nearly a year and the next one will be the fifth in eight years. Running a security agency with a revolving door is a recipe for failure," Mica said.
Reid spokesman Jim Manley told McClatchy Monday that Reid is trying to get Southers confirmed quickly.
"Republican obstructionism has prevented TSA from having the leadership in place that the organization deserves," Manley said.
Late Update: TPMDC has learned that Reid will hold a roll call vote when Congress returns in mid-January.
Walter Mitty
December 29, 2009 9:41 AM
Sen. Demented wants a debate because it could take 3-4 days - The GOP want to debate every damn little thing because 3-4 days for everything pushes back the major issues the Obama Administration wants to tackle ie jobs, financial reforms, immigration.
I wish somebody would make a big stink about the number of cloture votes and filibusters in Obama's first year vs those faces by all other Presidents. Maybe that's what the Dems secretly plan to run on in 2010 and is reason why they are keeping relatively quiet about all the blatant obstruction.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
December 29, 2009 1:50 PM in reply to Walter Mitty
If they want that to be an issue, though, they really need to start pounding on it now. Protest loudly every time the Republicans hold up the process, especially when it involves defense or security issues. Then when it's used in the campaign, it will have some resonance, and voters will remember all those things that Republicans were blocking over the course of the last year.
This is what Republicans did going into the 2004 election. Every time you turned around, Republicans were complaining about the obstructionist Democrats in the Senate, even though Democrats were doing better by Bush's nominees than Republicans did by Clinton's. And they continually pointed to Tom Daschle, of all people, as the "chief obstructionist." I have to believe that continual drumbeat, ridiculous as those charges often were, was an important factor in giving Thune his narrow margin of victory over Daschle that November.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joshua the Teacher
December 29, 2009 9:57 AM
Wow, it's a good thing that we don't put our lives in the hands of unionized people. You know, police, firefighters, nurses, pilots, and flight attendants. Those same flight attendants, btw who helped subdue the terrorist suspect during Christmas w/o asking for a raise or better health care first.
I hope the Dem's don't back down on stupid Demint.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
December 29, 2009 10:06 AM
DeMint, King, Rove, the Cheneys and the rest of the GOP insurgents want another terrorist attack. They think it will help them get back in power. Hoekstra seems to think that the Detroit incident happened because Obama stopped using the phrase "war on terror". So, Mr President, squint yer eyes and say "Bring it on" and the terrists will be shakin' in their boots. That's successful counterterrorism fer ya, you betcha.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
December 29, 2009 10:25 AM in reply to jeffgee
Tut tut. They don't "want" an attack. They merely consider one inevitable because of Obama's supine surrender of the Sudetenland to the t'rr'sts. Sad. Very sad. But obviously not their fault when the inevitable happens. Besides t'r attacks are always the fault of the guy whose watch it happens on, except when they're actually Clinton's fault.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
febreze
December 29, 2009 10:32 AM
This is one of the few times that I agree with Republicans. I don't want the TSA to be unionized. If an employee of the TSA makes a mistake, I want him or her to be fired. Too many politics involved with dealing with unions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joshua the Teacher
December 29, 2009 11:04 AM in reply to febreze
Yes! If only they were more like Blackwater and Halliburton, then they could be trusted to keep us safe...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
December 29, 2009 1:56 PM in reply to febreze
There is a flip side to that, though. I am convinced that one reason, possibly a primary one, that TSA employees don't use the discretion to bend rules when circumstances call for it that TSA administrators insist that they have is the fear of being fired. Nobody is going to fire you for sticking to the literal text of the rules, however much they don't make sense in any given case. If you bend the rules and something goes wrong, or even if it doesn't go wrong but someone complains, you might find yourself reprimanded or out of a job. Nobody is going to take that risk. There's no reward for being right, and certain punishment for being wrong.
Some union protection might make inspectors feel a little freer to use their judgement, and if the unions can secure better pay and benefits, you might be able to attract people who are better able to use good judgement.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
roxsteady
December 29, 2009 11:46 AM
The Republicans are a disgrace. Whether they formed a union or not, who feels safer with some screener who makes little more than the minimum wage and isn't really trained well in security procedures and other technics that should be left to better trained and better paid individuals? The Republicans still can't dispute the fact that once the nomination was made, it was they who held it up and they continue to do so. I hope they flogged this stupid saltine!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sully18
December 29, 2009 6:03 PM
Oh my God;the blame game,again.Isn`t that what Congress does,especially the Senate? The apathy in Congress to get
things done for the people comes from the R`s obstructionism and the D`s buckling to it by weakening bills.This is particularly disgusting.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?