Dem 2010 Campaign Line Emerges: GOP Will 'Repeal' Health Care

Well, the bill isn't signed yet- still major opportunities to get screwed by coathanger Ben or traitor Joe.

Unfortunately for the D's, as more details of this insurance industry give-away come out, repealing this reform might be a winning ticket.

We will see.

Uhhh some republicans will RUN ON reapealing this. Shitty strategy if you ask me.

Yeh, repeal taxation without benefits until 2014, repeal no regulation or oversight of monopolies. Repeal mandated, uncontrolled insurance cost and IRS policing. This bill stinks and the DINO's don't have the cajones to force a better bill through reconciliation and Rahmco and lose their income from Phama, Insurance and Hospital lobby's.

Uh oh, will this be Jane Hamsher's next move? Start pushing Republican candidates. Kill the Bill doesn't seen to be working so how about repeal the bill. Now that she has teamed up with Grover Norquist this seems like logical next step.

Well with the Senate Non-Profit Option is the biggest hoax of all times. In 2007, North Carolina Blue Cross had a profit of $190 mil. The pay increase for the CEO? 261% to of $3.1 mil. Find anything wrong in this picture? Hell yea. So lets bring Public Option back. Full article here:
http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2007/03/29/flux-up-yonder/

I doubt if they would repeal the mandates.

"Elect Us! We deliver for Industry and Corporations!"

Conservative democrats are unimpressive. The 3rd way sucks.

How dumb can these Democrats be?

Substance aside, this healthcare bill isn't very popular right now and leading a campaign charge with it will significantly discourage an already divided base. The base may come around as the plan is improved over the years and the rest of the public certainly will once it comes into force and they realize there aren't any death panels, but neither of those things are gonna happen before 2010.

So why run an entire campaign on protecting this unpopular and divisive bill from being repealed?

Here's an idea: why not set up the campaign, not as a battle between this bill or repeal, but as a battle betweem this bill and the Republican alternative--to completely deregulate the health insurance industry.

The Republicans like to call their plan "allowing insurance companies to sell across state lines", but of course Aetna, Cigna, BCBS and many others already do that. What the Republican plan would actually do is let insurance companies ignore the health insurance regulations of whatever state they're selling in and instead only have to obey the regulations whatever state or territory they choose as their "primary" market (yeah, they get to choose). Since the US Virgin Islands have virtually no insurance regulation, my guess is that they choose there.

Everyone agrees that something has to be done about rising health insurance premiums, and the Republican plan is to do to health insurance what they did for Walll Street?

Why aren't we hearing THAT from Dems?

better be a very progressive HCR bill.
Actually voting every incumbent out, save the true progressives, and getting new ones is the only way to clean up the senate even if they aren't dems. It will open up the seats for the next election at the very least.
We need to unite with the other side and vote as a block, and fight it out later. This group is not doing us any good. They have too many years of being bought off. Our country is becoming a hot bed of corruption. Goldman Sachs is looting us.

Might have worked if they had achieved meaningful reform.

Since they are giving so much more power to the already abusive and greedy monopolies in their bill, maybe it should be repealed.

If you think getting the reforms in this bill, that was written by the health insurance industry, was hard, just imagine how hard it will be to change things after we give the monopolies more money and power...

The DCCC conquered everything in America. The Obama engine made quick work out of the political landscape in America. Repunks are getting heads bashed in with hammers.

Reckless Retard having some grande of an old ball.

Even Teddy K. knew that reform had to be, at times incremental. Take as big a step as possible, then build on it. My bet is that he would not want it dead, realizing the real consequences. He would be back to work on more improvements. He wanted UHC a damned long time ago and worked hard to get us here. Those on the left who are willing to throw out the baby with the bathwater have to realize that a D majority is not an ideological majority. Get it through conference and to the Prez. Let's not rest on our achievements, as minimal as they seem.

i don't think anyone really cares what he says
http://www.m65jacket.com/