
Expect Congressional hearings exploring what happened in the weeks before the attempted terror attack on Flight 253 in the new year.
President Obama returns to Washington next week and plans a private huddle with intelligence officials and his national security team to evaluate the findings of a probe into the communication breakdown that allowed a Nigerian man to board a plane with explosives in his underwear.
Already the administration has put in place new measures and homeland security officials are coordinating with international airports.
Congress will be back mid-January and if the political chatter this week is any indication, Flight 253 will dominate their return.
In the week since the incident, there have been statements from Obama and other top White House officials, a preliminary review and a host of political fundraising attempts and accusations coming from GOP members of Congress and former President Dick Cheney.
Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kit Bond announced Jan. 21 hearings of their Senate Select Committee on Intelligence but will start the investigation sooner by collecting "all intelligence related to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab held by various intelligence agencies in order to determine who had what, and how the information was handled."
The panel also will review national security policies on sharing information and terrorist watchlisting, they said. The House intelligence panel also is looking into the incident.
"The Christmas Day incident revealed some serious failures in our nation's system of security," said Feinstein (D-CA).
She urged lawmakers to "put aside political differences" and remember how the nation worked together after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
"Christmas Day was a stark reminder, and we must heed it by working together with the President to take whatever steps are necessary to close the gaps in our system of defense," she said.
Bond (R-MO) said the probe will follow the intelligence "down the rabbit hole" to prevent further problems.
"Somebody screwed up big time, that plane would have gone down if the suicide bomber was more competent or the passengers and crew were less heroic," he said.
The Senate Commerce Committee, with jurisdiction over TSA, also will hold a hearing to look at the state of aviation security. It is scheduled for Jan. 20.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is collecting the data from the various agencies. Members of Congress were briefed as well.
Officials have said if information had been better shared between intelligence agencies, the suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would have been prevented from boarding the plane.
Dennis Blair wrote a letter to the intelligence community today saying the review is tough to hear but that the community must respond as a team.
diachronic
December 31, 2009 6:03 PM
While Bond follows US intelligence failures "down the rabbit hole" (he is not kidding), he also might want to take a look at today's intelligence catastrophe:
http://www.atlargely.com/atlargely/2009/12/seven-cia-officers-killed-in-afghanistan.html
Wishful thinking, of course. No one wants to take a close look at this.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dwikis
December 31, 2009 7:46 PM
Intelligence sometimes not accurate in predicting the situation. Not only in developing countries like us in Indonesia, but also developed countries in the usa.
Our greetings from Indonesia.
http://dwikisetiyawan.wordpress.com/2009/12/25/kerja-keras-adalah-energi-kita/
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 1, 2010 5:00 PM in reply to dwikis
Effective use of intelligence here was not attempted. It did not fail, the structure of it failed and apparently individual people failed. Failed to make the attempt.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sunnysteve
December 31, 2009 8:23 PM
Please correct 'former President Dick Cheney'...... to read 'former chickenhawk draft dodger, neo-con, shill for military-industrial complex and petroleum industry, betrayer of CIA undercover agent, torture cheerleader and surrogate President Dick Cheney....'
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
January 1, 2010 12:23 AM in reply to sunnysteve
"asshole traitor" is so much shorter, though.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RAM
January 1, 2010 8:40 AM
Just a thought, but maybe the NSA could do a better job catching and stopping actual terrorists overseas if their computers weren't clogged up with dreck from illegal wiretaps on U.S. citizens.
And I've yet to have anyone explain how humiliating people waiting in line at U.S. airports and on domestic flights will stop terrorist mopes from getting on planes in Nigeria or the Netherlands. About the only reason 9/11 happened in the first place was because Bush and Cheney couldn't be bothered to take even rudamentary anti-terror precautions.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
diachronic
January 1, 2010 9:31 AM in reply to RAM
The overreaction and mis-allocation of resources that this will produce will cripple our ability to fight several wars overseas.
That our intelligence services are already overtaxed is apparent from the disaster in Afghanistan.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
coonsey
January 1, 2010 1:29 PM
I'm sorry but isn't re-evaluating the security system IMPLYING that it was never checked out in the first place? Isn't Obama admitting failure by acting as tho something was done wrong?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Overreach THIS!
January 1, 2010 5:04 PM in reply to coonsey
This isn't Bush, where nothing was ever wrong. Obama stated quickly that *it was indeed grievously wrong,* which is why he wants to see it fixed, and fixed good and proper. Like a grown-up would do. Calling that "failure" is Bush mentality.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
bluebell
January 1, 2010 5:30 PM
About once a year David Brooks is right:
"In a mature nation, President Obama could go on TV and say, “Listen, we’re doing the best we can, but some terrorists are bound to get through.” But this is apparently a country that must be spoken to in childish ways. The original line out of the White House was that the system worked. Don’t worry, little Johnny.
When that didn’t work the official line went to the other extreme. “I consider that totally unacceptable,” Obama said. I’m really mad, Johnny. But don’t worry, I’ll make it all better. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/01/opinion/01brooks.html?hp
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
CVille Dem
January 1, 2010 9:13 PM in reply to bluebell
Bluebell, why don't you just go to another planet? There is nothing on this one that will ever suit you. Question: Do you chew on nails every single night?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
atlliberal
January 2, 2010 2:22 PM
"Already the administration has put in place new measures and homeland security officials are coordinating with international airports."
Why was this not done 8 years ago? How can the Bush administration say they "kept us safe" when they didn't even coordinate security for flights to the US from other countries? That's like saying you're safe from burglars because you're guarding the front door of the house while the burglars have complete access to the back door.
Did the Bush administration do anything right?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?