TPMDC

TPMDC Sunday Roundup

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Gibbs: Obama Ordering Security Reviews After Airline Attack
Appearing on Face The Nation, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that President Obama has ordered a thorough security review in the wake of the attack on a Northwest Airlines flight. "The president has asked for two reviews to take place as a result of this potential terrorist attack," Gibbs said. "The first is a watch listing review .. so we want to ensure that all of the information that needs to go to decision makers gets to where it needs to go. The president has asked for a review of the procedures that in some cases are several years old." The Second review will be of detection capabilities at airports, "to ensure that someone who that might be carrying explosives like this individual was can't get through a screening stage like they did in Amsterdam."

Napolitano: No Evidence That Airline Attack Was Part Of Larger International Effort
Appearing on State of the Union, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano said that there is so far no evidence that the Northwest Airlines attack was part of a broad international effort. "Right now we have no indication that it is part of anything larger," said Napolitano. She also sought to reassure the public that the flight and overall security apparatus functioned smoothly: "While we continue to investigate the source of this incident, the traveling public should be very confident of what we're doing now."

McConnell: Health Care Bill 'Will Be A Big, If Not Central Issue' In 2010 And 2012
Appearing on This Week, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell gave an ambiguous answer about whether Republicans will run in 2010 on a platform of repealing the health care bill. After McConnell said the bill was a political problem for the Democrats, host Jake Tapper told McConnell that he hadn't answered the question. "Well, I'm sorry, I thought I did answer your question," McConnell responded. "There's no question that this bill, if it were to become law, and frankly even if it doesn't become law, will be a big, if not central issue not only in the 2010 election, but in the 2012 election."

Gingrich: Every Republican Will Run On Repealing Health Care Bill
Appearing on Meet The Press, former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) predicted that Republicans will make repeal of the health care bill a top campaign issue: "I suspect every Republican running in '10 and again in '12 will run on an absolute pledge to repeal this bill. The bill--most of the bill does not go into effect until '13 or '14, except on the tax increase side; and therefore, I think there won't be any great constituency for it. And I think it'll be a major campaign theme."

Specter: GOP Refuses To Be Bipartisan -- And I Remember Discussions In the Caucus
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) blamed the Republican caucus for a refusal to achieve bipartisanship on health care -- and said that this problem goes back to discussions he witnessed when he was a Republican: "Senator DeMint is the author of the famous statement that this is going to be President Obama's Waterloo, that this ought to be used to break the president, so that before the ink was dry on the oath of office -- and I know this because I was in the caucus -- the Republicans were already plotting ways to beat President Obama in 2012. Now, effective government in a democracy relies upon some bipartisanship, but there simply isn't any. And the process which was used was not good. The lead story today in the Washington Post is that after you reform health care, you ought to reform the Senate. And I would start with the process."

Van Hollen On Parker Griffith: People Don't Like 'A Finger In The Wind'
Appearing on Fox News Sunday, DCCC chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) responded to the party switch of Democrat-turned-Republican Rep. Parker Griffith, predicting that the Alabama Congressman will face a backlash: "I know he dressed it up as a matter of principle. The fact is he did a poll that showed that he might be in trouble. My view is he miscalculated politically because the fact of the matter is people will respect a person who will have differences. What they don't like is people with a finger to the wind."

Peter King: Administration Should REmind The American People About The War On Terror
Appearing on Face The Nation, Rep. Peter King (R-NY) called on the Obama administration to remind the American people about the important of the fight against terrorism, in light of the Northwest Airlines attack: "You know, for the first three months of this administration, they refused to use the word terrorism. And even at a speech at West Point, the president did not use the word 'terrorism.' This is a teaching moment, to use the president's term. And I believe that he or the secretary or the vice president or the attorney general should be out there reminding the American people, saying this shows how deadly this enemy is. This shows how real this threat is and why we have to do whatever we possibly can to protect the American people."

Comments (14) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

mcc

user-pic

December 27, 2009 4:24 PM   

During the HCR debate, the Republicans overwhelmingly focused on campaigning directly to the public, whereas the Democrats overwhelmingly focused on working within Congress-- they seemed to treat any public-facing campaigning as a distraction and focused wholly on those internal machinations (working with Senators, working with industry groups and special interests) which would get a bill passed.

The Democratic approach turned out to be an effective way to pass a bill, but entirely useless in either getting the public on board with the bill or even explaining the bill's most basic elements to the public. The Republican approach turned out to be an effective way to sway public opinion on the bill, but ultimately useless or counterproductive in preventing the bill from passing.

In other words: It was not that the Democrats did a poor job of selling the bill to the public. It was that they did not even try.

I guess now we get to see what happens when the Democrats go into campaign mode and sell to the public the bill they just passed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 27, 2009 5:25 PM   

McConnell+Gingrich: Public accord for your point of view on health care isn't as strong as you think it is.

Campaigning on a platform of repealing health care reform is arguably the single most idiotic thing you could possibly do this year. Assuming Democrats make a reasonable effort to dispel the myths in the public mindset of what the final bill contains, such a strategy will only result in you losing even more seats.

You believe, almost with glazed eyes in the wishful thinking that there's this massive Republican wave that will come in and sweep out the Democrats, but that wave is not big enough anymore to do any damage to their control of either chamber. Further, it won't even break if the Dems can educate the public that your entire political position is based on lies.


Regarding Rep. Griffith, he made a huge error in assuming his chances of re-election will be helped by changing parties. He'll be lucky if he can even get on the ballot now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 10:33 AM    in reply to Icon

"McConnell+Gingrich: Public accord for your point of view on health care isn't as strong as you think it is."

How long do they think they can beat this thing into the dirt? Even teabaggers will wary of healthcare bashing. Getting as old as Britney Spears's haircuts.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 12:29 PM    in reply to ilovebacon

The GOP has no leadership right now. I think that's really the key problem.

If asked, I doubt many voters have any idea who Mitch McConnell is. People recognize Gingrich, but he's been out of governing or a decade so I doubt very many people really care what he says.

I'm not a partisan, but I feel really sorry for the GOP right now. There's no leadership, no vision. It's just a party whose position is to 'prevent the Democrats from doing anything'. It's an acceptable general goal, but it's not a vision.

Unless they can generate some unified vision, they can't win in 2010, they can't win in 2012, they really can't win any election ever.

The GOP did it in 1994 with the Contract with America. The Dems did it in 2006 with the 100-Hour Plan. Both were manifestos predicated on the party in question having a long list of legislation they wanted to see passed I see no such legislation from the so-called Party of No.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 2:25 PM    in reply to Icon

Newt has become the neo-Rove of the post-Rove GOP. But Newt is a thing of the past, just as the constantly-evoked Reagan. It's a dry spell for the GOP, and will likely be for at least 3 or 4 more years--since even "superstar" candidates need a couple years to germinate. And I highly doubt any stars will run as Republican, anyway.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 27, 2009 11:59 PM   

Newt Gingrish and Mitch McConnell should be humiliated. MM is called out on Barack Obama's website and NG is living in 1994 when he had any amount of credibility. He shouldn't be allowed to speak considering the amount of obstruction and misleading garbage he's speaking towards.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 9:22 AM   

The party of NO reaches it's ultimate conclusion - they've finally admitted that their only idea is "undo whatever the Democrats do".

And as to Peter "I piss my pants every time I see an Arab" King, he's right - the "attack" in Detroit shows how deadly this enemy [al Qaeda] is. Unfortunately, the lesson is that they're idiots who light their pants on fire and get the shit kicked out of them. Not exactly "axis of evil" material...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 10:01 AM    in reply to Matt Jones

That's so true about King...his picture is next to 'cowardly reactionary douchebag' in the dictionary.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 9:22 AM   

I hope they do run on repealing health care!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 9:34 AM   

Gingrich hasn't made a right call on anything since the hogs ate my kid brother. His so called and exagerrated 'astute political mind' is in feverish overdrive since he has been eclipsed by Palin and her ilk. He can barely tread water around her and the ma-roons that orbit her cast jaundiced eyes to him as he is an intellectual...and therefore suspicious. He blundered in the New York-23 fiasco and looked weak alongside Palin, and Armey, and that nut Hoffman. Not one of his predictions has reached fruition and his demand on the Sunday Morning talk shows is baffling. He is just a little too Mr Magoo with the likes of such heavyweight assholes like DeMint, Sessions, McConnell, McCain, Inhofe, et al. Newt's just yesterday's papers; too much baggage and hypocrisy for any credible run for any office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 10:35 AM    in reply to Marinus van der Lubbe

Hahaha. Roly-poly Newt STILL lives off his pudge-ball Murphy Brown-era Speaker of the House BS.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 10:12 AM   

What does Napolitano think the kid was doing in Yemen? And does she think he bought the highly sophisticated explosive over the counter?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 10:13 AM    in reply to Dorn76

I guess I think Napolitano should just can it for a while. She's not helping here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 28, 2009 10:34 AM   

They cannot run against something that a vast majority of Americans support. Therefore they must work to de-bug this thing and implement as much as possible that effect the average voter.
Repub's think this is a way to get back to majority, but if Dem's are smart enough. (?) They can actually gain more seats instead of trying to guard the ones they have. Emphasize the positive.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on