TPMDC

GOP Delays Aimed At Political - Not Legislative - Victory

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

Read More

Health Care

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Republicans acknowledge that it's not going to be possible to block the health care bill from clearing the Senate chamber.

So why the delay?

One reason the votes have been held at wacky hours is that GOP leaders have forced the full 30 hours required between cloture votes and objecting if Democrats try to shorten that time window. They also are taking advantage of Senate rules that are often waived to make sure that leadership has to file three cloture votes.

There's no going back since the trio of votes were set in motion, so it's highly unlikely the health care bill would be able to clear final passage before the scheduled 7 p.m. Christmas Eve vote, even though the total is a foregone conclusion.

Still, Republicans are complaining about "dead of night" votes.

Over the last week, Republicans pushed a sort of lazy man's filibuster, forcing Senate clerks to read long amendments aloud rather than holding the floor for their own debate.

But, as Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) pointed out last night, they didn't stay to listen to the bill being read aloud.

Democrats complained about the extra hours and painted the GOP as obstructing.

On the other hand, the delay couldn't have been too tough since the chamber actually adjourned early after the amendment reading burned up several hours.

Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) told the New York Times the Senate's designation of the "world's greatest deliberative body ... has been destroyed" thanks to the partisan delay tactics.

Republicans only have 40 members, so there aren't many maneuvers in their political toolbox.

The trio of cloture votes is not a new tactic, though the recent examples of amendments being read aloud have been the most extreme the chamber has seen this year.

The Republicans also forced three cloture votes on an unemployment extension - even though it ultimately passed with a unanimous vote.

The defense spending bill passed 88-10 but took days to get through because of parliamentary delay tactics designed to mess with the health care bill.

The Hill reported that Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) said on CNBC the Republican caucus is deciding today whether they will slow down an expected upcoming vote on increasing the nation's debt limit.

They may not be gaining anything legislatively, but view it as a political victory, especially pointing to poll numbers that sink as the days wane.

Republicans don't want to look like grinches by keeping the chamber in for the holiday, but felt delay could help their cause. It also portrays the Democrats as ineffectual and prolonged the party infighting they are exploiting as often as possible in the lead up to the 2010 midterm Congressional elections.

The GOP also considers it a big win that they forced Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to cancel a planned fundraiser a few weeks ago.

Comments (16) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (1)

December 21, 2009 11:32 AM   

I heard Mitch McConnell on NPR this morning, with his characteristic blend of sneering and huffing, that if the Democrats were proud of the bill, they wouldn't be holding votes in the dead of night. NPR, of course, being fair and balanced, didn't feel the need to tell the listeners that the the votes were being held at night because McConnell and the Republicans were forcing these marathon sessions. Would have messed up the narrative, don't you see.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:33 AM   

Yeah, forcing a frail and ailing 92 year old to vote in the dead of night is a whopping political victory. Showing their true colors once again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:40 AM   

Hilarious. Like the self-imposed deadlines aren't political.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 12:41 PM    in reply to Indie Pro

Madam: This is more like being down 60 to 40 in a football game, with the opposing team having the ball second and ten on the 50 yard line, with 55 seconds left in the game, it's 10 pm in Green Bay, 33 degrees and raining, with 30 mile an hour winds, they took a knee on the last play, and you intend to take all three of your time outs. Poor losers? Throwing a snot tantrum? Why not phone in bomb threats? Please, elect a few adults.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:09 PM    in reply to sunnysteve

politics isn't football at all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:55 AM   

Do they realize that the newly-negative polls they are waving around with such glee represent dissatisfaction with the bill from **progressives** who don't think it goes far enough? Nah, I guess they neither know nor care. I'm almost beginning to feel embarrassed for the Republican party. At least when I think about Republicans of the past who actually did care about the country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 12:38 PM    in reply to Elizabeth2

Sure they realize it. They are just happy with anything negative. In fact, their reaction to this is getting me all excited about the bill. I'm only surprised they haven't sent any Dem Senators to "swim with the fishies" in order to get their way, since 'praying' for one to die naturally didn't work!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:09 PM    in reply to Elizabeth2

That's a point I wish the Dems would counter with. It would really hammer home the point that this isn't some progressive take-over like the GOP is trying to frame it as.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:16 PM    in reply to Walter Mitty

Bashing progressives to enlist popular support? So you will actually move the national dialogue backwards and further inflame and insult the liberal wing of the Dem party in order to . . . do what, exactly? The Dems have the votes and I've been told for months that's all that matters. Yet now distancing the Dems from progressives to attack Repubs is a smart tactical move? You may want to reconsider that one, Walter.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:57 AM   

Shorter McConnell: We're going to obstruct and delay to the hilt, and if that results in late night voting, shame on THEM!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 11:58 AM   

We could just put a permanent headline at the top of TPMDC reading "GOP Actions Aimed At Political - Not Legislative - Victory" and be done with it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 12:40 PM   

I wonder how many republicans were sitting and listening as the amendments were being read? After all, it was they who complained about how loooooong they were and took so much time to read! Oh, I'll take a guess:: None of them were listening.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 12:58 PM   

And again, the news media from NPR on down all fail wildly.

Would the world really implode if news media fact-checked people on the spot?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:13 PM   

Who cares what time the votes are held? Do they think C-SPAN turns off the cameras?

Sure, block everything. They did that in the lead up to the 1996 election, and lost both the presidency and seats in Congress. Keep going over the cliffs kids.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 1:35 PM   

abolish the senate. just let the lobbyists write the laws.
that would just be eliminating the middleman!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

December 21, 2009 2:43 PM   

Republicans would complain about their own actions being inconvenient. They don't have the IQ required to realize it's their own fault.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on